search for: ntum

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "ntum".

Did you mean: ntlm
2004 Oct 20
0
up and down shaping based on IP
...as" > > for IP in $CLIENTS; do > tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:1${IP} htb rate 80kbit > ceil 1000k bit cburst 1kbit > done > > #dla nie zakwalifikowanych > tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:100 htb rate 50kbit ceil > 50kbit qua ntum 4 > > echo "Ustawianie filtrów i SFQ" > > for IP in $CLIENTS; do > tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 1: prio 2 u32 match ip > dst 192.168 .0.1${IP} flowid 1:1${IP} > tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:1${IP} handle 1${IP}:0 sfq perturb 10 > d...
2004 Oct 21
3
[Fwd: up and down shaping based on IP]
...as" > > for IP in $CLIENTS; do > tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:1${IP} htb rate 80kbit > ceil 1000k bit cburst 1kbit > done > > #dla nie zakwalifikowanych > tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:100 htb rate 50kbit ceil > 50kbit qua ntum 4 > > echo "Ustawianie filtrów i SFQ" > > for IP in $CLIENTS; do > tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 1: prio 2 u32 match ip > dst 192.168 .0.1${IP} flowid 1:1${IP} > tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:1${IP} handle 1${IP}:0 sfq perturb 10 > d...
2020 Jun 24
0
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
I could do so, but it wouldn't be until this weekend. Also, Tom mixed in some version bumps to the rebuild, so we'd have to check whether those would actually be okay in a released version. I would also appreciate some review on new (mostly test) dependencies for these bumps. On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 09:43, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Maybe Elliott? >
2020 Jul 09
1
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 09:58, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 7 July 2020 11.44.48 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Try with the CLI (see "man bodhi"): > > > > $ bodhi updates edit <update> --addbuilds <builds> > > I found that the best call in this case is instead of --addbuilds to use > --from-tag since then
2020 Aug 11
0
R2spec woes
Hi Jos?, On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 11:20, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > I tried R2spec to create the spec files necessary to have Rcpparmadillo. > > I noticed that it has some issues, one example is that it placed some files > irrespectively if they were present in the tar or not. > I would like to update this, but I'd also like to grab Jason's
2020 Aug 11
2
R2spec woes
On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 at 02:35, Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Jos?, > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 11:20, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > > > I tried R2spec to create the spec files necessary to have Rcpparmadillo. > > > > I noticed that it has some issues, one exa...
2020 Jul 27
2
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 11:05, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Friday, 3 July 2020 18.36.17 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Nice! What if we create a group "R" on Pagure and a repo > > "fedora-scripts" or something like that? > > I would like to improve the scripts but FWIW here it comes a rough version of > the script I used.
2020 Jul 03
1
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 13:03, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Monday, 29 June 2020 13.46.02 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > But the mass rebuild process is very different, because releng doesn't > > follow any particular order (they don't need to, because nothing > > really changed). > > > > The question is whether there is any tool
2020 Jun 25
2
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 19:01, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 10.42.10 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Thanks, Jos? and Elliott. I can help with reviews. > > > > I attach here a list of batches of CRAN packages to be rebuilt in > > order (batches separated by a blank line), and the script that > > generates it. Hope
2020 Jun 26
2
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
Hi Jos?, On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 20:05, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Friday, 26 June 2020 00.45.46 WEST Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > Thanks for starting off builds. However, please be careful merging to > > master, as some packages were bumped and have incompatibilities that > > should not be put in stable releases. I will try to come
2019 Jul 04
2
Fwd: Fedora 31 System-Wide change proposal: Automatic R runtime dependencies
...n these standard names will be added from library metadata. Standard provides will use the unmodified versions from the metadata. Suggested dependencies will not be automatically added, but can be opted in by the packager. == Owner == * Name: [[User:qulogic| Elliott Sales de Andrade]] * Email: quantum.analyst at gmail.com == Detailed Description == R libraries currently provide metadata indicating runtime requirements on other libraries in a <code>DESCRIPTION</code> file. Using RPM's file attributes and dependency generator support, these requirements can be added to packages a...