Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "nv50_disp_core_ntfi".
Did you mean:
nv50_disp_core_ntfy
2020 Aug 24
2
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 04:33, Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this
> (maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc
> appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver
> init, at least on my ThinkPad P72:
>
> nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: chid 0 mthd
2020 Sep 04
3
[PATCH v5 1/2] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this
(maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc
appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver
init, at least on my ThinkPad P72:
nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: chid 0 mthd 008c data 00000000 0000508c 0000102b
This is magic nvidia speak for "You need to have the DMA notifier
2020 Aug 31
1
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 02:52, Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 08:28 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 04:33, Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this
> > > (maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc
2020 Aug 24
4
[PATCH 0/2] drm/nouveau: Backport SOR/PIOR probing fixes for v5.8
These didn't apply cleanly to v5.8, so here's a backported version.
Lyude Paul (2):
drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp
caps
drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Log SOR/PIOR caps
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 10 +++++++++
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
2020 Aug 24
0
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this
(maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc
appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver
init, at least on my ThinkPad P72:
nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: chid 0 mthd 008c data 00000000 0000508c 0000102b
This is magic nvidia speak for "You need to have the DMA notifier
2020 Aug 25
0
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 08:28 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 04:33, Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this
> > (maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc
> > appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver
> > init, at
2020 Aug 07
4
[PATCH v2 1/2] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this
(maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc
appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver
init, at least on my ThinkPad P72:
nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: chid 0 mthd 008c data 00000000 0000508c 0000102b
This is magic nvidia speak for "You need to have the DMA notifier
2020 Sep 01
3
[PATCH v3] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this
(maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc
appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver
init, at least on my ThinkPad P72:
nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: chid 0 mthd 008c data 00000000 0000508c 0000102b
This is magic nvidia speak for "You need to have the DMA notifier
2020 Aug 06
3
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this
(maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc
appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver
init, at least on my ThinkPad P72:
nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: chid 0 mthd 008c data 00000000 0000508c 0000102b
This is magic nvidia speak for "You need to have the DMA notifier
2020 Sep 01
0
[PATCH v4] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps
Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this
(maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc
appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver
init, at least on my ThinkPad P72:
nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: chid 0 mthd 008c data 00000000 0000508c 0000102b
This is magic nvidia speak for "You need to have the DMA notifier
2020 Feb 14
5
[PATCH v2 0/5] drm/nouveau: DP interlace fixes
Currently, nouveau doesn't actually bother to try probing whether or not
it can actually handle interlaced modes over DisplayPort. As a result,
on volta and later we'll end up trying to set an interlaced mode even
when it's not supported and cause the front end for the display engine
to hang.
So, let's teach nouveau to reject interlaced modes on hardware that
can't actually
2020 May 11
6
[PATCH v3 0/5] drm/nouveau: DP interlace fixes
Currently, nouveau doesn't actually bother to try probing whether or not
it can actually handle interlaced modes over DisplayPort. As a result,
on volta and later we'll end up trying to set an interlaced mode even
when it's not supported and cause the front end for the display engine
to hang.
So, let's teach nouveau to reject interlaced modes on hardware that
can't actually