Lyude Paul
2020-Aug-06 23:01 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this
(maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc
appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver
init, at least on my ThinkPad P72:
nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: chid 0 mthd 008c data 00000000 0000508c 0000102b
This is magic nvidia speak for "You need to have the DMA notifier offset
programmed before you can call NV507D_GET_CAPABILITIES." So, let's fix
this by doing that.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
Fixes: 4a2cb4181b07 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Probe SOR and PIOR caps for DP
interlacing support")
Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org> # v5.8+
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
index ad1f09a143aa4..c984080ce99f2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
@@ -80,11 +80,19 @@ core507d_caps_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct nv50_disp
*disp)
struct nvif_push *push = disp->core->chan.push;
int ret;
- if ((ret = PUSH_WAIT(push, 2)))
+ if ((ret = PUSH_WAIT(push, 4)))
return ret;
+ PUSH_MTHD(push, NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL,
+ NVDEF(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, MODE, WRITE) |
+ NVVAL(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, OFFSET, NV50_DISP_CORE_NTFY >> 2)
|
+ NVDEF(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, NOTIFY, ENABLE));
PUSH_MTHD(push, NV507D, GET_CAPABILITIES, 0x00000000);
- return PUSH_KICK(push);
+ ret = PUSH_KICK(push);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
}
int
--
2.26.2
Sasha Levin
2020-Aug-13 16:25 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
Hi
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
fixing commit: 4a2cb4181b07 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Probe SOR and PIOR
caps for DP interlacing support").
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.8.
v5.8: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
3c43c362b3a5 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: convert core caps_init() to new
push macros")
5e691222eac6 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: convert core init() to new push
macros")
d8b24526ef68 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: use NVIDIA's headers for core
caps_init()")
NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
How should we proceed with this patch?
--
Thanks
Sasha
Sasha Levin
2020-Aug-19 23:56 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
Hi
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
fixing commit: 4a2cb4181b07 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Probe SOR and PIOR
caps for DP interlacing support").
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.8.1.
v5.8.1: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
3c43c362b3a5 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: convert core caps_init() to new
push macros")
5e691222eac6 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: convert core init() to new push
macros")
d8b24526ef68 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: use NVIDIA's headers for core
caps_init()")
NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
How should we proceed with this patch?
--
Thanks
Sasha
Sasha Levin
2020-Aug-26 13:53 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
Hi
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
fixing commit: 4a2cb4181b07 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Probe SOR and PIOR
caps for DP interlacing support").
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.8.2.
v5.8.2: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
3c43c362b3a5 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: convert core caps_init() to new
push macros")
5e691222eac6 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: convert core init() to new push
macros")
d8b24526ef68 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: use NVIDIA's headers for core
caps_init()")
NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
How should we proceed with this patch?
--
Thanks
Sasha
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
- [PATCH v5 1/2] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
- [PATCH v3] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
- [PATCH v4] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
- [PATCH 0/2] drm/nouveau: Backport SOR/PIOR probing fixes for v5.8