Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "numuops".
Did you mean:
numops
2018 May 15
1
[MachineScheduler] Question about IssueWidth / NumMicroOps
...you want to make those Begin/EndGroup post-RA specific, it's
> fine with me. Or you could be more ambitious and introduce the concept
> of a post-RA specific processor resource.
>
This patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46870, put those checks under a
post-RA flag, and also covers the NumUOps / IssueWidth the same way.
/Jonas
> -Andy
>
>>
>>> Sorry, I don't have time to draw diagrams and tables. Hopefully you
>>> can makes sense of my long-form rambling.
>> Yes, very helpful to me :-)
>>
>> Thanks again,
>>
>> Jonas
>...
2018 May 14
0
[MachineScheduler] Question about IssueWidth / NumMicroOps
> On May 14, 2018, at 11:10 AM, Jonas Paulsson <paulsson at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thank you very much for the most helpful explanations! Many things could go in as comments, if you ask me - for example:
>
> ---
>> The LLVM machine model is an abstract machine.
>
>> The abstract pipeline is built around the notion of an
2018 May 14
2
[MachineScheduler] Question about IssueWidth / NumMicroOps
Hi Andrew,
Thank you very much for the most helpful explanations! Many things could
go in as comments, if you ask me - for example:
---
> The LLVM machine model is an abstract machine.
> The abstract pipeline is built around the notion of an "issue point". This is merely a reference point for counting machine cycles.
>
>
> IssueWidth is meant to be a hard in-order