search for: nusiance

Hello, I've been running some HLMs using the lme function quite happily; it does what I want and I'm pretty sure I understand it. The issue is that I'm currently trying to estimate a model with a 14-level "nusiance" factor as an independent variable...which makes the output quite ugly. All I'm really interested in is the question of whether these factor as a whole (and its interactions with other factors) are significant. The summary.aov function provides this sort of aggregation for lm objects, b...

I sent a bug report to Mozilla about this, but I was hoping someone here might have an insight on this. I use SeaMonkey as my default browser (32-bit even though I'm running x86_64 CentOS 5.1), version 1.1.7. Shortyl after installing 1.1.7 on my 5.0 (and even since 5.1), I noticed that every so often, seemingly at random, although it appears most frequently when I click on something that

Hi there, I run two regressions: y = a1 + b1 * x + e1 y = a2 + b2 * z + e2 I want to test against the null hypothesis: b1 = b2. How do I design the test? I think I can add two equations together and divide both sides by 2: y = 0.5*(a1+a2) + 0.5*b1 * x + 0.5*b2 * z + e3, where e3 = 0.5*(e1 + e2). or just y = a3 + 0.5*b1 * x + 0.5*b2 * z + e3 If I run this new regression, I can test against

so, should this go into 3.5? Index: serverloop.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/markus/cvs/ssh/serverloop.c,v retrieving revision 1.103 diff -u -r1.103 serverloop.c --- serverloop.c 24 Jun 2002 14:33:27 -0000 1.103 +++ serverloop.c 12 Jul 2002 16:34:20 -0000 @@ -388,6 +388,11 @@ buffer_append(&stderr_buffer, buf, len); } } + /*

Mike Lander wrote: > I am building a shorewall box that the last post has the SSH error and > wanted > some feedback from the list if possible. At first I thought the two ISP''s > I > building this > for had two T-1''s with FQ ip''s as it. I have the box built for this ready > to > go. > Now I find out that one of the T-1''s is