search for: nmus

Hi Kurt, On 25 April 2024 at 08:07, Kurt Hornik wrote: | >>>>> Herv? Pag?s writes: | | > Hi Kurt, | > Is it intended that numeric_version() returns an error by default on | > non-character input in R 4.4.0? | | Dear Herve, yes, that's the intention. | | > It seems that I can turn this into a warning by setting | >

I was trying to merge the Debian unstable packaging files with the NUT trunk, and I noticed a bit of a problem with the automake changes. For the uninitiated, the 'debian/rules' file is essentially a Makefile that is used to build the package and split things into the sub-packages. If you look at line 85 of this copy of the rules file:

tags 490409 + patch thanks Hi, The following is the diff for my xen-3 3.2.1-2.1 NMU. It incorporates three patches from upstream and aims to fix CVE-2008-2004 aka #490409. It is not yet tested much, I would appreciate if interested parties could give it a try. I'll upload in due course. Kind regards T. diff -u xen-3-3.2.1/debian/control.md5sum xen-3-3.2.1/debian/control.md5sum ---

I've just been trying to catch up with the posts already so figured I'd just start another thread as it seemed I would address things from multiple emails. I really need to get my sieve filter script updated to move the list emails into the proper folder now I guess :) We can play with the revision of the packaging during testing. One idea would be to use 3.0.1-0.YYYYMMDD for

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.10 Severity: serious User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, blktap-dkms fails to build a module for Linux 4.12: Selecting previously unselected package blktap-dkms. (Reading database ... 34976 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../blktap-dkms_2.0.93-0.10_amd64.deb ... Unpacking blktap-dkms (2.0.93-0.10) ...