Lyude Paul
2020-Aug-06 23:01 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this (maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver init, at least on my ThinkPad P72: nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: chid 0 mthd 008c data 00000000 0000508c 0000102b This is magic nvidia speak for "You need to have the DMA notifier offset programmed before you can call NV507D_GET_CAPABILITIES." So, let's fix this by doing that. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> Fixes: 4a2cb4181b07 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Probe SOR and PIOR caps for DP interlacing support") Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org> # v5.8+ --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c index ad1f09a143aa4..c984080ce99f2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c @@ -80,11 +80,19 @@ core507d_caps_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct nv50_disp *disp) struct nvif_push *push = disp->core->chan.push; int ret; - if ((ret = PUSH_WAIT(push, 2))) + if ((ret = PUSH_WAIT(push, 4))) return ret; + PUSH_MTHD(push, NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, + NVDEF(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, MODE, WRITE) | + NVVAL(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, OFFSET, NV50_DISP_CORE_NTFY >> 2) | + NVDEF(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, NOTIFY, ENABLE)); PUSH_MTHD(push, NV507D, GET_CAPABILITIES, 0x00000000); - return PUSH_KICK(push); + ret = PUSH_KICK(push); + if (ret) + return ret; + + return 0; } int -- 2.26.2
Sasha Levin
2020-Aug-13 16:25 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
Hi [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag fixing commit: 4a2cb4181b07 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Probe SOR and PIOR caps for DP interlacing support"). The bot has tested the following trees: v5.8. v5.8: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 3c43c362b3a5 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: convert core caps_init() to new push macros") 5e691222eac6 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: convert core init() to new push macros") d8b24526ef68 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: use NVIDIA's headers for core caps_init()") NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream. How should we proceed with this patch? -- Thanks Sasha
Sasha Levin
2020-Aug-19 23:56 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
Hi [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag fixing commit: 4a2cb4181b07 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Probe SOR and PIOR caps for DP interlacing support"). The bot has tested the following trees: v5.8.1. v5.8.1: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 3c43c362b3a5 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: convert core caps_init() to new push macros") 5e691222eac6 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: convert core init() to new push macros") d8b24526ef68 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: use NVIDIA's headers for core caps_init()") NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream. How should we proceed with this patch? -- Thanks Sasha
Sasha Levin
2020-Aug-26 13:53 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
Hi [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag fixing commit: 4a2cb4181b07 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Probe SOR and PIOR caps for DP interlacing support"). The bot has tested the following trees: v5.8.2. v5.8.2: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 3c43c362b3a5 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: convert core caps_init() to new push macros") 5e691222eac6 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: convert core init() to new push macros") d8b24526ef68 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: use NVIDIA's headers for core caps_init()") NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream. How should we proceed with this patch? -- Thanks Sasha
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
- [PATCH v5 1/2] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
- [PATCH v3] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
- [PATCH v4] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
- [PATCH 0/2] drm/nouveau: Backport SOR/PIOR probing fixes for v5.8