search for: nv50_head_crc_late_register

If CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU=y,the following errors are seen while building crc.h. In file included from /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c:47: /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h: In function ?nv50_head_crc_late_register?: /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h:109:47: error: parameter name omitted static inline int nv50_head_crc_late_register(struct nv50_head *) {} ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h:109:54: warning...

...07-27 at 12:00 +0800, Peng Wu wrote: > If CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU=y,the following errors > are seen while building crc.h. > > In file included from > /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c:47: > /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h: In function > ?nv50_head_crc_late_register?: > /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h:109:47: error: > parameter name omitted > static inline int nv50_head_crc_late_register(struct nv50_head *) {} > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispn...

...s like I made the mistake of forgetting to check whether or not this would build without CONFIG_DEBUG_FS, as the Kbuild bot reported some issues building with tegra_defconfig: In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c:47: ./drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h: In function ?nv50_head_crc_late_register?: ./drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h:106:47: error: parameter name omitted 106 | static inline int nv50_head_crc_late_register(struct nv50_head *) {} | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h:106:54: warning: no return...

...v50/crc.c > @@ -706,6 +706,7 @@ static const struct file_operations > nv50_crc_flip_threshold_fops = { > .open = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_open, > .read = seq_read, > .write = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_set, > + .release = single_release, > }; > > int nv50_head_crc_late_register(struct nv50_head *head) > > > -- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat

...t = len; + +out: + drm_modeset_unlock(&crtc->mutex); + return ret; +} + +static const struct file_operations nv50_crc_flip_threshold_fops = { + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .open = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_open, + .read = seq_read, + .write = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_set, +}; + +int nv50_head_crc_late_register(struct nv50_head *head) +{ + struct drm_crtc *crtc = &head->base.base; + const struct nv50_crc_func *func = + nv50_disp(crtc->dev)->core->func->crc; + struct dentry *root; + + if (!func || !crtc->debugfs_entry) + return 0; + + root = debugfs_create_dir("nv_crc", cr...

...t = len; + +out: + drm_modeset_unlock(&crtc->mutex); + return ret; +} + +static const struct file_operations nv50_crc_flip_threshold_fops = { + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .open = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_open, + .read = seq_read, + .write = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_set, +}; + +int nv50_head_crc_late_register(struct nv50_head *head) +{ + struct drm_crtc *crtc = &head->base.base; + const struct nv50_crc_func *func = + nv50_disp(crtc->dev)->core->func->crc; + struct dentry *root; + + if (!func || !crtc->debugfs_entry) + return 0; + + root = debugfs_create_dir("nv_crc", cr...

...t = len; + +out: + drm_modeset_unlock(&crtc->mutex); + return ret; +} + +static const struct file_operations nv50_crc_flip_threshold_fops = { + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .open = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_open, + .read = seq_read, + .write = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_set, +}; + +int nv50_head_crc_late_register(struct nv50_head *head) +{ + struct drm_crtc *crtc = &head->base.base; + const struct nv50_crc_func *func = + nv50_disp(crtc->dev)->core->func->crc; + struct dentry *root; + + if (!func || !crtc->debugfs_entry) + return 0; + + root = debugfs_create_dir("nv_crc", cr...

...t = len; + +out: + drm_modeset_unlock(&crtc->mutex); + return ret; +} + +static const struct file_operations nv50_crc_flip_threshold_fops = { + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .open = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_open, + .read = seq_read, + .write = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_set, +}; + +int nv50_head_crc_late_register(struct nv50_head *head) +{ + struct drm_crtc *crtc = &head->base.base; + const struct nv50_crc_func *func = + nv50_disp(crtc->dev)->core->func->crc; + struct dentry *root, *dent; + + if (!func || !crtc->debugfs_entry) + return 0; + + root = debugfs_create_dir("nv_crc&qu...

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests that we'll be sending in just a short bit. This additionally adds a feature that Ville Syrj?l? came up with: vblank works. Basically, this is just a generic DRM

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests that we'll be sending in just a short bit. This additionally adds a feature that Ville Syrj?l? came up with: vblank works. Basically, this is just a generic DRM

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

Hello, while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev". I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine for me,

Hello, while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev". I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine for me,