search for: ntfs4

...to extended > attributes directly from userspace. That's how most of > the NFSv4 ACLs usually get done :-(. > > Of course all implementations use different blobs containing > different things to do the same thing :-). > make sure that you dont run in a open files limit with ntfs4 acl on netapp ( i think this was in the orig question ) , there may be a max of 32000 per head ( if exist ) or 64000 in summa Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Franziskanerstra?e 15, 81669 M?nchen Sitz der Gesellschaft: M?nchen, Amtsgericht...

...at's how most of >>> the NFSv4 ACLs usually get done :-(. >>> >>> Of course all implementations use different blobs containing >>> different things to do the same thing :-). >>> >> >> make sure that you dont run in a open files limit with ntfs4 acl on >> netapp ( i think this was in the orig question ) , there may be a max of >> 32000 per head ( if exist ) or 64000 in summa > > Are we talking about nfsv4 or ntfs(4)? And what limit is > that? It can't make sense to limit the number of acls on a > system. sorry...

...y from userspace. That's how most of > > the NFSv4 ACLs usually get done :-(. > > > > Of course all implementations use different blobs containing > > different things to do the same thing :-). > > > > make sure that you dont run in a open files limit with ntfs4 acl on > netapp ( i think this was in the orig question ) , there may be a max of > 32000 per head ( if exist ) or 64000 in summa Are we talking about nfsv4 or ntfs(4)? And what limit is that? It can't make sense to limit the number of acls on a system. Volker -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofs...

> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:59:47 +0100 > From: Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE > To: groucho.64738 at hotmail.com > CC: samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] NFS4 ACLs with samba 3 (or 4) > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 01:17:34PM -0400, Kevin Taylor wrote: > > I know this was discussed a lot a few years ago, but my google searches aren't quite getting me where

Hi, all. This is my first post to the list, so please forgive me if this is an old issue. I scoured the mailing list archives by hand and could find no mention of it, and the official FAQ-o-matic mentions it, but doesn't offer a fix that works for me. I've set up an rsync daemon on Windows NT4 by installing the latest cygwin. Using the cygwin1.dll and rsync.exe, I'm able to connect

...W2k to delete and nothing works. It does, however, mount my homedirectory from the samba server and that works just fine. I got so frustrated that i found an old NT4 box and tried it. It worked perfectly!!! Is there some sort of crazy new "security descriptor structure" in NTFS5 that NTFS4 doesn't have? Does anyone know what's going on here? I've hit google harder than I ever have in my life and I'm still stumped. Thanks, Josh Return-Path: <mrzasa@fciconnect.com> Delivered-To: samba@samba.org Received: from exmn.tric.am.fciconnect.com (unknown [206.57.126.5...