search for: ocfs2_unlink

Hi, I have just moved(about 2 weeks ago) an OCFS2 cluster into production(latest ocfs2, kernel 2.6.39). I'm getting in nodes dmesg this kind of messages: (rmdir,19142,7):ocfs2_unlink:953 ERROR: status = -39 (rmdir,19305,10):ocfs2_unlink:953 ERROR: status = -39 (rmdir,19556,7):ocfs2_unlink:953 ERROR: status = -39 (rmdir,19561,11):ocfs2_unlink:953 ERROR: status = -39 (rmdir,19789,9):ocfs2_unlink:953 ERROR: status = -39 (rmdir,19868,11):ocfs2_unlink:953 ERROR: status = -39 Shoul...

...el: (8861,0):dlm_get_lock_resource:914 ERROR: status = -107 Mar 8 06:54:11 groupwise-1-mht kernel: (8854,3):ocfs2_broadcast_vote:725 ERROR: status = -107 Mar 8 06:54:11 groupwise-1-mht kernel: (8854,3):ocfs2_do_request_vote:798 ERROR: status = -107 Mar 8 06:54:11 groupwise-1-mht kernel: (8854,3):ocfs2_unlink:840 ERROR: status = -107 Mar 8 06:54:18 groupwise-1-mht kernel: (8855,0):ocfs2_broadcast_vote:725 ERROR: status = -107 Mar 8 06:54:18 groupwise-1-mht kernel: (8855,0):ocfs2_do_request_vote:798 ERROR: status = -107 Mar 8 06:54:18 groupwise-1-mht kernel: (8855,0):ocfs2_unlink:840 ERROR: status = -...

While removing a non-empty directory, the kernel dumps a message: (rmdir,21743,1):ocfs2_unlink:953 ERROR: status = -39 Suppress the error message from being printed in the dmesg so users don't panic. Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn at suse.com> --- diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c index 04ee1b5..33c7b91 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/name...

...th nodes bail out from ocfs2_delete_inode() with: Skipping delete of 100405 because it is in use on other nodes The scenario which I think is happening is as follows: node1 node2 rmdir("d"); ocfs2_remote_dentry_delete() ocfs2_dentry_convert_worker() finishes ocfs2_unlink() eventually enters ocfs2_delete_inode() ocfs2_inode_lock() ocfs2_query_inode_wipe() -> fail ocfs2_inode_unlock() ocfs2_dentry_post_unlock() ocfs2_drop_dentry_lock() iput() ocfs2_delete_inode() ocfs2_inode_lock() ocfs2_query_inode_w...

...dir_for_insert:4391 ERROR: status = -17 Apr 16 02:49:36 host1 kernel: (dtocatalogbr,5864,3):__ocfs2_prepare_orphan_dir:1932 ERROR: status = -17 Apr 16 02:49:36 host1 kernel: (dtocatalogbr,5864,3):ocfs2_prepare_orphan_dir:1973 ERROR: status = -17 Apr 16 02:49:36 host1 kernel: (dtocatalogbr,5864,3):ocfs2_unlink:887 ERROR: status = -17 #uname -a Linux host1 2.6.32-300.27.1.el6uek.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 19 14:21:30 EDT 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux #cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 (Santiago) #rpm -qa | grep ocfs ocfs2console-1.6.4-1.el6.x86_64 ocfs2-tools-devel...

Hello, the following series of patches fixes some issues with OCFS2 quotas. The first patch modifies VFS quota locking, the next patch uses the fact to simplify OCFS2 quota locking and solves a few deadlock issues. The third and the fourth patches fix another possible deadlocks in OCFS2 quota code and the last patch is a minor cleanup. Honza

Hi list, Here is a bug report on novell bugzilla (https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456280) that mount point inside node A can be removed from node B. The problem is, node B does not know an empty dir is be using as mount point on another node. Is there any solution to return -EBUSY when a dir is be using as mount point on another node ? Thanks in advance. -- Coly Li SuSE Labs

...on+0x12f/0x1a1 [<ffffffff81437ef2>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x19/0x1b [<ffffffff81437f5b>] mutex_lock+0x23/0x3a [<ffffffffa065ba1f>] ocfs2_lookup_lock_orphan_dir+0xb8/0x18a [ocfs2] [<ffffffffa065c7d5>] ocfs2_prepare_orphan_dir+0x3f/0x229 [ocfs2] [<ffffffffa0660bab>] ocfs2_unlink+0x523/0xa81 [ocfs2] [<ffffffff810425b3>] ? need_resched+0x23/0x2d [<ffffffff810425cb>] ? should_resched+0xe/0x2f [<ffffffff810425cb>] ? should_resched+0xe/0x2f [<ffffffff8116324d>] ? dquot_initialize+0x126/0x13d [<ffffffff810425b3>] ? need_resched+0x23/0x2d [<...

...[ocfs2] [<ffffffff804f387f>] ? _spin_unlock+0x26/0x2a [<ffffffffa02e59fb>] ? ocfs2_recovery_completed+0x34/0x3c [ocfs2] [<ffffffffa02d750c>] ocfs2_inode_lock_full+0x180/0xccb [ocfs2] [<ffffffff8025d97f>] ? print_lock_contention_bug+0x1e/0x110 [<ffffffffa02f0210>] ocfs2_unlink+0x1a3/0xa6e [ocfs2] [<ffffffff802c3686>] ? vfs_unlink+0x95/0x110 [<ffffffff802c36af>] vfs_unlink+0xbe/0x110 [<ffffffff802c5d46>] do_unlinkat+0xcd/0x15d [<ffffffff802be708>] ? sys_newlstat+0x31/0x3c [<ffffffff804f34fc>] ? lockdep_sys_exit_thunk+0x35/0x67 [<ffff...

Hi, here comes the next version of OCFS2 lockdep support. I've dropped patches with fixes from the series since they were already merged. As Joel suggested, I've simplified the main patch a bit so that we don't have ifdefs around lock declarations and there are also a few other minor improvements. Honza

Hi Linus, Here are some 2.6.20 fixes for ocfs2. The patch by Zhen Wei isn't really a fix, but a very small amount of support for a feature which is mostly implemented in ocfs2-tools. Considering it's just a single attribute export via configfs, I'd say it's pretty safe to merge. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of

The following patches implement indexed directory support in Ocfs2, mostly according to the design doc I wrote up a while ago: http://oss.oracle.com/osswiki/OCFS2/DesignDocs/IndexedDirectories The patches have been rebased on top of 2.6.29-rc2. It should be trivial to put them into merge_window. Things are what I'd call complete now. I'd like to get these into the merge_window branch

Hi, the first four patches in this series fix locking problems in OCFS2 quota code (three of them can lead to potential deadlocks). The fifth patch reorders ip_alloc_sem for directories to be acquired before localalloc locks. Mark would you please merge these? The last two patches implement lockdep annotations for OCFS2 cluster locks. We annotate all the cluster locks except for special ones

Hi, The following patches comprise the bulk of Ocfs2 updates for the 2.6.30 merge window. Aside from larger, more involved fixes, we're adding the following features, which I will describe in the order their patches are mailed. Sunil's exported some more state to our debugfs files, and consolidated some other aspects of our debugfs infrastructure. This will further aid us in debugging

Hi, I'm resending this patch series. It's rediffed against linux-next branch of Joel's git tree. The first four patches are obvious fixes of deadlocks in quota code and should go in as soon as possible. The other three patches implement lockdep support for OCFS2 cluster locks. So you can have a look whether the code make sence to you and possibly merge them. They should be NOP when

...ted+0x126/0x540 [ocfs2] > [<ffffffffa0a5922e>] ? ocfs2_lookup_lock_orphan_dir+0x6e/0x1b0 [ocfs2] > [<ffffffffa0a5922e>] ? ocfs2_lookup_lock_orphan_dir+0x6e/0x1b0 [ocfs2] > [<ffffffffa0a5ba1a>] ? ocfs2_prepare_orphan_dir+0x4a/0x290 [ocfs2] > [<ffffffffa0a5e621>] ? ocfs2_unlink+0x6e1/0xbb0 [ocfs2] > [<ffffffff811bcfea>] ? may_link+0xda/0x170 > [<ffffffff81141c8e>] ? vfs_unlink+0x9e/0x100 > [<ffffffff81145881>] ? do_unlinkat+0x1a1/0x1d0 > [<ffffffff81147b00>] ? vfs_readdir+0xa0/0xe0 > [<ffffffff8116fedb>] ? fsnotify_find_inode_m...

...ocfs2: Store the ocfs2_caching_info on ocfs2_extent_tree. ocfs2: Pass ocfs2_caching_info to ocfs2_read_extent_block(). ocfs2: ocfs2_find_path() only needs the caching info ocfs2: ocfs2_create_new_meta_bhs() doesn't need struct inode. ocfs2: Pass ocfs2_extent_tree to ocfs2_unlink_path() ocfs2: ocfs2_complete_edge_insert() doesn't need struct inode at all. ocfs2: Get inode out of ocfs2_rotate_subtree_root_right(). ocfs2: Pass ocfs2_extent_tree to ocfs2_get_subtree_root() ocfs2: Drop struct inode from ocfs2_extent_tree_operations. ocfs2: ocfs...

Hi all, So I have finally finished the v1 of reflink for ocfs2. It has some bugs that I am still investigating, but the schema is almost there. So I'd like to send it out first for review. And Tristan and I will continue to work on the stability of the code. The general information for reflink, please see http://oss.oracle.com/osswiki/OCFS2/DesignDocs/Reflink. For the design doc, please

Hi all, Change from v1 to v2: bug fix and metadata/credits reservation improvement. The general information for reflink, please see http://oss.oracle.com/osswiki/OCFS2/DesignDocs/Reflink. For the design doc, please see http://oss.oracle.com/osswiki/OCFS2/DesignDocs/RefcountTrees http://oss.oracle.com/osswiki/OCFS2/DesignDocs/ReflinkOperation

Hi all, So I have finally finished the v3 of reflink for ocfs2. The biggest change is that we support 64bit cluster offset now(Thank Mark and Joel for it). [View] http://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=tma/linux-2.6.git;a=shortlog;h=refcount [Pull] git://oss.oracle.com/git/tma/linux-2.6.git refcount The general information for reflink, please see http://oss.oracle.com/osswiki/OCFS2/DesignDocs/Reflink.