search for: nmbd_namequeri

Hello all, I'm running samba 2.2.4 on Sun Solaris version Sunos 5.8 generic_108528-17, Samba version 2.2.4 I'm getting this error in my /var/adm/messages and don't know what it means, I suspect it is also responsible for causing the delays in the application running from the shares. Jun 8 14:53:53 krypton nmbd[3096]: [ID 702911 daemon.error] query_name_response: Multiple (2)

Our log.nmb file fills up very quickly with the following pattern of messages: [2000/06/19 05:10:59, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name_response(93) query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 129.130.10.136 for name NT.CIS.KSU.EDU<1d>. This response was from IP 129.130.10.24 [2000/06/19 05:10:59, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name_response(93)

This is a repost with some new information: Our log.nmb file fills up very quickly with the following pattern of messages: [2000/06/22 11:58:25, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name_response(93) query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 129.130.10.136 for name NT.CIS.KSU.EDU<1d>. This response was from IP 129.130.10.24 [2000/06/22 11:58:25, 0]

Thanks for the replys... Just a basic samba server...being accessed by windows 7 to the gc and tmr shares with \\10.10.171.9\gc and \\10.10.171.9\tmr This has been running for a year without any issues...till the update yesterday afternoon :-( The file server is Ubuntu 18.04 and there was an update to Ubuntu 18.04.1, which I thought would be a mild step. The current version of samba is...

Samba 4.8.9 FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE-p3 / amd64 Since updating both FreeBSD and Samba, I have been getting the following screen pop-ups incessantly. They are always the same except for the time. IP 102.168.0.102 is a Win10 PRO / amd64 machine. I never received any warnings before updating. <quot> Mar 19 08:23:58 scorpio nmbd[11202]: [2019/03/19 08:23:58.049153, 0]

I admit theres a LOT about the windows networking I dont understand - and even though this may NOT be a SAMBA issue per se, I thought I'd post it here. Have a 400gb samba server thats been working well (am upgrading to current patches today, btw). I've got 3 Win2k workstations, on two subnets, that have drives mapped, and connect every morning on startup just fine. All the machines

Robert Dal Santo wrote: > Is there any work underway to get Samba to support OPLOCKS? I know > they are difficult to implement but I'm faced with a decisions now to buy an > NT box (Ugh!) or do a lot of messing around to get this application > to perform decently. The application in questions takes around 5 > hours to do a taks without OPLOCKS and around an hour to do the

I am getting a recurring error written to the consol of my Solaris 7 system running Samba. It would be a great help if someone knows what may be causing this. [2001/09/26 08:50:25, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:(93) query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 10.0.0.48 for name HRC<1d>. This response was from IP 10.0.0.81 [2001/09/26 09:25:25, 0]

SEND: Teoman TURHAN Hi teams. I installed samba 2.0.9 on Alpha server TRU64 unix 4.0F. But I cannot configure --with-dfs because this Tru64 unix was installing chosed filesystem type UFS filesystem. but I used ./configure command and make and make install. I installed ADVFS file system 2 days ago samba 2.2.2 on TRU64 unix. but I don't live a problem. all services were running. UFS BUG

Hello, Don't know what happened, but Samba stopped serving up shares. Top shows 'smbd' using 66% of the cpu and 'rpc.mountd' using 33%. The samba log on shows; [2006/01/19 16:34:54, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(668) Netbios nameserver version 3.0.13-1.1-SUSE started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1994-2004 [2006/01/19 16:40:03, 0]

I have a server which we use for backing up files. Noticed there was an upgrade available to 18.04.1. Now I cannot connect to from my win7 machine to the Ubuntu share. Any thoughts on what would have changed??? Tom

I'm trying to diagnose why my windows 10 clients can't do network browsing. The network neighborhood doesn't show any of my machines running samba. I've verified that all of my samba hosts are running nmbd! I've reached the end of my ability to debug this, so I could really use some help from the list to figure out why this isn't working. I've isolated the situation

Hi, I have joined a RedHat-7.1 box with Samba 2.2.2 to a NT Domain, and everything works perfect. Except when I look in de log file I see a name query error every 5 minutes , and I don't know how to solve this problem. The PDC-A is de primary domain controller and tux is the linux box with samba. I made u tcpdump on the same moment when I receive the error and it seems that the NT box sends

SMBv1 (the anonymous thing behind network neighborhood) because of the massive security problems it caused was decprecated. Microsoft came up with network neighborhood and they've shut it down due to their bad implementation. Samba, likewise, doesn't support SMBv1 by default. On 7/12/20 10:29 PM, Michael Jones via samba wrote: > I'm trying to diagnose why my windows 10 clients

On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 13:02:40 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba stated: >On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 12:37:08 +0000 >Gerard Seibert via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Samba 4.8.9 >> FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE-p3 / amd64 >> >> Since updating both FreeBSD and Samba, I have been getting the >> following screen pop-ups incessantly. They are always the same

If you have 1 member server, you could enabe nmbd in that server. Or install : llmnrd on linux and/or avahi-deamon if you dont have a member. And make sure you can use "proxy dns" as in, The primary DNS domain on linux should match (see in windows) CMD: ipconfig /all The : - primay dns suffix - DNS Suffix search order Then you are able to use \\hostname or \\hostname.FQ.DN.TLD

The only thing related to 'addresses' in my /etc/samba/smb.conf file is a "hosts allow": hosts allow = 192.168.3.0/24 127.1 I'm going to ignore the 'local hosts case, as if I solve the other, the localhost case may get solved by inference. I thought the 'hosts allow' would allow any host on the local 192.168.3.0/24 subnet. The hosts have no problems

Looking for a solution to this problem. I have Googled all over the place but haven't found a definitive answer. I have a Samba Server that ONCE was on a network where there was SECOND Samba Server with IP Address 192.168.20.3. Today, the FIRST server is on a network with an address range 10.0.0.0/255.255.255.0 and it has no way of finding that SECOND Server 192.168.20.3. However,

A reasonable alternative is to run Christgau's excellent Web Service Discovery host daemon (wsdd) on the samba server and make sure the Function Discovery Provider Host and Function Discovery Resource Publication services are running on the Windows 10 machines. Get wsdd from here: https://github.com/christgau/wsdd.git You can then stop and disable the nmbd on the samba machines as it's

Am Do 01.02.2018 um 12:04 schrieb Martin Schwenke: > Hi Nicolas, > > On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 10:57:59 +0100, Nicolas Zuber via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I try to update two clustered samba file servers. Right now samba 4.7.0 >> with ctdb is running on both of them. To update samba I stopped ctdb on >> one of the servers, and compiled and