search for: nsizes

Dear R-ers, somehow it is not possible to increase nsize to more than 20000k. When I specify e.g. > R --vsize=10M --nsize=21000K the result is: free total (Mb) Ncells 99658 350000 6.7 Vcells 1219173 1310720 10.0 Maybe I have overlooked s.th.... Marcus -- +------------------------------------------------------- | Marcus Eger | E-Mail: eger.m at gmx.de (NEW) |

Dear R users, I have noticed that my R startup is extremely slow. It takes almost 3 minutes from "double-click" to R prompt. I have been running R-0.64.1 till recently and it took about 30 sec. I still have access to R-0.64.1. When I started it up, it took about 25 sec. Can anyone tell me if this is a bug in R or a problem with my machine? Note: This is after bootup with R being the

I am trying to use tree to partition a data set. The data set has 3924 observations. Partitioning seems to work for small subsets of the data, but when I use the entire data set, no partitioning occurs. The variables are: RESP respondent to a survey (0 = not a respondent, 1 = respondent) AGE_P Age (continuous) ORIGIN_I Hispanic Ethnicity (1 = Hispanic, 2 = non-Hispanic) RACRECI2 Race

We have a project that calls for the creation of a list of many distribution objects. Distributions can be of various types, with various parameters, but we ran into some problems. I started testing on a simple list of rnorm-based objects. I was a little surprised at the RAM storage requirements, here's an example: N <- 10000 closureList <- vector("list", N) nsize = sample(x

I am running R version ??? under Redhat 5.2. It seems as though the --nsize object has no effct on the size of the allocated Ncells as determined using gc(). Yes, I have that much data.... That is if I envoke R with R --vsize 100 --nsize 5000000 then type gc() I get free total Ncells 92202 200000 Vcells 12928414 13107200 Thanks Tony Long Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Steinhaus

hi all i know that one should try and limit the amount of looping in R programs. i have supplied some code below. i am interested in seeing how the code cold be rewritten if we dont use the loops. a brief overview of what is done in the code. ============================================== ============================================== ============================================== 1. the input

Dear all, I don't get it: First of all, the help doesn't say what are the memory limits of R. Say, what's the max heap size for instance ???? Secondly, I invoke R with the following commands each time: rgui --vsize 30M --nsize 1000K rgui --vsize 30M --nsize 2000K rgui --vsize 30M --nsize 3000K rgui --vsize 30M --nsize 4000K I try to open a matrix 8000x8000 by issuing

Dear All, I am running R version 0.65.0 under a) Suse-Linux 6.1, and Suse-Linux 6.2, compiler gcc-2.95, CPUs pentium pro 200, 128MB, and pentium II 450, 128MB b) Solaris 5.7, compiler gcc-2.95, cpu SUN sparc, 4000MB When I set --nsize to more than 1M, R's internal storage management runs havoc. gc() indicates the requested sizes, but the overall process size is much too big: Running R with

My group is working with datasets between 100 Mb and 1 GB in size, using multiple log ins. From the documentation, it appears that vsize is limited to 2^30-1, which tends to prove too restrictive for our use. When we drop that restriction (set vsize = NA) we end up hanging the server, which requires a restart. Is there any way to increase the memory limits on R while keeping our jobs from

Martin M has suggested I widen this discussion to R-devel, and > I agree that we should increase them, > but I'm not sure at all about the amount. > > The default could even depend on the architecture (via "./configure").. Views, please. ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- Is is not time we increased the defaults a bit? As the base gets bigger I hit

Hi everyone, I have a problem that some people may have already encountered but i did not find the solution yet. As I use R to simulate several arrays of data, my workspace is now 35Mb big and I cannot launch R with it. An "xdr real data read error occured" and R tells me to delete .RData or increase memory. I WON'T delete this file and changing the max-nsize to 40600k did not

RHSrvAny.c was using a mixture of 4 space indentation, and tabs with a width of 4. This commit rationalises the whitespace to use only 4 space indentation, and removes trailing whitespace. --- RHSrvAny/RHSrvAny.c | 537 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- RHSrvAny/RHSrvAny.h | 1 - RHSrvAny/resource.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 269 insertions(+), 271 deletions(-) diff --git

Hi, somtimes i have trivial recodings like this: > dim(tt) [1] 252382 98 system.time(for(i in 2:length(tt)){ tt[,i][is.na(tt[,i])] <- 0 }) ...and a win2000(XP2000+,1GB) machine makes it in several minutes, but my linux notebook (XP2.6GHZ,512MB) don't get success after some hours. I recognize that the cpu load is most time relative small, but the hardisk

...lando, cuyo argumento principal es "res" que básicamente es una lista con un solo componente. Pero si el segundo argumento llamado "oneSize" es FALSE, "res" es una lista de listas. Lo que he escrito hasta el momento es lo siguiente: anthr <- function(res, oneSize, nsizes){ UseMethod("anthr") } anthr.tri <- function(res, oneSize, nsizes){ if(oneSize){ cases <- c() cases <- res$meds }else{ cases <- list() for (i in 1 : (nsizes - 1)){ cases[[i]] <- res[[i]]$meds } } return(cases) } El problema cuando...

Martin Morgan discussed this a year or so ago and as I recall bumped up these values to the current defaults. I don't recall details about why we didn't go higher -- maybe Martin does. I suspect the main concern would be with small memory machines in student labs and less developed countries. If there was a way on all platforms to identify how much memory is available that might help to

I am trying to translate code from S-PLUS to R and R really struggles! After starting R with the foll. R --vsize 50M --nsize 6M --no-restore on a 400 MHz Pentium with 192 MB of memory running Linux (RH 6.2), I run a function that essentially picks up an external dataset with 2121 rows and 30 columns and builds a lm() object and also runs step() ... the step() takes forever to run...(takes very

RHSrvAny.c was using a mixture of 4 space indentation, and tabs with a width of 4. This commit rationalises the whitespace to use only 4 space indentation, and removes trailing whitespace. --- RHSrvAny/RHSrvAny.c | 537 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- RHSrvAny/RHSrvAny.h | 1 - RHSrvAny/resource.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 269 insertions(+), 271 deletions(-) diff --git

G'day R friends, I didn't get any replies on the main list so I thought I'd try with the experts. I was wondering if anyone's ported R to os390. If so, are the vsize and nsize limits the same as other platforms? I could really annoy those SAS guys then. thanks, John Strumila john.strumila@team.telstra.com

Hello- Since my data bank in SPSS has > 40 variables, I think that R crashes because of the memory limit. In Maindonald?s UsingR text, on pg 3, there?s a footnote that reads: "If you want larger memory space than the default you may want a target akin to <path to binary>\rw091\bin\rgui.exe --visize 30M --nsize 1000K [The default is --vsize 6M --nsize 250K

Dear R-users, I am trying to run some simulations in batch mode. In an older version of the program, I used rterm --vsize=100M --nsize=5000K --restore --save <input file> output file, however, in the new version R 2.2.0 , the parameters vsize and nsize are ignored. I can use the command memory.limit to increase memory, but I am not sure if this corresponds to vsize and nsize.