Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "nv50_curs".
Did you mean:
nv50_crc
2015 Jan 05
2
drm/nouveau: dont switch vt on suspend
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at ubuntu.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
index 3ed12a8cfc91..a4a586807903 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
@@ -370,6 +370,7 @@ nouveau_fbcon_create(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto
2017 Jun 20
0
[PATCH 08/11] drm: nouveau: remove dead code and pointless local lut storage
...u32 i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
- nv_crtc->lut.r[i] = r[i];
- nv_crtc->lut.g[i] = g[i];
- nv_crtc->lut.b[i] = b[i];
- }
-
nv50_head_lut_load(crtc);
return 0;
}
@@ -2329,19 +2320,13 @@ nv50_head_create(struct drm_device *dev, int index)
struct nv50_base *base;
struct nv50_curs *curs;
struct drm_crtc *crtc;
- int ret, i;
+ int ret;
head = kzalloc(sizeof(*head), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!head)
return -ENOMEM;
head->base.index = index;
- for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
- head->base.lut.r[i] = i << 8;
- head->base.lut.g[i] = i << 8;
- head->b...
2017 Jul 06
0
[PATCH v4 11/14] drm: nouveau: remove dead code and pointless local lut storage
...u32 i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
- nv_crtc->lut.r[i] = r[i];
- nv_crtc->lut.g[i] = g[i];
- nv_crtc->lut.b[i] = b[i];
- }
-
nv50_head_lut_load(crtc);
return 0;
}
@@ -2340,19 +2332,13 @@ nv50_head_create(struct drm_device *dev, int index)
struct nv50_base *base;
struct nv50_curs *curs;
struct drm_crtc *crtc;
- int ret, i;
+ int ret;
head = kzalloc(sizeof(*head), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!head)
return -ENOMEM;
head->base.index = index;
- for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
- head->base.lut.r[i] = i << 8;
- head->base.lut.g[i] = i << 8;
- head->b...
2017 Jul 04
0
[PATCH v3 13/16] drm: nouveau: remove dead code and pointless local lut storage
...u32 i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
- nv_crtc->lut.r[i] = r[i];
- nv_crtc->lut.g[i] = g[i];
- nv_crtc->lut.b[i] = b[i];
- }
-
nv50_head_lut_load(crtc);
return 0;
}
@@ -2340,19 +2332,13 @@ nv50_head_create(struct drm_device *dev, int index)
struct nv50_base *base;
struct nv50_curs *curs;
struct drm_crtc *crtc;
- int ret, i;
+ int ret;
head = kzalloc(sizeof(*head), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!head)
return -ENOMEM;
head->base.index = index;
- for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
- head->base.lut.r[i] = i << 8;
- head->base.lut.g[i] = i << 8;
- head->b...
2017 Jul 13
0
[PATCH v5 11/14] drm: nouveau: remove dead code and pointless local lut storage
...u32 i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
- nv_crtc->lut.r[i] = r[i];
- nv_crtc->lut.g[i] = g[i];
- nv_crtc->lut.b[i] = b[i];
- }
-
nv50_head_lut_load(crtc);
return 0;
}
@@ -2340,19 +2332,13 @@ nv50_head_create(struct drm_device *dev, int index)
struct nv50_base *base;
struct nv50_curs *curs;
struct drm_crtc *crtc;
- int ret, i;
+ int ret;
head = kzalloc(sizeof(*head), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!head)
return -ENOMEM;
head->base.index = index;
- for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
- head->base.lut.r[i] = i << 8;
- head->base.lut.g[i] = i << 8;
- head->b...
2017 Jul 06
1
[PATCH v4 00/14] improve the fb_setcmap helper
Hi!
While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and
specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some
push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved
by the core. This is my attempt to do it right.
I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile,
but patches 1 and 3 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver
do what I need. The rest is
2017 Jul 13
1
[PATCH v5 00/14] improve the fb_setcmap helper
Hi!
While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and
specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some
push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved
by the core. This is my attempt to do it right.
I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile,
but patches 1 and 3 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver
do what I need. The rest is
2017 Jul 04
5
[PATCH v3 00/16] improve the fb_setcmap helper
Hi!
While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and
specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some
push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved
by the core. This is my attempt to do it right.
I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile,
but patches 1 through 5 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver
do what I need. The rest
2017 Jul 04
5
[PATCH v3 00/16] improve the fb_setcmap helper
Hi!
While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and
specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some
push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved
by the core. This is my attempt to do it right.
I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile,
but patches 1 through 5 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver
do what I need. The rest
2017 Jul 04
5
[PATCH v3 00/16] improve the fb_setcmap helper
Hi!
While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and
specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some
push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved
by the core. This is my attempt to do it right.
I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile,
but patches 1 through 5 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver
do what I need. The rest
2017 Jun 20
15
[PATCH 00/11] improve the fb_setcmap helper
Hi!
While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and
specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some
push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved
by the core. This is my attempt to do it right.
Boris and Daniel, was this approximately what you had in mind?
I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile,
but the first patch is
2017 Jun 22
22
[PATCH v2 00/14] improve the fb_setcmap helper
Hi!
While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and
specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some
push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved
by the core. This is my attempt to do it right.
I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile,
but patches 1 and 3 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver
do what I need (when patched