Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "ns_name".
Did you mean:
s_name
2020 Jun 16
0
[PATCH v5 2/2] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()
...}
- kzfree(d->hash);
- kzfree(d->name);
+ kfree_sensitive(d->hash);
+ kfree_sensitive(d->name);
kvfree(d->data);
- kzfree(d);
+ kfree_sensitive(d);
}
void aa_loaddata_kref(struct kref *kref)
@@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ static struct aa_profile *unpack_profile(struct aa_ext *e, char **ns_name)
while (unpack_strdup(e, &key, NULL)) {
data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!data) {
- kzfree(key);
+ kfree_sensitive(key);
goto fail;
}
@@ -902,8 +902,8 @@ static struct aa_profile *unpack_profile(struct aa_ext *e, char **ns_name)
data->size = unpa...
2020 Apr 13
0
[PATCH 1/2] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()
...}
- kzfree(d->hash);
- kzfree(d->name);
+ kfree_sensitive(d->hash);
+ kfree_sensitive(d->name);
kvfree(d->data);
- kzfree(d);
+ kfree_sensitive(d);
}
void aa_loaddata_kref(struct kref *kref)
@@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ static struct aa_profile *unpack_profile(struct aa_ext *e, char **ns_name)
while (unpack_strdup(e, &key, NULL)) {
data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!data) {
- kzfree(key);
+ kfree_sensitive(key);
goto fail;
}
@@ -898,8 +898,8 @@ static struct aa_profile *unpack_profile(struct aa_ext *e, char **ns_name)
data->size = unpa...
2020 Jun 16
0
[PATCH v4 2/3] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()
...}
- kzfree(d->hash);
- kzfree(d->name);
+ kfree_sensitive(d->hash);
+ kfree_sensitive(d->name);
kvfree(d->data);
- kzfree(d);
+ kfree_sensitive(d);
}
void aa_loaddata_kref(struct kref *kref)
@@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ static struct aa_profile *unpack_profile(struct aa_ext *e, char **ns_name)
while (unpack_strdup(e, &key, NULL)) {
data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!data) {
- kzfree(key);
+ kfree_sensitive(key);
goto fail;
}
@@ -902,8 +902,8 @@ static struct aa_profile *unpack_profile(struct aa_ext *e, char **ns_name)
data->size = unpa...
2020 Jun 16
3
[PATCH v5 0/2] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()
v5:
- Break the btrfs patch out as a separate patch to be processed
independently.
- Update the commit log of patch 1 to make it less scary.
- Add a kzfree backward compatibility macro in patch 2.
v4:
- Break out the memzero_explicit() change as suggested by Dan Carpenter
so that it can be backported to stable.
- Drop the "crypto: Remove unnecessary
2017 Jul 02
2
Dovecot 2.2.31: IMAP core dumped after upgrade
...= <value optimized out>
#6 0x00007f1684067c43 in mailbox_list_subscription_fill_one
(src_list=0xd5e598, dest_list=0xd607c8)
at mailbox-list-subscriptions.c:68
ns = 0xd60660
namespaces = <value optimized out>
vname = <value optimized out>
ns_name = 0xd6f172 "shared/myuser2/INBOX"
node = <value optimized out>
created = false
default_ns = 0xd60660
error = 0x7f1684517c55 "I\211\303L\213L$0L\213D$(H\213|$
H\213t$\030H\213T$\020H\213L$\bH\213\004$H\203\304HA\377\343ffffff.\017\037\204&quo...
2020 Jun 16
14
[PATCH v4 0/3] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()
v4:
- Break out the memzero_explicit() change as suggested by Dan Carpenter
so that it can be backported to stable.
- Drop the "crypto: Remove unnecessary memzero_explicit()" patch for
now as there can be a bit more discussion on what is best. It will be
introduced as a separate patch later on after this one is merged.
This patchset makes a global rename of the kzfree()
2020 Jun 16
14
[PATCH v4 0/3] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()
v4:
- Break out the memzero_explicit() change as suggested by Dan Carpenter
so that it can be backported to stable.
- Drop the "crypto: Remove unnecessary memzero_explicit()" patch for
now as there can be a bit more discussion on what is best. It will be
introduced as a separate patch later on after this one is merged.
This patchset makes a global rename of the kzfree()
2020 Apr 13
10
[PATCH 0/2] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()
This patchset makes a global rename of the kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()
to highlight the fact buffer clearing is only needed if the data objects
contain sensitive information like encrpytion key. The fact that kzfree()
uses memset() to do the clearing isn't totally safe either as compiler
may compile out the clearing in their optimizer. Instead, the new
kfree_sensitive() uses
2010 Dec 01
3
Error While installing Wine on OSX version 10.4.1.1!!
...:info:build ../../tools/makedep -C. -S../.. -T../.. dmusic32_main.c version.rc
> :info:build config.status: creating dlls/dnsapi/Makefile
> :info:build config.status: creating dlls/dnsapi/tests/Makefile
> :info:build ../../tools/makedep -C. -S../.. -T../.. main.c name.c ns_name.c ns_parse.c query.c record.c version.rc
> :info:build ../../../tools/makedep -xo -xcross.o -C. -S../../.. -T../../.. name.c record.c
> :info:build config.status: creating dlls/dplay/Makefile
> :info:build config.status: creating dlls/dplayx/Makefile
> :i...