Stefano Garzarella
2020-Jun-08 10:17 UTC
[PATCH RFC v5 12/13] vhost/vsock: switch to the buf API
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 10:11:49AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:> A straight-forward conversion. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > --- > drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)The changes for vsock part LGTM: Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare at redhat.com> I also did some tests with vhost-vsock (tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test and iperf-vsock), so for vsock: Tested-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare at redhat.com> Thanks, Stefano> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c > index a483cec31d5c..61c6d3dd2ae3 100644 > --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c > @@ -103,7 +103,8 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, > unsigned out, in; > size_t nbytes; > size_t iov_len, payload_len; > - int head; > + struct vhost_buf buf; > + int ret; > > spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); > if (list_empty(&vsock->send_pkt_list)) { > @@ -117,16 +118,17 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, > list_del_init(&pkt->list); > spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); > > - head = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), > - &out, &in, NULL, NULL); > - if (head < 0) { > + ret = vhost_get_avail_buf(vq, &buf, > + vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), > + &out, &in, NULL, NULL); > + if (ret < 0) { > spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); > list_add(&pkt->list, &vsock->send_pkt_list); > spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); > break; > } > > - if (head == vq->num) { > + if (!ret) { > spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); > list_add(&pkt->list, &vsock->send_pkt_list); > spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); > @@ -186,7 +188,8 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, > */ > virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt(pkt); > > - vhost_add_used(vq, head, sizeof(pkt->hdr) + payload_len); > + buf.in_len = sizeof(pkt->hdr) + payload_len; > + vhost_put_used_buf(vq, &buf); > added = true; > > pkt->off += payload_len; > @@ -440,7 +443,8 @@ static void vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work) > struct vhost_vsock *vsock = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_vsock, > dev); > struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt; > - int head, pkts = 0, total_len = 0; > + int ret, pkts = 0, total_len = 0; > + struct vhost_buf buf; > unsigned int out, in; > bool added = false; > > @@ -461,12 +465,13 @@ static void vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work) > goto no_more_replies; > } > > - head = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), > - &out, &in, NULL, NULL); > - if (head < 0) > + ret = vhost_get_avail_buf(vq, &buf, > + vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), > + &out, &in, NULL, NULL); > + if (ret < 0) > break; > > - if (head == vq->num) { > + if (!ret) { > if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq))) { > vhost_disable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq); > continue; > @@ -494,7 +499,8 @@ static void vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work) > virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt); > > len += sizeof(pkt->hdr); > - vhost_add_used(vq, head, len); > + buf.in_len = len; > + vhost_put_used_buf(vq, &buf); > total_len += len; > added = true; > } while(likely(!vhost_exceeds_weight(vq, ++pkts, total_len))); > -- > MST >
Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-Jun-08 13:30 UTC
[PATCH RFC v5 12/13] vhost/vsock: switch to the buf API
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 12:17:46PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:> On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 10:11:49AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > A straight-forward conversion. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > > --- > > drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------ > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > The changes for vsock part LGTM: > > Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare at redhat.com> > > > I also did some tests with vhost-vsock (tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test > and iperf-vsock), so for vsock: > > Tested-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare at redhat.com> > > Thanks, > StefanoRe-testing v6 would be very much appreciated.> > > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c > > index a483cec31d5c..61c6d3dd2ae3 100644 > > --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c > > @@ -103,7 +103,8 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, > > unsigned out, in; > > size_t nbytes; > > size_t iov_len, payload_len; > > - int head; > > + struct vhost_buf buf; > > + int ret; > > > > spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); > > if (list_empty(&vsock->send_pkt_list)) { > > @@ -117,16 +118,17 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, > > list_del_init(&pkt->list); > > spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); > > > > - head = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), > > - &out, &in, NULL, NULL); > > - if (head < 0) { > > + ret = vhost_get_avail_buf(vq, &buf, > > + vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), > > + &out, &in, NULL, NULL); > > + if (ret < 0) { > > spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); > > list_add(&pkt->list, &vsock->send_pkt_list); > > spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); > > break; > > } > > > > - if (head == vq->num) { > > + if (!ret) { > > spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); > > list_add(&pkt->list, &vsock->send_pkt_list); > > spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); > > @@ -186,7 +188,8 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, > > */ > > virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt(pkt); > > > > - vhost_add_used(vq, head, sizeof(pkt->hdr) + payload_len); > > + buf.in_len = sizeof(pkt->hdr) + payload_len; > > + vhost_put_used_buf(vq, &buf); > > added = true; > > > > pkt->off += payload_len; > > @@ -440,7 +443,8 @@ static void vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work) > > struct vhost_vsock *vsock = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_vsock, > > dev); > > struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt; > > - int head, pkts = 0, total_len = 0; > > + int ret, pkts = 0, total_len = 0; > > + struct vhost_buf buf; > > unsigned int out, in; > > bool added = false; > > > > @@ -461,12 +465,13 @@ static void vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work) > > goto no_more_replies; > > } > > > > - head = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), > > - &out, &in, NULL, NULL); > > - if (head < 0) > > + ret = vhost_get_avail_buf(vq, &buf, > > + vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), > > + &out, &in, NULL, NULL); > > + if (ret < 0) > > break; > > > > - if (head == vq->num) { > > + if (!ret) { > > if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq))) { > > vhost_disable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq); > > continue; > > @@ -494,7 +499,8 @@ static void vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work) > > virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt); > > > > len += sizeof(pkt->hdr); > > - vhost_add_used(vq, head, len); > > + buf.in_len = len; > > + vhost_put_used_buf(vq, &buf); > > total_len += len; > > added = true; > > } while(likely(!vhost_exceeds_weight(vq, ++pkts, total_len))); > > -- > > MST > >
Stefano Garzarella
2020-Jun-08 16:26 UTC
[PATCH RFC v5 12/13] vhost/vsock: switch to the buf API
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 09:30:38AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:> On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 12:17:46PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 10:11:49AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > A straight-forward conversion. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------ > > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > The changes for vsock part LGTM: > > > > Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare at redhat.com> > > > > > > I also did some tests with vhost-vsock (tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test > > and iperf-vsock), so for vsock: > > > > Tested-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare at redhat.com> > > > > Thanks, > > Stefano > > Re-testing v6 would be very much appreciated.Sure, I'm building v6 now and I'll send you a feedback :-) Stefano> > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c > > > index a483cec31d5c..61c6d3dd2ae3 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c > > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c > > > @@ -103,7 +103,8 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, > > > unsigned out, in; > > > size_t nbytes; > > > size_t iov_len, payload_len; > > > - int head; > > > + struct vhost_buf buf; > > > + int ret; > > > > > > spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); > > > if (list_empty(&vsock->send_pkt_list)) { > > > @@ -117,16 +118,17 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, > > > list_del_init(&pkt->list); > > > spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); > > > > > > - head = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), > > > - &out, &in, NULL, NULL); > > > - if (head < 0) { > > > + ret = vhost_get_avail_buf(vq, &buf, > > > + vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), > > > + &out, &in, NULL, NULL); > > > + if (ret < 0) { > > > spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); > > > list_add(&pkt->list, &vsock->send_pkt_list); > > > spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); > > > break; > > > } > > > > > > - if (head == vq->num) { > > > + if (!ret) { > > > spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); > > > list_add(&pkt->list, &vsock->send_pkt_list); > > > spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); > > > @@ -186,7 +188,8 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, > > > */ > > > virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt(pkt); > > > > > > - vhost_add_used(vq, head, sizeof(pkt->hdr) + payload_len); > > > + buf.in_len = sizeof(pkt->hdr) + payload_len; > > > + vhost_put_used_buf(vq, &buf); > > > added = true; > > > > > > pkt->off += payload_len; > > > @@ -440,7 +443,8 @@ static void vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work) > > > struct vhost_vsock *vsock = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_vsock, > > > dev); > > > struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt; > > > - int head, pkts = 0, total_len = 0; > > > + int ret, pkts = 0, total_len = 0; > > > + struct vhost_buf buf; > > > unsigned int out, in; > > > bool added = false; > > > > > > @@ -461,12 +465,13 @@ static void vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work) > > > goto no_more_replies; > > > } > > > > > > - head = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), > > > - &out, &in, NULL, NULL); > > > - if (head < 0) > > > + ret = vhost_get_avail_buf(vq, &buf, > > > + vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), > > > + &out, &in, NULL, NULL); > > > + if (ret < 0) > > > break; > > > > > > - if (head == vq->num) { > > > + if (!ret) { > > > if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq))) { > > > vhost_disable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq); > > > continue; > > > @@ -494,7 +499,8 @@ static void vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work) > > > virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt); > > > > > > len += sizeof(pkt->hdr); > > > - vhost_add_used(vq, head, len); > > > + buf.in_len = len; > > > + vhost_put_used_buf(vq, &buf); > > > total_len += len; > > > added = true; > > > } while(likely(!vhost_exceeds_weight(vq, ++pkts, total_len))); > > > -- > > > MST > > > >
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [PATCH RFC v5 12/13] vhost/vsock: switch to the buf API
- [PATCH RFC v6 10/11] vhost/vsock: switch to the buf API
- [PATCH RFC v5 12/13] vhost/vsock: switch to the buf API
- [PATCH RFC v5 12/13] vhost/vsock: switch to the buf API
- [PATCH RFC 12/13] vhost/vsock: switch to the buf API