search for: no_more_repli

...tio_vsock_pkt *pkt; > - int head, pkts = 0, total_len = 0; > + int ret, pkts = 0, total_len = 0; > + struct vhost_buf buf; > unsigned int out, in; > bool added = false; > > @@ -461,12 +465,13 @@ static void vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work) > goto no_more_replies; > } > > - head = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), > - &out, &in, NULL, NULL); > - if (head < 0) > + ret = vhost_get_avail_buf(vq, &buf, > + vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), > + &out, &in, NULL, NU...

...tio_vsock_pkt *pkt; > - int head, pkts = 0, total_len = 0; > + int ret, pkts = 0, total_len = 0; > + struct vhost_buf buf; > unsigned int out, in; > bool added = false; > > @@ -461,12 +465,13 @@ static void vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work) > goto no_more_replies; > } > > - head = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), > - &out, &in, NULL, NULL); > - if (head < 0) > + ret = vhost_get_avail_buf(vq, &buf, > + vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), > + &out, &in, NULL, NU...

...ruct vhost_work *work) else virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt); - vhost_add_used(vq, head, sizeof(pkt->hdr) + len); + len += sizeof(pkt->hdr); + vhost_add_used(vq, head, len); + total_len += len; added = true; - } + } while(likely(!vhost_exceeds_weight(vq, ++pkts, total_len))); no_more_replies: if (added) -- 1.8.3.1

...vhost_vsock, dev); struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt; - int head, pkts = 0, total_len = 0; + int ret, pkts = 0, total_len = 0; + struct vhost_buf buf; unsigned int out, in; bool added = false; @@ -461,12 +465,13 @@ static void vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work) goto no_more_replies; } - head = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), - &out, &in, NULL, NULL); - if (head < 0) + ret = vhost_get_avail_buf(vq, &buf, + vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), + &out, &in, NULL, NULL); + if (ret < 0) break; -...

...vhost_vsock, dev); struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt; - int head, pkts = 0, total_len = 0; + int ret, pkts = 0, total_len = 0; + struct vhost_buf buf; unsigned int out, in; bool added = false; @@ -461,12 +465,13 @@ static void vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work) goto no_more_replies; } - head = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), - &out, &in, NULL, NULL); - if (head < 0) + ret = vhost_get_avail_buf(vq, &buf, + vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), + &out, &in, NULL, NULL); + if (ret < 0) break; -...

...vhost_vsock, dev); struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt; - int head, pkts = 0, total_len = 0; + int ret, pkts = 0, total_len = 0; + struct vhost_buf buf; unsigned int out, in; bool added = false; @@ -461,12 +465,13 @@ static void vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work) goto no_more_replies; } - head = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), - &out, &in, NULL, NULL); - if (head < 0) + ret = vhost_get_avail_buf(vq, &buf, + vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), + &out, &in, NULL, NULL); + if (ret < 0) break; -...

..., pkts = 0, total_len = 0; > > + int ret, pkts = 0, total_len = 0; > > + struct vhost_buf buf; > > unsigned int out, in; > > bool added = false; > > > > @@ -461,12 +465,13 @@ static void vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work) > > goto no_more_replies; > > } > > > > - head = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), > > - &out, &in, NULL, NULL); > > - if (head < 0) > > + ret = vhost_get_avail_buf(vq, &buf, > > + vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), >...

Hi: This series try to prvernt a guest triggerable CPU hogging through vhost kthread. This is done by introducing and checking the weight after each requrest. The patch has been tested with reproducer of vsock and virtio-net. Only compile test is done for vhost-scsi. Please review. This addresses CVE-2019-3900. Jason Wang (4): vhost: introduce vhost_exceeds_weight() vhost_net: fix possible

Hi: This series try to prevent a guest triggerable CPU hogging through vhost kthread. This is done by introducing and checking the weight after each requrest. The patch has been tested with reproducer of vsock and virtio-net. Only compile test is done for vhost-scsi. Please review. This addresses CVE-2019-3900. Changs from V1: - fix user-ater-free in vosck patch Jason Wang (4): vhost:

Hi: This series try to prevent a guest triggerable CPU hogging through vhost kthread. This is done by introducing and checking the weight after each requrest. The patch has been tested with reproducer of vsock and virtio-net. Only compile test is done for vhost-scsi. Please review. This addresses CVE-2019-3900. Changs from V1: - fix user-ater-free in vosck patch Jason Wang (4): vhost:

This adds infrastructure required for supporting multiple ring formats. The idea is as follows: we convert descriptors to an independent format first, and process that converting to iov later. Used ring is similar: we fetch into an independent struct first, convert that to IOV later. The point is that we have a tight loop that fetches descriptors, which is good for cache utilization. This will

This series is based on v4.7. This RFC is the implementation for the new VIRTIO Socket device. It is developed in parallel with the VIRTIO device specification and proves the design. Once the specification has been accepted I will send a non-RFC version of this patch series. v6: * Add VHOST_VSOCK_SET_RUNNING ioctl to start/stop vhost cleanly * Add graceful shutdown to avoid port reuse while

This series is based on v4.7. This RFC is the implementation for the new VIRTIO Socket device. It is developed in parallel with the VIRTIO device specification and proves the design. Once the specification has been accepted I will send a non-RFC version of this patch series. v6: * Add VHOST_VSOCK_SET_RUNNING ioctl to start/stop vhost cleanly * Add graceful shutdown to avoid port reuse while

This adds infrastructure required for supporting multiple ring formats. The idea is as follows: we convert descriptors to an independent format first, and process that converting to iov later. Used ring is similar: we fetch into an independent struct first, convert that to IOV later. The point is that we have a tight loop that fetches descriptors, which is good for cache utilization. This will

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with pmd implement by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html. Minor change was needed for pmd codes to kick virtqueue since it assumes a busy polling backend. Test were done between localhost and guest. Testpmd (rxonly) in guest reports 2.4Mpps. Testpmd (txonly) repots about 2.1Mpps. Notes: The event

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with pmd implement by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html. Minor change was needed for pmd codes to kick virtqueue since it assumes a busy polling backend. Test were done between localhost and guest. Testpmd (rxonly) in guest reports 2.4Mpps. Testpmd (txonly) repots about 2.1Mpps. Notes: The event

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V3 ahttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/25/34. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run for event index. Pktgen reports about 20% improvement on PPS (event index is off). More testing is ongoing. Notes for tester: - Start from this version, vhost need qemu co-operation to work

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V3 ahttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/25/34. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run for event index. Pktgen reports about 20% improvement on PPS (event index is off). More testing is ongoing. Notes for tester: - Start from this version, vhost need qemu co-operation to work

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V2 a thttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/1/48. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run. TCP stream and pktgen does not show obvious difference compared with split ring. Changes from V2: - do not use & in checking desc_event_flags - off should be most significant bit -

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V2 a thttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/1/48. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run. TCP stream and pktgen does not show obvious difference compared with split ring. Changes from V2: - do not use & in checking desc_event_flags - off should be most significant bit -