search for: noisili

On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:09:28 -0300 Gilberto Nunes via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Thanks.... I hope this is my last post with this matter! I hope it's your last post on any matter. You quit Samba very noisily. If you don't remember doing so, just look at the subject line. Don't look back. Go to your beloved Windows CIFS. You've found somebody better:

On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 18:48 +1100, Damien Miller wrote: > Our ability to influence people who run truly obsolete software is > extremely limited. +1, mostly because those who still use something that outdated in their products are either dead, or simply don't care about their customer's security (which is typical in the embedded devices area). Just by us (or anyone else) saying

The manual says that without --recursive directories are (noisily) skiped. However with --relative intermediate directories are created. So what happens if you give only -R? Is -d the default? And what happens when you give -R --no-dirs? I tried and it seems that intermediate dirs are considered anyway, so it looks like -R overrides --no-dirs. Is it true? Does it depend on the order of options?

Perhaps this could work: 2016-09-28 17:18 GMT-03:00 Gaiseric Vandal via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> : > I think there was a web app called SWAT. The problem I have with the > samba web app or gui config tools (I think redhat had one) is that they > might delete any fine tuning you set in smb.conf. > > > > > > > > > On 09/28/16 16:01, Steve Litt

$ virt-sparsify input output [ 0.0] Create overlay file in /tmp to protect source disk [ 0.0] Examine source disk ^C guestfs_close: g->lock: Device or resource busy Aborted (core dumped) The reason for this is because virt-sparsify calls exit(2) in the SIGINT signal handler, which causes the close_handles atexit handler to run, which calls guestfs_close. However the same handle is in the

On Jul 9, 2014, at 11:24 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm at mittelstaedt.us> wrote: > Someone could write a driver for MODBUS for NUT, all of the information > and materials are available to do it. The simple fact of it is that the > reason no one has done so is that the apcupsd program is available. You're right, it's the microlink protocol that they have been promising to

Protocols and ciphers are sunsetted all the time, this is a regular thing, but there are announcements before breaking changes are inserted. You assume people are slow to update anyway; some are, some aren't, what you're doing is wildly rewarding the slow updaters and punishing the fast ones. That has negative effects elsewhere. What would it hurt to announce the release in 3-6 months

In can_extents we test whether the VDDK function VixDiskLib_QueryAllocatedBlocks works before declaring that extents are supported. This VDDK function can fail in several ways but most notable if the server doesn't support querying extents. In this case VDDK raises an error message through the error_function callback, which we turn into a call to nbdkit_error. In most cases this will cause

There's a world of difference between changing defaults and killing functionality. SSH in general and OpenSSH in particular is part of what we'll eventually get around to identifying as (I know everyone hates this word) critical infrastructure. That means it doesn't break, particularly not intentionally, and even more particularly not without time, warning, and probably public input.

On 7/9/2014 4:16 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Jul 9, 2014, at 11:24 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt<tedm at mittelstaedt.us> > wrote: > >> Someone could write a driver for MODBUS for NUT, all of the >> information and materials are available to do it. The simple fact >> of it is that the reason no one has done so is that the apcupsd >> program is available. > >

Ok. I seem to be having some real problems today :) There is a link from the main page straight to the Wx::Frame tutorial, under the NEWS section. http://wxruby.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl Sorry for wasting everyone''s time :( Robert _________________________________________________________________ Getting married? Find tips, tools and the latest trends at MSN Life Events.

I’ve seen this done in the past without compiler support (for the case of handwritten or JIT’d, etc functions that need checking). It worked something like this: 1. Pass calls to the risky functions through a macro/template or such. 2. In release mode, this turns into a no-op. In debug mode, this sends the calls through a handwritten asm wrapper that sets all the callee-save registers to random

On May 31, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > I'm not sure that this solves the problem. The reason we have dual licenses for the runtime stuff is that we don't want the UIUC license (which has a binary attribution clause) to affect stuff built with the compiler. Saying that "clang -fasan produces code that has to binary attribute the LLVM license" is pretty lame.

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On May 31, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > I'm not sure that this solves the problem. The reason we have dual >> licenses for the runtime stuff is that we don't want the UIUC license >> (which has a binary attribution clause) to affect stuff built with the >>

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On May 31, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Rafael Espíndola < > rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 31 May 2012 05:02, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > tl;dr

On 7/9/2014 6:51 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Jul 9, 2014, at 6:31 AM, Eric S. Raymond<esr at thyrsus.com> wrote: > >> What I'd like to do is this: confer in real-time, perhaps via IRC, >> with someone who knows this process. Ask about every step >> (thought processes and diagnostics). *Write them down* and turn >> this into a document on how to qualify

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at googlemail.com>wrote: > > On 01.06.2012, at 08:14, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> > wrote: > > On May 31, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > >> I'm not sure that this solves the problem.

I was told that my earlier submission of this report contained a user-hostile attachment (courtesy of Outlook), so here it is again, with the log included below. The problem: Files that exist only on the remote system are deleted silently (i.e. not logged), rather than noisily as implied by the recommendation of --dry-run in the rsync man page definition of --delete to see what would be

Earlier today I added this feature: http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=libguestfs.git;a=commitdiff;h=34d2df41626f1ee4172a6d40b06d72d6ed9d6348 Unfortunately this feature doesn't work out. I forgot about kernel modules, which are contained in the initramfs, and stop working noisily if you just try to change the kernel. So I'm going to revert this patch, and perhaps think of some other way to do

On 01.06.2012, at 08:14, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On May 31, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: >> I'm not sure that this solves the problem. The reason we have dual licenses for the runtime stuff is that we don't want the UIUC license (which has a binary attribution