search for: nonexclusive

...'hidden text' utilizing voip-info.org's name or trademarks. Any unauthorized use terminates the permission or license granted by voip-info.org. and later on: When you enter content into any area of this web site, unless stated otherwise, you grant voip-info.org and its affiliates a nonexclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, and fully sublicensable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, and display such content throughout the world in any media. The wiki is a great resource and I'm very grateful that the infrastru...

...an't this be used to include PAC data on a kerberos ticket in order to use the kerberos autentication on win2k/xp? I know that it also requires some things on the ldap server, but This license says: "? 2002 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft grants you a perpetual, nonexclusive, royalty-free, world-wide right and license under any Microsoft copyrights in this specification to copy, publish and distribute this specification, and to implement this specification in your products." (...) What do you think? Ildefonso Camargo icamargo@merkurio.com.ve ildefonso_camargo...

A few days ago, I sent a question to the r-help list enquiring about the *** LEGALITY *** of porting a function from Splus into R. As a particular example, I referred to error.bar. Several people posted code for various versions of error.bar which they had written, but that was NOT WHAT I WAS ASKING FOR/ABOUT!!! [Can't anybody ***read*** these days?] I asked: IS IT

David, I'm glad you mentioned Discord's T&Cs. I'm not generally concerned about these kinds of things, but Discord's seems particularly aggressive. Particularly the phrase "perpetual, nonexclusive, transferable, royalty-free, sublicensable, and worldwide license" is... a lot. Since LLVM is a permissively licensed project I assume many of our contributors care about licensing, and that might be a shared concern. Since people have mentioned Slack on this thread, have you by chance looked...

During some discussions and handwaving, including discussions with some experts on the Xenserver/XCP storage architecture, we came up with what we think might be a plausible proposal for an architecture for communication between toolstack and driver domain, for storage at least. I offered to write it up. The abstract proposal is as I understand the consensus from our conversation. The concrete

Forwarded to R-Help, because I think it could interest people following this thread. Clearly, RServe and svSocket have different goals and very little overlap. Best, Philippe -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Video demo of using svSocket with data.table Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:34:19 +0100 From: Matthew Dowle <mdowle at mdowle.plus.com> Reply-To: Matthew Dowle

Hello, list: I have two puppet modules that are unrelated to each other, but both have (unrelated) Python scripts that parse YAML. As such, both have a block like the following in their manifests for the PyYAML script dependency: package { ''PyYAML'': ensure => installed, } If I try and include both modules on the same server this causes an obvious

Hello everyone, *Short version:*I've set up an LLVM Discord server for real time chat (similar to IRC) and an LLVM Discourse server for forums (similar to email lists): https://discord.gg/xS7Z362 https://llvm.discourse.group/ Please join and use these new services. They are only partially set up and still very new, so don't hesitate to improve them and/or reach out to this thread with