search for: nvpo

...image from swap > > > device. I guess you have resume=... in the kernel command line. > > > > > > > But after a short while it gets pretty busy: > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 52.917009] No Local Variables are initialized for Method [NVPO] > > > > [ 52.917011] No Arguments are initialized for method [NVPO] > > > > [ 52.917012] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) > > > > [ 52.917063] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution...

...poke at a wrong b:d.f by mistake > > > maybe ... > > > > Or it the power resource is shared by wifi as well. > > Is there a way to find out through e.g. sysfs? It is not shared, I checked from the acpidump you provided. Possibly the infinite loop in AML when executing NVPO method have some effect on this. [snip] > > No need to send, I can read it from the bugzilla just fine. Can you attach > > acpidump there as well? > > Done. lspci -x too just in case. Looking at the dmesg: [ 52.917009] No Local Variables are initialized for Method [NVPO] [...

...gt; > > maybe ... > > > > > > Or it the power resource is shared by wifi as well. > > > > Is there a way to find out through e.g. sysfs? > > It is not shared, I checked from the acpidump you provided. Possibly the > infinite loop in AML when executing NVPO method have some effect on > this. > > [snip] > > > > No need to send, I can read it from the bugzilla just fine. Can you attach > > > acpidump there as well? > > > > Done. lspci -x too just in case. > > Looking at the dmesg: > > [ 52.917...

...; > > > > > > Or it the power resource is shared by wifi as well. > > > > > > Is there a way to find out through e.g. sysfs? > > > > It is not shared, I checked from the acpidump you provided. Possibly the > > infinite loop in AML when executing NVPO method have some effect on > > this. > > > > [snip] > > > > > > No need to send, I can read it from the bugzilla just fine. Can you attach > > > > acpidump there as well? > > > > > > Done. lspci -x too just in case. > > > &g...

...es [ 4.510144] [drm] Initialized nouveau 1.3.1 20120801 for 0000:01:00.0 on minor 2 Although that type mismatch is a bit worrying. And I'm not sure what prints PM: Image not found. But after a short while it gets pretty busy: [ 52.917009] No Local Variables are initialized for Method [NVPO] [ 52.917011] No Arguments are initialized for method [NVPO] [ 52.917012] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917063] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PGON, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse...

...gt; That is fine, it just says it cannot find a hibernation image from swap > device. I guess you have resume=... in the kernel command line. > > > But after a short while it gets pretty busy: > > > > > > [ 52.917009] No Local Variables are initialized for Method [NVPO] > > [ 52.917011] No Arguments are initialized for method [NVPO] > > [ 52.917012] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) > > [ 52.917063] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PGON, AE_AML_...

...> prints PM: Image not found. That is fine, it just says it cannot find a hibernation image from swap device. I guess you have resume=... in the kernel command line. > But after a short while it gets pretty busy: > > > [ 52.917009] No Local Variables are initialized for Method [NVPO] > [ 52.917011] No Arguments are initialized for method [NVPO] > [ 52.917012] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) > [ 52.917063] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PGON, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (2...

...it cannot find a hibernation image from swap > > device. I guess you have resume=... in the kernel command line. > > > > > But after a short while it gets pretty busy: > > > > > > > > > [ 52.917009] No Local Variables are initialized for Method [NVPO] > > > [ 52.917011] No Arguments are initialized for method [NVPO] > > > [ 52.917012] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) > > > [ 52.917063] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI...

...es [ 4.510144] [drm] Initialized nouveau 1.3.1 20120801 for 0000:01:00.0 on minor 2 Although that type mismatch is a bit worrying. And I'm not sure what prints PM: Image not found. But after a short while it gets pretty busy: [ 52.917009] No Local Variables are initialized for Method [NVPO] [ 52.917011] No Arguments are initialized for method [NVPO] [ 52.917012] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917063] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PGON, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse...

...fixed things, hooray!" but it seems that after > trying runtime suspend/resume a couple times things fall apart again: You mean $subject patch, no? > [ 686.883247] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: suspending object tree... > [ 752.866484] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO due to previous error (AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT) (20190816/psparse-529) > [ 752.866508] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.PGON due to previous error (AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT) (20190816/psparse-529) > [ 752.866521] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PG00._ON due to previous error (AE_AML_...

...e, that > the GPU disappeared. Later testing also showed that my patch also > didn't seem to help with this error sadly :/ > > > > [ 686.883247] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: suspending object tree... > > > [ 752.866484] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO due > > > to previous error (AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT) (20190816/psparse-529) > > > [ 752.866508] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.PGON due to > > > previous error (AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT) (20190816/psparse-529) > > > [ 752.866521] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB...

...testing also showed that my patch also > > > didn't seem to help with this error sadly :/ > > > > > > > > [ 686.883247] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: suspending object tree... > > > > > [ 752.866484] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO due > > > > > to previous error (AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT) (20190816/psparse-529) > > > > > [ 752.866508] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.PGON due to > > > > > previous error (AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT) (20190816/psparse-529) > > > > > [ 752....

...Lgbc29pEXgOrQn0Tr 4JJXuBDyYsvGupLOrKP/c7gBPLYsCHUl9XfRoBKEelM8rQFBbLz3xtxvZuGzNlH9 +4uZ3EvqJ7LuN4cZH9xCqYQHbbXdk5/CXo8OKoz0Nw4FTk/wWSZicEJ/AqCof+be GlEFvlKrPY+NaoLH4l0zf27Lff6k1oaYLnxEMMcvOXaqYPLhK2gvQeBhh43GiIBJ 6fTER9WRtW/RfvzBmnpvI850f1Ws8qfF/gbbGLOqwL8d7WOeHgeQ7SPdnhLFhHYE JPHXBlT9rFqT28M4Z9QJ =NVPO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

...till caused the same issue, that the GPU disappeared. Later testing also showed that my patch also didn't seem to help with this error sadly :/ > > [ 686.883247] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: suspending object tree... > > [ 752.866484] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO due to previous error (AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT) (20190816/psparse-529) > > [ 752.866508] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.PGON due to previous error (AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT) (20190816/psparse-529) > > [ 752.866521] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PG00._ON due to previous erro...

...U disappeared. Later testing also showed that my patch also > > didn't seem to help with this error sadly :/ > > > > > > [ 686.883247] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: suspending object tree... > > > > [ 752.866484] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO due > > > > to previous error (AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT) (20190816/psparse-529) > > > > [ 752.866508] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.PGON due to > > > > previous error (AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT) (20190816/psparse-529) > > > > [ 752.866521] ACPI Error:...

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 5:06 PM Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 4:47 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael at kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:53 PM Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:46 PM Mika Westerberg > > > <mika.westerberg at

...kAbiwR1CD+8mG9SpYrv5HhIO8WZpYNDLT5LRHS5QMI+qkI1DyL4hCXi9Kn8cHy6Uqmqk YqYUgQUOJYFeMEtqKJUaqgNjqbQPpIM9EhipA8Op4SAw6gPDw4E5EqhTG0kFgeNh7XWM9StZp794 bqjftPBa+9taW/6x1jJUa188e3rcmh78+XStdQdqbfVPo/bT8u2FfWy55LaF88dHp2OecZ/Wi2ce 7a+eNpmbYLhMIFfHYZVXqHRWBqHUlWWSAwVfiq/emalpd+5UngCbrWspcF3Qfel0Or8mktTlPKm3 nVPO+EM/EmKrkEgi+SL5Ivki+SL5Ivki+f5/8ilh2sjX2SjK25TK6w0/nY249yxV3Kif3uFJBN7j tbbpWl5b5Q7albcGeWNFtpt/TAoOLO7lBYm3eZmEOwZUB7asMD6o1ykU8Y7nd2ur7LfjXpsO4Xee Nx83ro+rce488ujH/Hk704H+BEgW8yTrVILr+rwOijn1qja5XQsn/6m/R6e+fPldaerl1+NLv/38 auqPf36Z/+n3X2FcSMw2NwZf3LNfErzJ4SfZiNMcJumRvOpdCxBlRVIh8o85Xtd16DLlnVmws...

...M: evicting buffers... [ 686.873656] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: waiting for kernel channels to go idle... [ 686.873676] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: suspending fence... [ 686.883247] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: suspending object tree... [ 752.866484] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO due to previous error (AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT) (20190816/psparse-529) [ 752.866508] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.PGON due to previous error (AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT) (20190816/psparse-529) [ 752.866521] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PG00._ON due to previous error (AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEO...

Hi All I have dozens of these messages on CLI complaining about database connection and error writing CDR to disk. The curious thing is I can find them all inside the database. I "selected" them using uniqueid and manually compared each column with the cdr_adaptive_odbc.c error line. "mysqlcheck -a -e -v DBase" and "mysqlcheck -c -e -v DBase" both returned OK for