Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "nowish".
Did you mean:
newish
2010 Aug 17
0
[LLVMdev] Ocaml bindings in 2.8
...nzhou,
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does 2.8 release plan to change anything in Ocaml bindings?
> http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#whatsnew does not list any
> relevant features.
I usually wait until around nowish before a release to sync llvm-c and
the ocaml bindings. I'll start the process. Is there anything in
particular you are looking for? I'm happy to integrate patches for
you.
> 2.7 added 'operand' that can access each operand from a value.
> external operand : llvalue -> i...
2012 Aug 05
1
BIG changes to kernel module
...ressions as quickly as possible, so
please report any issues to this list and/or the freedesktop bugzilla.
There's two areas that didn't get "properly" ported over, that is PM-related
things and modesetting. I'll be handling the modesetting and clk/volt reworks
starting from nowish (in between fixing regressions), and I suspect Martin
will handle the rest of the PM bits (therm and fanctrl) since he knows the
design he's going for there.
One thing to note is that some kernel module options have changed now, the
more important ones are:
nouveau.vbios=<blah> -> no...
2010 Aug 15
4
[LLVMdev] Ocaml bindings in 2.8
Hi,
Does 2.8 release plan to change anything in Ocaml bindings?
http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#whatsnew does not list any
relevant features.
2.7 added 'operand' that can access each operand from a value.
external operand : llvalue -> int -> llvalue = "llvm_operand"
Does this binding also expose a primitive to return how many operands
a given value has?
I need
2006 May 09
12
prototype: leak with Element.extend
Had a nasty memory leak that was seriously slowing down the browser and
eating up a couple megabytes every reload. I was using:
$$(''.dyntable'').each(function(elm) { new DynTable(elm) });
To set up my behavior, but discovered that just running:
$$(''.dyntable'');
Caused the memory leak all by itself.
The fix I found for it was to change Element.extend to a