search for: nv50_cur

Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "nv50_cur".

Did you mean: nv50_curs
2015 Jan 05
2
drm/nouveau: dont switch vt on suspend
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at ubuntu.com> --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c index 3ed12a8cfc91..a4a586807903 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c @@ -370,6 +370,7 @@ nouveau_fbcon_create(struct drm_fb_helper *helper, ret = -ENOMEM; goto
2017 Jun 20
0
[PATCH 08/11] drm: nouveau: remove dead code and pointless local lut storage
...u32 i; - - for (i = 0; i < size; i++) { - nv_crtc->lut.r[i] = r[i]; - nv_crtc->lut.g[i] = g[i]; - nv_crtc->lut.b[i] = b[i]; - } - nv50_head_lut_load(crtc); return 0; } @@ -2329,19 +2320,13 @@ nv50_head_create(struct drm_device *dev, int index) struct nv50_base *base; struct nv50_curs *curs; struct drm_crtc *crtc; - int ret, i; + int ret; head = kzalloc(sizeof(*head), GFP_KERNEL); if (!head) return -ENOMEM; head->base.index = index; - for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) { - head->base.lut.r[i] = i << 8; - head->base.lut.g[i] = i << 8; - head->...
2017 Jul 06
0
[PATCH v4 11/14] drm: nouveau: remove dead code and pointless local lut storage
...u32 i; - - for (i = 0; i < size; i++) { - nv_crtc->lut.r[i] = r[i]; - nv_crtc->lut.g[i] = g[i]; - nv_crtc->lut.b[i] = b[i]; - } - nv50_head_lut_load(crtc); return 0; } @@ -2340,19 +2332,13 @@ nv50_head_create(struct drm_device *dev, int index) struct nv50_base *base; struct nv50_curs *curs; struct drm_crtc *crtc; - int ret, i; + int ret; head = kzalloc(sizeof(*head), GFP_KERNEL); if (!head) return -ENOMEM; head->base.index = index; - for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) { - head->base.lut.r[i] = i << 8; - head->base.lut.g[i] = i << 8; - head->...
2017 Jul 04
0
[PATCH v3 13/16] drm: nouveau: remove dead code and pointless local lut storage
...u32 i; - - for (i = 0; i < size; i++) { - nv_crtc->lut.r[i] = r[i]; - nv_crtc->lut.g[i] = g[i]; - nv_crtc->lut.b[i] = b[i]; - } - nv50_head_lut_load(crtc); return 0; } @@ -2340,19 +2332,13 @@ nv50_head_create(struct drm_device *dev, int index) struct nv50_base *base; struct nv50_curs *curs; struct drm_crtc *crtc; - int ret, i; + int ret; head = kzalloc(sizeof(*head), GFP_KERNEL); if (!head) return -ENOMEM; head->base.index = index; - for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) { - head->base.lut.r[i] = i << 8; - head->base.lut.g[i] = i << 8; - head->...
2017 Jul 13
0
[PATCH v5 11/14] drm: nouveau: remove dead code and pointless local lut storage
...u32 i; - - for (i = 0; i < size; i++) { - nv_crtc->lut.r[i] = r[i]; - nv_crtc->lut.g[i] = g[i]; - nv_crtc->lut.b[i] = b[i]; - } - nv50_head_lut_load(crtc); return 0; } @@ -2340,19 +2332,13 @@ nv50_head_create(struct drm_device *dev, int index) struct nv50_base *base; struct nv50_curs *curs; struct drm_crtc *crtc; - int ret, i; + int ret; head = kzalloc(sizeof(*head), GFP_KERNEL); if (!head) return -ENOMEM; head->base.index = index; - for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) { - head->base.lut.r[i] = i << 8; - head->base.lut.g[i] = i << 8; - head->...
2017 Jul 06
1
[PATCH v4 00/14] improve the fb_setcmap helper
Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but patches 1 and 3 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver do what I need. The rest is
2017 Jul 13
1
[PATCH v5 00/14] improve the fb_setcmap helper
Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but patches 1 and 3 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver do what I need. The rest is
2017 Jul 04
5
[PATCH v3 00/16] improve the fb_setcmap helper
Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but patches 1 through 5 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver do what I need. The rest
2017 Jul 04
5
[PATCH v3 00/16] improve the fb_setcmap helper
Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but patches 1 through 5 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver do what I need. The rest
2017 Jul 04
5
[PATCH v3 00/16] improve the fb_setcmap helper
Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but patches 1 through 5 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver do what I need. The rest
2017 Jun 20
15
[PATCH 00/11] improve the fb_setcmap helper
Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. Boris and Daniel, was this approximately what you had in mind? I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but the first patch is
2017 Jun 22
22
[PATCH v2 00/14] improve the fb_setcmap helper
Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but patches 1 and 3 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver do what I need (when patched