search for: nt_status_sharing_viol

...ipt, which uses the SmbClientParser module. The Perl script grabs files from clients running Windows 2000. The files on the client computers are created by in-house MFC applications on those computers. Occasionally, when the Perl script tries to delete files from the client computers, it gets an NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION and is unable to delete the file. I sometimes even get this error long after the software on the client that created the file has exited. However, sometimes everything works just fine and the Perl script is able to delete the files without problems. Does anybody know what causes this, or at...

...not find any locks on this file by issuing smbstatus on both linux servers.we cannot find any trace of this file with lsof on both linux serversthe files are always size ZEROthe problem is present using different samba users smb: \Echange\CoquillesAAF\> get "Jeux Olympiques 2012.aaf" NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION opening remote file \Echange\CoquillesAAF\Jeux Olympiques 2012.aaf smb: \Echange\CoquillesAAF\> This is not reproductible on demand... but we are getting regularly non-erasable files If I'm connected to samba through windows explorer, the message is different, but it is probably chang...

...equest_error_ex: smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[1] status[NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED] || at ../../source3/smbd/smb2_tcon.c:142 [2020/05/11 08:19:00.072196,? 3] ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3272(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex) ? smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[1] status[NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION] || at ../../source3/smbd/smb2_create.c:334 [2020/05/11 08:33:47.156000,? 3] ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3272(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex) ? smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[1] status[NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND] || at ../../source3/smbd/smb2_create.c:33...

Ok increased logging and got the error here is what got logged: 2020/04/23 14:03:17.514132, 3] ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3274(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex) smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[1] status[NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION] || at ../../source3/smbd/smb2_create.c:334 [2020/04/23 14:03:17.514206, 3] ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3274(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex) smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[5] status[NT_STATUS_FILE_CLOSED] || at ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:2635 [2020/04/23...

...entOS 7) I do not have this issue. > Ok increased logging and got the error here is what got logged: > > 2020/04/23 14:03:17.514132, 3] > ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3274(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex) > smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[1] > status[NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION] || at ../../source3/smbd/smb2_create.c:334 > [2020/04/23 14:03:17.514206, 3] > ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3274(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex) > smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[5] > status[NT_STATUS_FILE_CLOSED] || at ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server...

...issue. > >> Ok increased logging and got the error here is what got logged: >> >> 2020/04/23 14:03:17.514132, 3] >> ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3274(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex) >> smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[1] >> status[NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION] || at ../../source3/smbd/smb2_create.c:334 >> [2020/04/23 14:03:17.514206, 3] >> ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3274(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex) >> smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[5] >> status[NT_STATUS_FILE_CLOSED] || at ../../source3/...

Hi all Got a couple of errors in the logs wondering what they mean??? Google does not come up with too much on these NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_FILE, NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION, NT_STATUS_INVALID_LEVEL and NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND. Four clips illustrating the above are below... I have am wondering how I sort this out. I am particularly worried about the NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_FILE. All the best Justin. EXAMPLE 1 New file A13C0000 [2003/02/24 09:30:05, 8]...

...tOS 7) I do not have this issue. > Ok increased logging and got the error here is what got logged: > > 2020/04/23 14:03:17.514132, 3] > ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3274(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex) > smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[1] > status[NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION] || at ../../source3/smbd/smb2_create.c:334 > [2020/04/23 14:03:17.514206, 3] > ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3274(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex) > smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[5] > status[NT_STATUS_FILE_CLOSED] || at ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server...

...issue. > >> Ok increased logging and got the error here is what got logged: >> >> 2020/04/23 14:03:17.514132, 3] >> ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3274(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex) >> smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[1] >> status[NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION] || at ../../source3/smbd/smb2_create.c:334 >> [2020/04/23 14:03:17.514206, 3] >> ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3274(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex) >> smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[5] >> status[NT_STATUS_FILE_CLOSED] || at ../../source3/...

...fileid:mapping = fsname use mmap = no vfs objects = gpfs gpfs:sharemodes = yes I can access home dir as user with no single problem, but when it comes to locking file (for reading it, when client does 'get file', for example), here is what happens: smb: \> get opt.err NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION opening remote file \opt.err [2008/04/22 14:49:53, 4] smbd/open.c:open_file_ntcreate(1605) calling open_file with flags=0x0 flags2=0x0 mode=0744, access_mask = 0x120089, open_access_mask = 0x120089 [2008/04/22 14:49:53, 10] smbd/open.c:fd_open(67) fd_open: name opt.err, flags = 00 mod...

...he following: 1291 10089 DENY_WRITE 0x20089 RDONLY NONE /path/to/MyShare path/to/the/document.pdf Wed Jan 29 11:59:15 2014 If the user attempts to remove the file using smbclient instead of Windows Explorer, it also fails: smb: \path\to\the\> rm document.pdf NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION deleting remote file \path\to\the\document.pdf NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION listing \path\to\the\document.pdf Waiting a period of time (maybe around 30 minutes) releases the lock and the file allowed to be written to. Reading through the Samba documentation about locking (http://www.samba.org/...

...ackup as follows: smbclient \\\\christian.knebb.de\\C "xxxxx" -U backuppc -E -d 2 -c tarmode\ full -TcrX - "\Apps\*" "\hiberfil.sys" >/bu.tar Unfortunately smbclient always tries to backup the file- which is obviously always locked and thus smbclient aborts: [...] NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION opening remote file \hiberfil.sys (\) NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION listing \\* tar: dumped 84 files and directories Total bytes written: 12719104 My questions: 1. What is the correct syntax to exclude a single file? 2. Will someone possibly reopen the above bug and document the correct usage...

...osix.c:542(delete_windows_lock_ref_count) delete_windows_lock_ref_count for file New Text Document.txt [2012/05/11 11:29:41.980063, 5] smbd/files.c:464(file_free) freed files structure 9705 (2 used) [2012/05/11 11:29:41.980107, 10] smbd/open.c:3429(create_file_unixpath) create_file_unixpath: NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION [2012/05/11 11:29:41.980150, 10] smbd/open.c:3702(create_file_default) create_file: NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION [2012/05/11 11:29:41.980193, 3] smbd/error.c:81(error_packet_set) error packet at smbd/error.c(161) cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION My smb.conf looks like t...

...Ok increased logging and got the error here is what got logged: >>> >>> 2020/04/23 14:03:17.514132, 3] >>> ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3274(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex) >>> smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[1] >>> status[NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION] || at ../../source3/smbd/smb2_create.c:334 >>> [2020/04/23 14:03:17.514206, 3] >>> ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3274(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex) >>> smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[5] >>> status[NT_STATUS_FILE_CLOSED] || a...

...ared when logging out from the domain the last two times, and that i have this in my logs (loglevel 3): smbd/notify_inotify.c:watch_destructor(351) inotify_rm_watch returned Das Argument ist ung?ltig and smbd/error.c:error_packet_set(61) error packet at smbd/nttrans.c(532) cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION please help me... This isn't my first samba server...but i am really going nuts with this one. Any idea is very welcome... thank you very much Sascha my smb.conf (the main share being worked on being "projects"): [global] workgroup = domainname printing = cup...

...ed Nov 1 18:57:22 winix-test smbd[362]: [2017/11/01 18:57:22.458270, 0] ../source3/printing/nt_printing.c:1097(move_driver_file_to_download_area) Nov 1 18:57:22 winix-test smbd[362]: move_driver_file_to_download_area: Unable to rename [x64/eSf6psf_builtin.dll] to [x64/3/eSf6psf_builtin.dll]: NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION My smb.conf : [global] security = ADS workgroup = TEST realm = TEST.EUS log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log log level = 10 idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap config * : range = 3000-7999 idmap config TEST : backend = rid idm...

Hi, Does smbtorture have any issues operating in a Domain environment? I get the following error even for simple tests [root@D2950-11 samba_tests]# ./smbtorture //D1950-01/global-share -U TESTDOMAIN2+testuserc OPEN using seed 1233356434 Password: host=D1950-01 share=global-share user=TESTDOMAIN2+testuserc myname=D2950-11 Running OPEN starting open test failed to open share connection:

...Ok increased logging and got the error here is what got logged: >>> >>> 2020/04/23 14:03:17.514132, 3] >>> ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3274(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex) >>> smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[1] >>> status[NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION] || at ../../source3/smbd/smb2_create.c:334 >>> [2020/04/23 14:03:17.514206, 3] >>> ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3274(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex) >>> smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[5] >>> status[NT_STATUS_FILE_CLOSED] || a...

Hello, I'm running Samba 4.12.1 both as a domain controller on one box (DC1) and as a joined member on another box for a file server (FS1). I have three shares on FS1 and intermittently I am getting a message that says "\\fs1\shared is not accessible. You might not have permissions to use this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to find out if you have access

...o I'll be able to rebuild the rpms and install individually. Can you tell me if the client patch should be applied to 4.4.5 or 4.4.6 (or is valid for both)? > > smb: \> open test > open file \test: for read/write fnum 1 > > smb: \> open test > Failed to open file \test. NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION > > Without the patch the opens would succeed: > > smb: \> open test > open file \test: for read/write fnum 1 > smb: \> open test > open file \test: for read/write fnum 2 > > If you can reproduce the issue with smbclient, please set loglevel to > 10 on both...