Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "nsdf".
Did you mean:
asdf
2002 Sep 10
2
Hat values for generalized additive models
...ludes fixed
d.f. and free d.f. terms)
@@ -1247,7 +1250,7 @@
null.deviance = nulldev, iter = iter, weights = wt, prior.weights =
weights,
#df.residual = resdf,
df.null = nulldf, y = y, converged = conv,sig2=G$sig2,edf=G$edf,
- boundary = boundary,sp =
G$sp,df=G$df,nsdf=G$nsdf,Vp=G$Vp,mgcv.conv=G$conv,gcv.ubre=G$gcv.ubre)
+ boundary = boundary,sp =
G$sp,df=G$df,nsdf=G$nsdf,Vp=G$Vp,mgcv.conv=G$conv,gcv.ubre=G$gcv.ubre,
hat=G$hat)
}
diff -ur c:/usr/temp/work/mgcv/src/mgcv.c ./src/mgcv.c
--- c:/usr/temp/work/mgcv/src/mgcv.c 2002-05-17 02:51:22.000000000 +...
2008 Oct 01
1
Simon Wood GAMsetup
Dear Simon, Thank you for your quick reply!
I used to perform the GAMsetup in the following manner:
GAMsetup sintax:
x.summer: vector used for construct the spline
knots<-14
N<-length(x.summer)
x<-array(x.summer,dim=c(1,N))
G<-list(m=1,n=N,nsdf=0,df=knots+1,dim=1,s.type=0,by=0,by.exists=FALSE,p.order=0,x=x,n.knots=knots,fit.method="mgcv")
H<-GAMsetup(G)
with the new version mgcv 1.4.1 gam.setup this does no longer work and gives
me the following error:
Error in gam.setup(G) : First argument is no sort of formula!
What is...
2001 Dec 22
2
gam plots
Dear R users,
Using the library(mgcv) and running R under MacOSX, I have fitted a
generalised additive model with binomial errors in order to check the
linearity of two continuous variables ap2mm and diffdaysm in a glm:
> mymodel.gam <- gam(diedhos~ s(ap2mm) + Dweekm + s(diffdaysm) +
Dweekm:diffdaysm + ap2mm:Dweekm, binomial)
I would like postscript gam plots for the two smoothed
2011 Aug 10
0
GAM Prediction
...ut the entire model object is needed as input. I looked
into it further, and the predict method (using type='lpmatrix") depends on
the following model components:
object$model
object$terms
object$coefficients
object$contrasts
object$xlevels
object$pterms
object$nsdf
object$smooth
object$Xcentre
Stripping out the other object parts saves some space, but the "smooth" part
seems to still be storing all the original data. Isn't there some way that
I can just use the coefficients?
Thanks,
Gene
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]