Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "nvdef".
Did you mean:
vdef
2020 Aug 10
3
[PATCH 0/2] drm/nouveau: Small CRC fixes for 5.9
Just two CRC related fixes for the new CRC functionality in 5.9. One of
these unbreaks CRC reporting on volta+, which accidentally got broken
when converting over to nvidia's class headers. The other simply removes
an unneeded CRC method call that's been hiding in head907d_mode() for
quite a while now.
Lyude Paul (2):
drm/nouveau/kms/nv140-: Include correct push header in crcc37d.c
2020 Sep 04
3
[PATCH v5 1/2] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
...ouveau_drm *drm, struct nv50_disp *disp)
+core507d_read_caps(struct nv50_disp *disp)
{
struct nvif_push *push = disp->core->chan.push;
int ret;
- if ((ret = PUSH_WAIT(push, 2)))
+ ret = PUSH_WAIT(push, 6);
+ if (ret)
return ret;
+ PUSH_MTHD(push, NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL,
+ NVDEF(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, MODE, WRITE) |
+ NVVAL(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, OFFSET, NV50_DISP_CORE_NTFY >> 2) |
+ NVDEF(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, NOTIFY, ENABLE));
+
PUSH_MTHD(push, NV507D, GET_CAPABILITIES, 0x00000000);
+
+ PUSH_MTHD(push, NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL,
+...
2020 Sep 01
3
[PATCH v3] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
...drm, struct nv50_disp *disp)
+core507d_read_caps(struct nv50_disp *disp, u32 offset)
{
struct nvif_push *push = disp->core->chan.push;
int ret;
- if ((ret = PUSH_WAIT(push, 2)))
+ ret = PUSH_WAIT(push, 4);
+ if (ret)
return ret;
+ PUSH_MTHD(push, NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL,
+ NVDEF(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, MODE, WRITE) |
+ NVVAL(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, OFFSET, offset >> 2) |
+ NVDEF(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, NOTIFY, ENABLE));
PUSH_MTHD(push, NV507D, GET_CAPABILITIES, 0x00000000);
+
return PUSH_KICK(push);
}
+int
+core507d_caps_init(struct nou...
2020 Sep 01
0
[PATCH v4] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
...drm, struct nv50_disp *disp)
+core507d_read_caps(struct nv50_disp *disp, u32 offset)
{
struct nvif_push *push = disp->core->chan.push;
int ret;
- if ((ret = PUSH_WAIT(push, 2)))
+ ret = PUSH_WAIT(push, 4);
+ if (ret)
return ret;
+ PUSH_MTHD(push, NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL,
+ NVDEF(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, MODE, WRITE) |
+ NVVAL(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, OFFSET, offset >> 2) |
+ NVDEF(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, NOTIFY, ENABLE));
PUSH_MTHD(push, NV507D, GET_CAPABILITIES, 0x00000000);
+
return PUSH_KICK(push);
}
+int
+core507d_caps_init(struct nou...
2020 Nov 14
0
[PATCH 2/8] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Remove (nv_encoder->crtc) checks in ->disable callbacks
.../disp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
@@ -460,8 +460,8 @@ nv50_dac_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
struct nouveau_encoder *nv_encoder = nouveau_encoder(encoder);
struct nv50_core *core = nv50_disp(encoder->dev)->core;
const u32 ctrl = NVDEF(NV507D, DAC_SET_CONTROL, OWNER, NONE);
- if (nv_encoder->crtc)
- core->func->dac->ctrl(core, nv_encoder->or, ctrl, NULL);
+
+ core->func->dac->ctrl(core, nv_encoder->or, ctrl, NULL);
nv_encoder->crtc = NULL;
nv50_outp_release(nv_encoder);
}
@@ -1620,28 +1620,25 @...
2020 Aug 24
4
[PATCH 0/2] drm/nouveau: Backport SOR/PIOR probing fixes for v5.8
These didn't apply cleanly to v5.8, so here's a backported version.
Lyude Paul (2):
drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp
caps
drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Log SOR/PIOR caps
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 10 +++++++++
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
2020 Aug 06
3
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
...7d.c
@@ -80,11 +80,19 @@ core507d_caps_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct nv50_disp *disp)
struct nvif_push *push = disp->core->chan.push;
int ret;
- if ((ret = PUSH_WAIT(push, 2)))
+ if ((ret = PUSH_WAIT(push, 4)))
return ret;
+ PUSH_MTHD(push, NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL,
+ NVDEF(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, MODE, WRITE) |
+ NVVAL(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, OFFSET, NV50_DISP_CORE_NTFY >> 2) |
+ NVDEF(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, NOTIFY, ENABLE));
PUSH_MTHD(push, NV507D, GET_CAPABILITIES, 0x00000000);
- return PUSH_KICK(push);
+ ret = PUSH_KICK(push);
+ if...
2020 Aug 07
4
[PATCH v2 1/2] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
...disp->core->chan.push;
+ u32 interlock[NV50_DISP_INTERLOCK__SIZE] = {0};
int ret;
- if ((ret = PUSH_WAIT(push, 2)))
+ core->func->ntfy_init(disp->sync, NV50_DISP_CORE_NTFY);
+
+ if ((ret = PUSH_WAIT(push, 4)))
return ret;
+ PUSH_MTHD(push, NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL,
+ NVDEF(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, MODE, WRITE) |
+ NVVAL(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, OFFSET, NV50_DISP_CORE_NTFY >> 2) |
+ NVDEF(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, NOTIFY, ENABLE));
PUSH_MTHD(push, NV507D, GET_CAPABILITIES, 0x00000000);
- return PUSH_KICK(push);
+
+ ret = PUSH_KICK(push);
+...
2023 Jul 12
8
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
Hello,
while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly
irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev"
because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer.
I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev".
I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine
for me,
2023 Jul 12
8
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
Hello,
while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly
irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev"
because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer.
I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev".
I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine
for me,