search for: noriega

Are their issues with Samba and Lustre working together? I remember something about turning oplocks off in samba, and while testing samba I noticed this [2010/08/27 17:30:59, 3] lib/util.c:fcntl_getlock(2064) fcntl_getlock: lock request failed at offset 75694080 count 65536 type 1 (Function not implemented) But I also found out about the flock option for lustre. Should I set flock on all

I've setup a samba server on a Lustre client to export the lustre file system to our windows users. I'm getting the following message repeated over and over and I don't know what it means. I can say that I currently do not have any quota system setup, but Lustre has its own quota system that isn't accessible through standard quotactl(2) calls. It uses llapi_quotactl(3).

...preventing anyone from logging in. The PDC was running Samba 3.6 from Sernet, but downgraded to 3.5 as part of CentOS 6. As a test, I put a typo in the config for the location of the smbldap-useradd script, but no errors. So Samba isnt executing the script and I'm not sure why not. -- David Noriega CSBC/CBI System Administrator University of Texas at San Antonio One UTSA Circle San Antonio, TX 78249 Office: BSE 3.114 Phone: 210-458-7100 http://www.cbi.utsa.edu Please remember to acknowledge the RCMI grant , wording should be as stated below: This work received computational support from Comp...

I'm finding that roaming profiles are not being created on the server and when a user logons, they are getting temporary profiles. The logs dont mention any obvious errors and in the directory I have set aside for profiles, a folder for the user is created, but nothing is put there. Running CentOS 5 with samba 3.0.33

...and I don't hear the queue messages, only the MOH... As seen, the config etc comes from the queues-with-callback-members.txt file. But since I don't read AEL, I had to wing it... Since nothing actually works, I must have missed something big... -- arrangements DES class struggle Khaddafi Noriega North Korea president killed ammonium Marxist Mossad Panama Iran Saddam Hussein domestic disruption [See http://www.echelonwatch.org/ for more about this] http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/09/06/eu_releases_echelon_spying_report/ http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nsaspying/23989res20060131.html#echelon

Just some background: In our environment, we are running both a PDC and BDC. The local network setup has static ips on a different subnet from dhcp ips, thus the PDC has a static ip and the BDC has a dynamic one so the Windows machines are able to see the domain without hardcoding in the ip of the PDC as a wins on each machine. This has worked fine for Windows XP. We are also using ldap as the

I have a PDC+LDAP as well as a BDC+LDAP in another subnet setup with a domain member in the same subnet as the BDC. From my understanding the domain member should be hitting the BDC for all authentication but watching the logs I see the PDC is the one handling it all. The BDC just sits there. Am I missing something? Here are the smb.conf for each servers: PDC: [global] workgroup = X.X.X

I've had the following setup working for years now. Subnet A contains linux/windows workstations along with the PDC+LDAP. Subnet B contains a BDC+LDAP and a domain member on the file server that windows users connect too. Whats new is I'm setting up a new domain member in Subnet B. It has joined the domain and net getdomainsid works. From machines in Subnet B I can run smbclient -L and

...__ selective about who its friends are / / | | '_ \| | | \ \/ / Debian Certified Linux Developer _ /// / /__| | | | | |_| |> < Turbo Fredriksson turbo@tripnet.se \\\/ \____/_|_| |_|\__,_/_/\_\ Stockholm/Sweden Ft. Meade Mossad jihad NSA nuclear munitions plutonium Noriega BATF Uzi supercomputer AK-47 killed class struggle ammonium [See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this] Return-Path: <nailed@videotron.ca> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from VL-MS-MR002.sc1.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by list...

Dear all, sorry to be an annoyance. The spanish language RoR list has switched from a yahoogroup to a proper (mailman) list and has a new home at http://lists.simplelogica.net/mailman/admin/ror-es -- Manuel a veces :) a veces :( pero siempre trabajando duro para Simplelógica: apariencia, experiencia y comunicación en la web. http://simplelogica.net # (+34) 985 22 12 65 ¡Ah! y

I have a curious message I get repeatedly every so often on a samba domain member that serves up our network's home and group shares. [2009/07/07 12:24:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(939) [2009/07/07 12:24:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr_internal(1607) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected read_socket_with_timeout: client 0.0.0.0 read

I've been using samba for several years now and so my configuration hasnt changed much in that time. We've setup a samba pdc+ldap backend and previously using smbldap-tools. I haven't had to add a new machine in a long while until recently a new user said they couldn't remote desktop to a windows server I have part of our domain. Older users still were able to access it. I decided

I have Samba 3.2.4 running on Solaris 10 from sunfreeware. From what I can tell just recently happened to this server, which runs as a BDC + LDAP. Previously I have been able to authenticate against it as well as map drives from it. Though now it complains about no such user exists, though they do. here is the log entries, level 2 With correct password [2009/07/02 12:21:33, 2]