Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "numoperations".
Did you mean:
numiterations
2007 Dec 25
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-ar's q operation
...k are obvious", I did. The patch
follows, just in case.
Index: tools/llvm-ar/llvm-ar.cpp
===================================================================
--- tools/llvm-ar/llvm-ar.cpp (revision 45352)
+++ tools/llvm-ar/llvm-ar.cpp (working copy)
@@ -188,6 +188,7 @@
case 'd': ++NumOperations; Operation = Delete; break;
case 'm': ++NumOperations; Operation = Move ; break;
case 'p': ++NumOperations; Operation = Print; break;
+ case 'q': ++NumOperations; Operation = QuickAppend; break;
case 'r': ++NumOperations; Operation = ReplaceOrInsert...
2007 Jul 05
2
[LLVMdev] PATCH (rest of code changes) "bytecode" --> "bitcode"
Here is the bulk of the sanitizing.
My residual doubts center around the question
whether we still do/want to support (un)compressed *byte*code
in 2.0/2.1.
I need a definitive word on this to proceed.
My understanding is that bytecode is already gone, but there are
still some functions/enums that really deal with *byte*code
(instead of *bit*code).
I did not touch those areas, so the attached