Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "nx_probe".
Did you mean:
nv_probe
2020 Jun 16
0
[PATCH v5 2/2] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()
...nx_ctx->csbcpb = NULL;
nx_ctx->csbcpb_aead = NULL;
nx_ctx->in_sg = NULL;
@@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ void nx_crypto_ctx_aead_exit(struct crypto_aead *tfm)
{
struct nx_crypto_ctx *nx_ctx = crypto_aead_ctx(tfm);
- kzfree(nx_ctx->kmem);
+ kfree_sensitive(nx_ctx->kmem);
}
static int nx_probe(struct vio_dev *viodev, const struct vio_device_id *id)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c
index cb8a6ea2a4bc..930fc802d399 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c
@@ -...
2020 Apr 13
0
[PATCH 1/2] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()
...nx_ctx->csbcpb = NULL;
nx_ctx->csbcpb_aead = NULL;
nx_ctx->in_sg = NULL;
@@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ void nx_crypto_ctx_aead_exit(struct crypto_aead *tfm)
{
struct nx_crypto_ctx *nx_ctx = crypto_aead_ctx(tfm);
- kzfree(nx_ctx->kmem);
+ kfree_sensitive(nx_ctx->kmem);
}
static int nx_probe(struct vio_dev *viodev, const struct vio_device_id *id)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c
index fd045e64972a..bc575d63dee6 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c
@@ -...
2020 Jun 16
0
[PATCH v4 2/3] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()
...nx_ctx->csbcpb = NULL;
nx_ctx->csbcpb_aead = NULL;
nx_ctx->in_sg = NULL;
@@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ void nx_crypto_ctx_aead_exit(struct crypto_aead *tfm)
{
struct nx_crypto_ctx *nx_ctx = crypto_aead_ctx(tfm);
- kzfree(nx_ctx->kmem);
+ kfree_sensitive(nx_ctx->kmem);
}
static int nx_probe(struct vio_dev *viodev, const struct vio_device_id *id)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c
index cb8a6ea2a4bc..930fc802d399 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c
@@ -...
2020 Jun 16
3
[PATCH v5 0/2] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()
v5:
- Break the btrfs patch out as a separate patch to be processed
independently.
- Update the commit log of patch 1 to make it less scary.
- Add a kzfree backward compatibility macro in patch 2.
v4:
- Break out the memzero_explicit() change as suggested by Dan Carpenter
so that it can be backported to stable.
- Drop the "crypto: Remove unnecessary
2020 Jun 16
14
[PATCH v4 0/3] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()
v4:
- Break out the memzero_explicit() change as suggested by Dan Carpenter
so that it can be backported to stable.
- Drop the "crypto: Remove unnecessary memzero_explicit()" patch for
now as there can be a bit more discussion on what is best. It will be
introduced as a separate patch later on after this one is merged.
This patchset makes a global rename of the kzfree()
2020 Jun 16
14
[PATCH v4 0/3] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()
v4:
- Break out the memzero_explicit() change as suggested by Dan Carpenter
so that it can be backported to stable.
- Drop the "crypto: Remove unnecessary memzero_explicit()" patch for
now as there can be a bit more discussion on what is best. It will be
introduced as a separate patch later on after this one is merged.
This patchset makes a global rename of the kzfree()
2020 Apr 13
10
[PATCH 0/2] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()
This patchset makes a global rename of the kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()
to highlight the fact buffer clearing is only needed if the data objects
contain sensitive information like encrpytion key. The fact that kzfree()
uses memset() to do the clearing isn't totally safe either as compiler
may compile out the clearing in their optimizer. Instead, the new
kfree_sensitive() uses