search for: nnelson

Hello everyone, We're a little bit behind schedule, but RC1 is now here. It was tagged earlier today as llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/11.0.0/#rc1 and https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/tag/llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1 Pre-built binaries will be added as they become available. Please file bug reports for any issues you find as

...Testing: 0 .. 10.. 20. > FAIL: Clang Tools :: clang-tidy/run-clang-tidy.cpp (17057 of 64198) > ******************** TEST 'Clang Tools :: > clang-tidy/run-clang-tidy.cpp' FAILED ******************** > Script: > -- > : 'RUN: at line 1';   /usr/bin/python > /home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc4/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/test/../test/../clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py > --help > : 'RUN: at line 2';   rm -rf > /home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc4/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-9.0.0-rc4.obj/too...

...a2b573b69a4c3d62d7a4accd9b164044cd5e8fbe68b056716c72cd0f81a134d > > FAIL: LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/asm-modifier.ll (37548 of 69923) > ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/asm-modifier.ll' FAILED ******************** > Script: > -- > : 'RUN: at line 1'; /home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc3/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-10.0.1-rc3.obj/bin/llc < /home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc3/llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/asm-modifier.ll -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown | /home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/...

Thanks! I'll get this posted on the web site. The "Performing Test ... failed to compile" failures from cmake are not interesting. But could you look in the log file and try to see what were the tests that failed in the "check-all" step? On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:39 PM Neil Nelson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Xubuntu/Ubuntu 19.04,

Hello everyone, It took a bit longer than planned due to master being a somewhat unstable at the branch point, but Release Candidate 1 has now been tagged as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/10.0.0/#rc1 Pre-built binaries will be added there as they become available. Please file bug reports for any issues you find as blockers of

Hi, I've tagged LLVM 10.0.1-rc3. This will hopefully be the last release candidate, please test it out and report results on this thread. Thanks, Tom

Hi, I've tagged 10.0.1-final. Testers, please begin uploading your binaries. Thanks, Tom

Hi, I've tagged the 10.0.1-rc2 release, please test the release and report any issues. Thanks, Tom

Hi, I've tagged the 8.0.1-rc4 release, please begin testing. This will (hopefully) be the last release candidate. If all goes well, I will tag the final release next Wednesday. -Tom

Hello again, I had hoped that rc4 would be the last one, but I wanted to pick up one more fix, so here we go. Release Candidate 5 was just tagged as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5 on the release branch at 35627038123. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/10.0.0/#rc5 and https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/tag/llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5 If nothing new comes up, I plan to tag

cmake -G Ninja -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS="debuginfo-tests" -DLLVM_USE_LINKER=lld -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="Release" -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=X86 -Wno-dev ../llvm &> ../../cmake.log in cmake.log -- Targeting X86 CMake Error at /home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/debuginfo-tests/CMakeLists.txt:30 (message):   Cannot run debuginfo-tests without python 3 installed python3 --version Python 3.7.5 python --version Python 2.7.17 in llvm-project/debuginfo-tests/CMakeLists.txt elseif(PYTHON_VERSION_MAJOR LESS 3)   message(FATAL_ERROR &q...

...dencies (but I don’t really know anything about ninja). Maybe this may help somebody to figure out what could be happening and hopefully help me to narrow the issue? I honestly am totally lost on what to try next. This is kind of ridiculous. Thanks > On 6 Jul 2019, at 23:49, Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com> wrote: > > Joan, > > Just completed a good clang compile built from a mostly vanilla Xubuntu 19.04 VM, installed the llvm-needed Ubuntu packages, downloaded a new copy of llvm using the noted llvm install page, configured using > > cmake -G Ninja -DLLVM_ENAB...

...ody to figure out what could be happening and >>> hopefully help me to narrow the issue? I honestly am totally lost on what >>> to try next. This is kind of ridiculous. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> On 6 Jul 2019, at 23:49, Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com> wrote: >>> >>> Joan, >>> >>> Just completed a good clang compile built from a mostly vanilla Xubuntu >>> 19.04 VM, installed the llvm-needed Ubuntu packages, downloaded a new copy >>> of llvm using the noted llvm install page...

...t could be happening and hopefully help me to narrow the issue? I honestly am totally lost on what to try next. This is kind of ridiculous. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 6 Jul 2019, at 23:49, Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com <mailto:nnelson at infowest.com>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Joan, >>>>>> >>>>>> Just completed a good clang compile built from a mostly vanilla Xubuntu 19.04 VM, installed the llvm-needed Ubuntu packages,...

...ything about ninja). > > Maybe this may help somebody to figure out what could be happening and > hopefully help me to narrow the issue? I honestly am totally lost on what > to try next. This is kind of ridiculous. > > Thanks > > > On 6 Jul 2019, at 23:49, Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com> wrote: > > Joan, > > Just completed a good clang compile built from a mostly vanilla Xubuntu > 19.04 VM, installed the llvm-needed Ubuntu packages, downloaded a new copy > of llvm using the noted llvm install page, configured using > > cmake -G Ninja -DLL...

...14*0.1532 seconds. cmake -G Ninja -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS="clang;llvm" -DLLVM_USE_LINKER=lld -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="Release" -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=X86 -DLLVM_ENABLE_LIBPFM=OFF -DRUN_HAVE_GNU_POSIX_REGEX=0 -DRUN_HAVE_THREAD_SAFETY_ATTRIBUTES=0 -Wno-dev ../llvm &> /home/nnelson/Documents/cmake.log ninja &> /home/nnelson/Documents/ninja.log Here are some useful pages from Threading Building Blocks. Task-Based Programming https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/506100 Appendix A Costs of Time Slicing https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/506127 The point When the...

...t; Maybe this may help somebody to figure out what could be happening and >> hopefully help me to narrow the issue? I honestly am totally lost on what >> to try next. This is kind of ridiculous. >> >> Thanks >> >> >> On 6 Jul 2019, at 23:49, Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com> wrote: >> >> Joan, >> >> Just completed a good clang compile built from a mostly vanilla Xubuntu >> 19.04 VM, installed the llvm-needed Ubuntu packages, downloaded a new copy >> of llvm using the noted llvm install page, configured using >&...

...arameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-noexcept-type -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wstring-conversion -fdiagnostics-color -g -Wl,-allow-shlib-undefined -Wl,-rpath-link,/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/build/./lib tools/llvm-lto/CMakeFiles/llvm-lto.dir/llvm-lto.cpp.o  -o bin/llvm-lto  -Wl,-rpath,"\$ORIGIN/../lib" lib/libLLVMAArch64AsmParser.a lib/libLLVMAMDGPUAsmParser.a lib/libLLVMARMAsmParser.a lib/libLLVMBPFAsmParser.a lib/libLLVMHexagonAsmParser.a lib/lib...

...a release of LLVM, likely obtained in binary form. If you have an objection to the LLVM trunk requiring CMake 3.15.0 in order to build I'd like to understand that objection so that we can take it into account as we move forward. Thanks, -Chris > On Nov 4, 2019, at 7:23 AM, Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com> wrote: > > Here is how I would make the argument for the latest version of cmake. > > The latest version of cmake addresses a number issues we face in building LLVM including the following. > > [list the justifications] > > We realize this using of th...

I run matrix multiplication code with both the approaches o3 at clang and o3 at opt. clang o3 is about 2.97x faster than opt o3. On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 8:24 AM Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com> wrote: > is_sorted.cpp > bool is_sorted(int *a, int n) { > > for (int i = 0; i < n - 1; i++) > > if (a[i] > a[i + 1]) > return false; > return true; > } > > https://blog.regehr.org/archives/1605 How Clang Compiles a Functionh...