search for: noexception

On Aug 10, 2018, at 1:28 PM, Marshall Clow via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > * The clock stuff being added in C++20 has already been discussed here. I’ve missed the discussions on file_time_type, however I thought I should throw in my opinion here before it is too late to do anything about it. I believe it is a mistake to model file_time_type with 128 bits. It

On 9 Feb 2017, at 08:41, Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > What isn’t clear to me still is : why shouldn't this be transitive? > In the example you’re showing, for a caller of f() in bar, what is the advantage of knowing that f() is nounwind if it an

On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Stephan Tolksdorf <st at quanttec.com> wrote: > Hi, > > When clang/LLVM can't prove that a noexcept function only contains > non-throwing code, it seems to insert an explicit exception handler that > calls std::terminate. Why doesn't clang leave it to the eh personality > function to call std::terminate when an exception is thrown

Hi, Thanks for the quick reply again. > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM, David Fang <fang at csl.cornell.edu> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've bootstrapped llvm/clang from svn-trunk on powerpc-darwin8 (g++-4.0.1), and >> have the following test results to share. >> Summary below, full log at: >>

On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > On Mar 2, 2014, at 8:53 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > > > On 3 March 2014 12:32, Pete Cooper <peter_cooper at apple.com> wrote: > >> Would those work with a foreach construct? Perhaps I forgot to mention > that was what I'm trying to work out

I was looking at the ClassTemplatePartialSpecializationDecl::getInstantiatedFromMember documentation, in the included example it says: "(..) the instantiation of Outer<float>::Inner<int*> will end up instantiating the partial specialization Outer<float>::Inner<U*> (...)". To understand the concept better, I dumped the AST for the following code:

Lately I've been using some utilities to increase the number of logic errors caught at compile time. I thought they might be useful to the LLVM project. I'd appreciate feedback on the below proposal. Would the community find these useful? -David RFC: Strong typedef utilities for LLVM -------------------------------------- Abstract -------- This proposal

...* clang-x64-ninja-win7 * clang-solaris11-sparcv9 * clang-cmake-armv7-full * clang-cmake-thumbv7-full-sh * clang-cmake-armv8-lld * clang-cmake-aarch64-full * clang-armv7-linux-build-cache * clang-aarch64-linux-build-cache * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-debian * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-debian-noexceptions * libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-x86_64-linux-debian * libcxx-libcxxabi-singlethreaded-x86_64-linux-debian * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx03 * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx11 * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx14 * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx17 * libcxx-libcxx...

I am nuilding that now. CC=clang CXX=clang++ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$HOME/opt/llvm11-git \ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \ -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON \ -DLLVM_ENABLE_EH=ON \ -DLLVM_ENABLE_RTTI=ON \ -DLLVM_HOST_TRIPLE=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu \ -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="AMDGPU;MSP430;WebAssembly;X86" \

...* llvm-clang-x86_64-win-fast <<-- ? > * llvm-sphinx-docs > * clang-x86_64-debian-fast > * libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-x86_64-linux-debian > * libcxx-libcxxabi-singlethreaded-x86_64-linux-debian > * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-debian > * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-debian-noexceptions > > A friendly reminder. If your bots are using one of these build factories, you would need either update your build configurations to use one of the currently supported build factories, or port that factory to work with github and monorepo. > > * LLVMBuilder (3 bots) > * PollyBuil...

Hi, Using master at b0a1c0b72c9c61f8b0a223e08f43498abb64f5e8, I cannot build LLVM. I configured with: CC=clang CXX=clang++ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$HOME/opt/llvm11-git \ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \ -DLLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON \ -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON \ -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF \ -DLLVM_ENABLE_EH=ON \ -DLLVM_ENABLE_RTTI=ON \

...buildername | was_red ---------------------------------------------------------+--------- libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-aarch64-linux | 50:00:17 libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-armv8-linux | 47:23:17 libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-aarch64-linux-noexceptions | 40:53:18 libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-armv8-linux-noexceptions | 40:53:18 clang-x86-windows-msvc2015 | 35:17:24 clang-cmake-armv8-full | 28:20:50 reverse-iteration | 28:18:29 clang-bpf-bu...

...---------------------------------------------+--------- clang-x86-windows-msvc2015 | 85:23:18 clang-x64-ninja-win7 | 81:13:04 libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-aarch64-linux | 50:42:01 libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-armv8-linux-noexceptions | 50:41:57 lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.04-android | 46:42:43 clang-s390x-linux-lnt | 41:07:18 clang-s390x-linux-multistage | 39:44:42 clang-s390x-linux | 39:29:54 lldb-amd64...

...The longest time each builder was red during the week: buildername | was_red ---------------------------------------------------------+--------- libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-armv8-linux | 87:08:24 libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-armv8-linux-noexceptions | 87:08:06 libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx17 | 85:42:47 libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-x86_64-linux-ubuntu | 85:42:17 libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx2a | 85:42:14 libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-32bit | 85:41:45 libcxx-lib...

There is a fair amount of dispute and detail here, and real benchmarks can be difficult to write, because you often end up in arguments about whether or not the two styles of coding are equivalent or not. But I agree with Dave--exceptions generally inhibit optimization. One way to think about this is that, generally speaking, the less the compiler can prove about a program, the less aggressive

...lang-x86_64-debian-fast | 02:33:02 sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan | 02:18:02 clang-ppc64le-linux-lnt | 02:14:19 clang-ppc64be-linux-multistage | 02:10:09 libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-debian-noexceptions | 02:09:45 libcxx-libcxxabi-singlethreaded-x86_64-linux-debian | 02:09:28 sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fuzzer | 02:06:06 reverse-iteration | 02:05:03 sanitizer-windows | 02:04:59 libcxx-libcxxabi-l...

Hi All, I recently committed <filesystem> to trunk. I wanted to bring attention to some quirks it currently has. First, it's been put in a separate library, libc++fs, for now. Users are responsible for linking the library when they use filesystem. Second, it should still not be considered ABI stable. Vendors should be aware of this before shipping it. Hopefully all the standard and

...| 295 | 0 | 0.0 clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules-2 | 302 | 0 | 0.0 libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-aarch64-linux | 9 | 0 | 0.0 libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-aarch64-linux-noexceptions | 9 | 0 | 0.0 libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-armv7-linux | 8 | 0 | 0.0 libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-armv7-linux-noexceptions | 8 | 0 | 0.0 libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-armv8-linux |...

...llvm-sphinx-docs > > > * clang-x86_64-debian-fast > > > * libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-x86_64-linux-debian > > > * libcxx-libcxxabi-singlethreaded-x86_64-linux-debian > > > * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-debian > > > * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-debian-noexceptions > > > > > > A friendly reminder. If your bots are using one of these build > factories, you would need either update your build configurations to use > one of the currently supported build factories, or port that factory to > work with github and monorepo. > > >...

...| 2 | 0 | 0.0 perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-parallel-fast | 229 | 0 | 0.0 perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-unprofitable | 262 | 0 | 0.0 libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-aarch64-linux-noexceptions | 16 | 0 | 0.0 libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-aarch64-linux | 16 | 0 | 0.0 clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules-2 | 292 | 0 | 0.0 clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules |...