Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "nv50_head_crc_late_regist".
Did you mean:
nv50_head_crc_late_register
2020 Jul 27
1
[PATCH -next] crc:Fix build errors
If CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU=y,the following errors
are seen while building crc.h.
In file included from /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c:47:
/scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h: In function ?nv50_head_crc_late_register?:
/scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h:109:47: error: parameter name omitted
static inline int nv50_head_crc_late_register(struct nv50_head *) {}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h:109:54: warni...
2020 Jul 27
0
[PATCH -next] crc:Fix build errors
...07-27 at 12:00 +0800, Peng Wu wrote:
> If CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU=y,the following errors
> are seen while building crc.h.
>
> In file included from
> /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c:47:
> /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h: In function
> ?nv50_head_crc_late_register?:
> /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h:109:47: error:
> parameter name omitted
> static inline int nv50_head_crc_late_register(struct nv50_head *) {}
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dis...
2020 Jul 20
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Fix CRC-related compile errors with debugfs disabled
...s like I made the mistake of forgetting to check whether or not this
would build without CONFIG_DEBUG_FS, as the Kbuild bot reported some
issues building with tegra_defconfig:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c:47:
./drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h: In function
?nv50_head_crc_late_register?:
./drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h:106:47: error: parameter name
omitted
106 | static inline int nv50_head_crc_late_register(struct nv50_head *) {}
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h:106:54: warning: no retur...
2020 Jul 21
0
[PATCH -next] drm/nouveau/kms/nvd9-: Fix file release memory leak
...v50/crc.c
> @@ -706,6 +706,7 @@ static const struct file_operations
> nv50_crc_flip_threshold_fops = {
> .open = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_open,
> .read = seq_read,
> .write = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_set,
> + .release = single_release,
> };
>
> int nv50_head_crc_late_register(struct nv50_head *head)
>
>
>
--
Cheers,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Software Engineer at Red Hat
2020 Jun 22
0
[RFC v5 10/10] drm/nouveau/kms/nvd9-: Add CRC support
...t = len;
+
+out:
+ drm_modeset_unlock(&crtc->mutex);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations nv50_crc_flip_threshold_fops = {
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .open = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_open,
+ .read = seq_read,
+ .write = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_set,
+};
+
+int nv50_head_crc_late_register(struct nv50_head *head)
+{
+ struct drm_crtc *crtc = &head->base.base;
+ const struct nv50_crc_func *func =
+ nv50_disp(crtc->dev)->core->func->crc;
+ struct dentry *root;
+
+ if (!func || !crtc->debugfs_entry)
+ return 0;
+
+ root = debugfs_create_dir("nv_crc",...
2020 Apr 17
0
[RFC v3 11/11] drm/nouveau/kms/nvd9-: Add CRC support
...t = len;
+
+out:
+ drm_modeset_unlock(&crtc->mutex);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations nv50_crc_flip_threshold_fops = {
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .open = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_open,
+ .read = seq_read,
+ .write = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_set,
+};
+
+int nv50_head_crc_late_register(struct nv50_head *head)
+{
+ struct drm_crtc *crtc = &head->base.base;
+ const struct nv50_crc_func *func =
+ nv50_disp(crtc->dev)->core->func->crc;
+ struct dentry *root;
+
+ if (!func || !crtc->debugfs_entry)
+ return 0;
+
+ root = debugfs_create_dir("nv_crc",...
2020 May 08
0
[RFC v4 12/12] drm/nouveau/kms/nvd9-: Add CRC support
...t = len;
+
+out:
+ drm_modeset_unlock(&crtc->mutex);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations nv50_crc_flip_threshold_fops = {
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .open = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_open,
+ .read = seq_read,
+ .write = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_set,
+};
+
+int nv50_head_crc_late_register(struct nv50_head *head)
+{
+ struct drm_crtc *crtc = &head->base.base;
+ const struct nv50_crc_func *func =
+ nv50_disp(crtc->dev)->core->func->crc;
+ struct dentry *root;
+
+ if (!func || !crtc->debugfs_entry)
+ return 0;
+
+ root = debugfs_create_dir("nv_crc",...
2020 Mar 18
0
[PATCH 9/9] drm/nouveau/kms/nvd9-: Add CRC support
...t = len;
+
+out:
+ drm_modeset_unlock(&crtc->mutex);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations nv50_crc_flip_threshold_fops = {
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .open = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_open,
+ .read = seq_read,
+ .write = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_set,
+};
+
+int nv50_head_crc_late_register(struct nv50_head *head)
+{
+ struct drm_crtc *crtc = &head->base.base;
+ const struct nv50_crc_func *func =
+ nv50_disp(crtc->dev)->core->func->crc;
+ struct dentry *root, *dent;
+
+ if (!func || !crtc->debugfs_entry)
+ return 0;
+
+ root = debugfs_create_dir("nv_crc&...
2020 Jun 22
13
[RFC v5 00/10] drm/nouveau: Introduce CRC support for gf119+
Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their
GPUs, hooray!
So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with
adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools
tests (already on the ML).
First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and
then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up
2020 Apr 17
9
[RFC v3 00/11] drm/nouveau: Introduce CRC support for gf119+
Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their
GPUs, hooray!
So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with
adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools
tests that we'll be sending in just a short bit.
This additionally adds a feature that Ville Syrj?l? came up with: vblank
works. Basically, this is just a generic DRM
2020 Mar 18
12
[PATCH 0/9] drm/nouveau: Introduce CRC support for gf119+
Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their
GPUs, hooray!
So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with
adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools
tests that we'll be sending in just a short bit.
This additionally adds a feature that Ville Syrj?l? came up with: vblank
works. Basically, this is just a generic DRM
2020 Jun 27
9
[RFC v8 0/9] drm/nouveau: Introduce CRC support for gf119+
Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their
GPUs, hooray!
So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with
adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools
tests (already on the ML).
First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and
then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up
2020 May 08
16
[RFC v4 00/12] drm/nouveau: Introduce CRC support for gf119+
Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their
GPUs, hooray!
So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with
adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools
tests (already on the ML).
First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and
then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up
2020 Jun 24
13
[RFC v7 00/11] drm/nouveau: Introduce CRC support for gf119+
Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their
GPUs, hooray!
So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with
adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools
tests (already on the ML).
First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and
then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up
2023 Jul 12
8
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
Hello,
while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly
irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev"
because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer.
I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev".
I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine
for me,
2023 Jul 12
8
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
Hello,
while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly
irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev"
because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer.
I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev".
I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine
for me,