search for: num_res

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 29 matches for "num_res".

Did you mean: num_reg
2017 Nov 17
0
[RFC PATCH v2 4/5] ACPI/IORT: Support paravirtualized IOMMU
...*node) +{ + struct acpi_iort_pviommu *pviommu; + + pviommu = (struct acpi_iort_pviommu *)node->node_data; + + /* Mem + IRQs */ + return 1 + pviommu->interrupt_count; +} + +static void __init paravirt_init_resources(struct resource *res, + struct acpi_iort_node *node) +{ + int i; + int num_res = 0; + int hw_irq, trigger; + struct acpi_iort_pviommu *pviommu; + + pviommu = (struct acpi_iort_pviommu *)node->node_data; + + res[num_res].start = pviommu->base_address; + res[num_res].end = pviommu->base_address + pviommu->span - 1; + res[num_res].flags = IORESOURCE_MEM; + num_res++;...
2005 Mar 24
1
RE: [R] Mapping actual to expected columns for princomp object
[Re-directing to R-devel, as I think this needs changes to the code.] Can I suggest a modification to stats:predict.princomp so that it will check for column (variable) names? In src/library/stats/R/princomp-add.R, insert the following after line 4: if (!is.null(cn <- names(object$center))) newdata <- newdata[, cn] Now Dana's example looks like: > predict(pca1, frz) Error in
2014 Jun 02
1
[RFC PATCH v1.3 08/16 1/2] drm/radeon: add timeout argument to radeon_fence_wait_seq
Am 02.06.2014 15:14, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > This makes it possible to wait for a specific amount of time, > rather than wait until infinity. > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> > --- > Splitted out version, I've noticed that I forgot to convert > radeon_fence_wait_empty to long r, fixed. >
2005 Mar 24
0
Mapping actual to expected columns for princomp object
I am working with data sets in which the number and order of columns may vary, but each column is uniquely identified by its name. E.g., one data set might have columns MW logP Num_Rings Num_H_Donors while another has columns Num_Rings Num_Atoms Num_H_Donors logP MW I would like to be able to perform a principal component analysis (PCA) on one data set and save the PCA object to
2014 Jun 02
3
[RFC PATCH v1.2 08/16] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
Am 02.06.2014 12:09, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > Changes since v1: > - Fixed interaction with reset handling. > + Use exclusive_lock, either with trylock or blocking. > + Bump sw irq refcount in the recovery function to prevent fiddling > with irq registers during gpu recovery. > - Add radeon lockup detection to the default fence wait function. First of all please
2014 Jun 02
0
[RFC PATCH v1.3 08/16 1/2] drm/radeon: add timeout argument to radeon_fence_wait_seq
This makes it possible to wait for a specific amount of time, rather than wait until infinity. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- Splitted out version, I've noticed that I forgot to convert radeon_fence_wait_empty to long r, fixed. drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+),
2014 May 15
2
[RFC PATCH v1 08/16] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
Am 15.05.2014 11:38, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > op 15-05-14 11:21, Christian K?nig schreef: >> Am 15.05.2014 03:06, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>> op 14-05-14 17:29, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>>> + /* did fence get signaled after we enabled the sw irq? */ >>>>> + if >>>>>
2019 Dec 23
7
[PATCH 1/6] iommu/omap: convert to devm_platform_ioremap_resource
Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() to simplify code. Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz at gmail.com> --- drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c index be551cc34be4..297c1be7ecb0 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c @@ -1175,7 +1175,6
2019 Dec 23
7
[PATCH 1/6] iommu/omap: convert to devm_platform_ioremap_resource
Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() to simplify code. Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz at gmail.com> --- drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c index be551cc34be4..297c1be7ecb0 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c @@ -1175,7 +1175,6
2014 May 15
0
[RFC PATCH v1 08/16] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
op 15-05-14 11:42, Christian K?nig schreef: > Am 15.05.2014 11:38, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >> op 15-05-14 11:21, Christian K?nig schreef: >>> Am 15.05.2014 03:06, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>>> op 14-05-14 17:29, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>>>> + /* did fence get signaled after we enabled the sw irq? */ >>>>>> + if
2014 May 19
2
[RFC PATCH v1 08/16] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
Am 19.05.2014 15:35, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > op 19-05-14 14:30, Christian K?nig schreef: >> Am 19.05.2014 12:10, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>> op 19-05-14 10:27, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>> Am 19.05.2014 10:00, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>>> [SNIP] >>>> The problem here is that the whole approach collides with the way >>>>
2014 Jun 02
0
[RFC PATCH v1.2 08/16] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
Changes since v1: - Fixed interaction with reset handling. + Use exclusive_lock, either with trylock or blocking. + Bump sw irq refcount in the recovery function to prevent fiddling with irq registers during gpu recovery. - Add radeon lockup detection to the default fence wait function. --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h index
2005 Apr 19
0
Changes to batchSOM from 1.9.1 to 2.0.1
Has the algorithm used by batchSOM for hexagonal topology changed in some way between R 1.9.1 and 2.0.1? In comparing between the two versions, I get identical results for rectangular topology, but very different results for hexagonal topology. (I tried to find release notes for the VR bundle that might explain the changes, but was unable to locate these anywhere.) Here's the script I
2014 May 19
2
[RFC PATCH v1 08/16] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
Am 19.05.2014 10:00, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > op 15-05-14 18:13, Christian K?nig schreef: >> Am 15.05.2014 17:58, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>> op 15-05-14 17:48, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>> Am 15.05.2014 16:18, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>>>> op 15-05-14 15:19, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>>>> Am 15.05.2014 15:04, schrieb
2007 Nov 28
2
Can't update ActiveSupport gem
I''m getting the message ERROR: While executing gem ... (ArgumentError) string contains null byte My RAILS implementation is now completely out of sync. All other gems are updated to latest except ActiveSupport. rake rails:update:configs is aborting because ActiveSupport is wrong version. Any help would be appreciated! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You
2014 May 19
0
[RFC PATCH v1 08/16] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
op 19-05-14 10:27, Christian K?nig schreef: > Am 19.05.2014 10:00, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >> op 15-05-14 18:13, Christian K?nig schreef: >>> Am 15.05.2014 17:58, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>>> op 15-05-14 17:48, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>>> Am 15.05.2014 16:18, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>>>>> op 15-05-14 15:19, Christian K?nig
2014 May 19
2
[RFC PATCH v1 08/16] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
Am 19.05.2014 12:10, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > op 19-05-14 10:27, Christian K?nig schreef: >> Am 19.05.2014 10:00, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >> [SNIP] >> The problem here is that the whole approach collides with the way we >> do reset handling from a conceptual point of view. Every IOCTL or >> other call chain into the driver is protected by the read side of
2014 May 15
2
[RFC PATCH v1 08/16] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
Am 15.05.2014 15:04, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > op 15-05-14 11:42, Christian K?nig schreef: >> Am 15.05.2014 11:38, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>> op 15-05-14 11:21, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>> Am 15.05.2014 03:06, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>>>> op 14-05-14 17:29, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>>>>> + /* did fence get signaled
2023 Mar 22
0
[PATCH v2 1/2] drm/virtio: Refactor job submission code path
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 9:11?AM Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko at collabora.com> wrote: > > Move virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl() into separate virtgpu_submit.c file > and refactor the code along the way to ease addition of new features to > the ioctl. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko at collabora.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/Makefile
2014 Jul 09
2
[PATCH 09/17] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
> -----Original Message----- > From: Maarten Lankhorst [mailto:maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 8:30 AM > To: airlied at linux.ie > Cc: thellstrom at vmware.com; nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org; linux- > kernel at vger.kernel.org; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; > bskeggs at redhat.com; Deucher, Alexander; Koenig, Christian >