search for: nuisance

*Dear experts,* Please excuse me for disturbing... Right now I am struggling with GLM a bit... Would you be so kind to provide me a solution on using nuisance variables. The problem is that I have data on Depression (volumetric measurements of different brain regions) and I want to include age, gender and education as nuisance parameters in the model. In the other words I would like to model the model depression scores in respect to volumes, considering...

Hi, I am new to R, so I am unsure of the formula to set up this analysis. I would like to run a linear model with a continuous dependent variable (brain volume) and a continuous independent variable (age) while controlling for a categorical nuisance variable (gender). Age and brain volume are correlated. There are no gender differences in age but there are significant gender differences in brain volume. Therefore, I would like to control for gender when assessing the association between brain volume and age. Any help would be very much appre...

...ing with rw1071, just after starting Rgui the scope is not with Rconsole, but some other place. This means I have to do a mouse click in the Rconsole before starting to write the first command. Since I always forget this, I end up writing the first command twice. This is of course only a minor nuisance, but why is focus no longer set to Rconsole window when start-up? This is on windows XP. (pre-compiled binary from CRAN) Kjetil Halvorsen

Hello group, Can someone please put me through how to estimate the nuisance parameters (Saturation parameter and radius) for the Geyer saturation process? It seems quite confusing to me how these parameters are achieved, but they are very important in determining the interaction between points in a point process. I am using Spatstat package. Thanks. neba [[alternative...

...upid question... I have dataset of different brain structures within two groups of subjects. But unfortunately these groups are not matched by age and gender. Would you be so kind to suggest me how (using which formula) can I compare two groups by factor ³diagnosis² considering ³age² and ³gender as nuisance variables? --- Best Regards, Alex [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1428 Summary: Banner output can be a nuisance with non-interactive use Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbuc...

I have the following dataset: 96 plots 12 varieties 2 time points The experiment is arranged as follows: A single plot has two varieties tested on it. With respect to time points, plots come in 3 kinds: (1) varietyA, timepoint#1 vs. variety B, timepoint#1 (2) varietyA timepoint #2 vs. varietyB timepoint #2 (3) varietyA timepoint #1 vs. variety A timepoint#2 - there are 36 of each kind

HI sorry to be a nuisance to all!!! how can i see the code of a particular function? e.g. nnet just as an example

...mple ANOVA is the same in SPSS and R. Including covariates improves the main effect (p-value) in R and diminishes it in SPSS.. The formula I have been using is: >Y = cbind(dV1, dV2, dV3) >aov(lm(Y~iV1+cV1+cV2)) The main?independent?variable is disease group and the covariates are continuous nuisance variables such as age. Both nuisance variables interact with the dependent variable but not each other. The frequency distribution of the covariates is similar for each group, but the groups are not matched 1 to 1. Therefore we would like to control for these factors statistically. Is this the prop...

...alue being stored actually is a constant known at compile-time > you should be able to use cast<ConstantInt *>(vo)->getZExtValue() to > retrieve a uint64_t value (careful of i128s!). > > If that cast fails then you're not dealing with a constant store. This > is either a nuisance (if you were expecting the possibility and can > deal with it) or a huge misunderstanding over compile-time vs runtime > values. > I think it's a misunderstanding in may part. Let me explain my intention first. I want to retrieve the value (if isPointerTy() returns true) to be stored...

...importFrom, i.e., there are no importMethodsFrom or importClassesFrom functions). 2. If I don't need to worry, is there a way to turn the message off? I as a developer need to see it, but users don't and it may worry them unnecessarily. Updating all 17 of my test/*.Rout.save files is a nuisance as well, but only a nuisance. I'd like to upload this to CRAN soon as I have users asking for the updated lmekin function (which uses Matrix). In the long term all the bdsmatrix functions will be replaced by Matrix, but that requires major changes to C code so "long" is the operativ...

...nt system is a very nice middle ground. We get nice sequential revision numbers from svn, and behind the scenes everyone can go crazy with git. It's a little awkward to set up a new repo that pulls from the git mirrors and also lets you use git-svn dcommit to push back, but that's a minor nuisance AFAICT.

Hi, this is not a genuine Dovecot bug, more a nuisance. It applies to OpenSuse 13.2 but maybe also to other Linux's. The standard installation of Dovecot (especially 10-ssl.conf) places the certificate dovecot.pem in /etc/ssl/certs. Sometimes during updates does OpenSuse renew all certificates in /etc/ssl/certs and erases dovecot.pem. This block...

On 11 June 2017 at 11:32, Nikodemus Siivola <nikodemus at random-state.net> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 7:49 PM, Dipanjan Das via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On 11 June 2017 at 07:53, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Sounds like you're looking for reinterpret_cast: http://en.cp

...known at compile-time >>> you should be able to use cast<ConstantInt *>(vo)->getZExtValue() to >>> retrieve a uint64_t value (careful of i128s!). >>> >>> If that cast fails then you're not dealing with a constant store. This >>> is either a nuisance (if you were expecting the possibility and can >>> deal with it) or a huge misunderstanding over compile-time vs runtime >>> values. >>> >> >> I think it's a misunderstanding in may part. Let me explain my intention >> first. I want to retrieve the v...

...> can tell this just sacrifices user convenience for developer > convenience, which IMHO is usually a bad trade. > > I'd vote to merge the modules into one, but otherwise either keep the > status quo until subversion gets upgraded, or maybe add a checkout > script. It's a nuisance to check out three things (iceutil, m4, and > your project) to work on one, but it's not that much of a nuisance, > and checkout isn't a frequent operation. Grouping the modules together is not a problem, however I agree with Brendan here that they should still be linked into icecast...

...; (january) does so with the names of the month. Well, this function is broken in OO shipped with CentOS. And I don't have the slightest clue as to why. Tried the same on a more recent version of OO in Ubuntu, and it works like a charm. Anyone has a solution to this? This seems like a major nuisance to me. Cheers, Niki

Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote: > For 2.6 to really be a useful, we need this bug fixed: > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=4963 > > Would it be possible to get this merged into 2.6? While we're at it, what about: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3239 This is a real nuisance, as people regularly build LLVM in a way (--enable-pic, which even is the default now) which makes the JIT create wrong code on x86-32. I've seen this on Ubuntu and Fedora Core 10 (thankfully Michel Salim has fixed the FC LLVM packages now). Albert -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Dept. of Music-Inf...

...t;>> >>> As a developer, it would be mildly nice to give stores names. >>> However, that may be more than offset by the fact that store instructions >>> would be able to have users. It'd always be safe to RAUW a store with >>> undef {}, but that's a nuisance. >> >> at this point I should confess that I was only thinking of function return >> types when talking about void type, and forgot that StoreInst returns a >> type, void type. How about having getType return null for StoreInst and >> similar? > > That sounds li...

For 2.6 to really be a useful, we need this bug fixed: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=4963 Would it be possible to get this merged into 2.6? -Tomas