search for: nixs

I am trying to make Qemu agent work with libvirt thanks to https://github.com/NixOS/nixops/pull/922 with libvirt 4.1.0. I've been trying to make it work for quite some time but I still haven't the slightest idea of what is wrong, I keep seeing "Guest agent is not responding: QEMU guest agent is not connected" as the program I use (nixops) calls the libvirt python API. I

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 07:54:14PM +0900, Matt wrote: > I am trying to make Qemu agent work with libvirt thanks to > https://github.com/NixOS/nixops/pull/922 with libvirt 4.1.0. I've been > trying to make it work for quite some time but I still haven't the > slightest idea of what is wrong, I keep seeing "Guest agent is not > responding: QEMU guest agent is not

>From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 19:43:34 -0700 > >OK, I stand corrected: mingw can be used to create honest-to-goodness >Windows applications using Win32. But you're still using it as a Unix >emulator :) > OK, if POSIX.1 is unix emulation then we have that all *nix emulates all *nix and that's fine with me :) OK, I admit,

Hi, This code path is only executed when there is a return-path header. Given the fact that this fails consistently, can you provide an example of a message successfully delivered using an older version of Dovecot; i.e., as it is stored in the mailbox? There should be a return-path header there. Alternatively, you could temporarily wrap dovecot-lda in a shell script that copies the message

Op 12-4-2018 om 15:52 schreef Leo Gaspard: > Here are the first two headers of the mail you just sent, delivered with > the rolled-back-into dovecot 2.3.0.1: > > Return-Path: stephan at rename-it.nl > Delivered-To: dovecot at leo.gaspard.io > > Does that clear the facts? The Return-Path appears to not have <>, which > appears to be opposed to RFC5322. So I guess

Hi all, I'm hitting a segfault in llc when trying to build GHC: http://sprunge.us/ZVGB. What is the best way to debug this? I'm able to bump to 3.8.1 if needed, but GHC tends to break when updating major versions due to IR incompatibilities. Thanks, Shea -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size:

Here is LLVM IR code: https://gist.github.com/andrewrk/041af662b3ff515cd0be64ab85c112d7 That produces the following valgrind message: $ valgrind llc -filetype=obj bug.ll ==27195== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==27195== at 0x56A0917: (anonymous namespace)::LiveDebugValues::transferDebugValue(llvm::MachineInstr const&, (anonymous

I am a Windows admin looking to make the switch to the BSD/*nix side of the house. I am currently working nights (Sun-Thu, 10PM-6AM) but am looking for an enty level BSD/*nix position during the day. I am able to work both jobs(already have done so for over 9 months), as long as there is no night or on-call responsibility. Goal is to get feet wet and prove myself and then make the switch to

hello everybody, i have a slight problem, i want to write a wrapper around win32 binary dll and use it with my *nix applications, and i have been through the winelib documentation, and spent pretty much time trying to make a working wrapper, but i can't seem to get it working (with and without prototyping the calls i seem to get many "undefined reference to '....'"'s)...

I posted this to comp.protocols.smb, but I'll give it a shot here too... Background : We have an existing Win2k domain, 2 Win2k domain controllers, all working just fine. I've been using Samba 2.2.x for quite a while to provide access to specific folders on *nix machines using Domain security...So I'm reasonably familiar with how file/print sharing works. But what I'm

I'm a bit confused on several points of the security infrastructure of Samba. First, and simplest, why (and is it necessary) do we need to keep a smbpasswd file when the Linux/Unix passwd file could be suffice? I like the idea of mapping particular users to a given UNIX account via the username map option, but I see no reason in specifying a separate password file for these same UNIX users.

I''m considering using wxRuby in a project, but the installation procedure seems to be pretty complicated. Can you tell me what users would have to do to use a wxRuby application on *NIX and Windows, assuming that Ruby itself is already available? >From what I understand, Windows users would just have to download the wxRuby distro, which contains everything needed to make it work.

I found a fix! The first hunk of https://reviews.llvm.org/D17533 (lib/CodeGen/TargetFrameLoweringImpl.cpp) on top of 3.8.1 does the trick. Does llvm do patch releases of old versions? Davide Italiano <davide at freebsd.org> writes: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Shea Levy via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm hitting

Dear R experts, I hope everyone has had a happy easter break. Recently my work included writing R function that need to call external tools. I did this using R's system function for example: system( paste( 'tool', '-input', path_to_input, '-output', path_to_output, '-other_switch', some_val ) ) I have two question about this: 1) Is there a way to implement

Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:49:21 +0900 (JST) From: Steve Frampton <frampton@j-com.co.jp> To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA <samba@samba.org> Subject: PC Virus scanning on *nix side? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0003311046390.7302-100000@firewall.j-com.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi:

The story: I have wine-20010216 with Starcraft installed from within wine. All works well, except, sometimes, in the middle of the game (running as root to get DGA), the mouse and keyboard stop responding altogether, 30 seconds after which the game stops moving (the display freezes altogether). I cannot do anything, not even switch to another tty. My only course is to ssh into the box from

To follow up this bug report: When you run mongrel_rails without the daemonize option -d on *nix, it also don''t generate log/mongrel.log file! Because win32 cannot Process.fork like *nix, should it start logging to logfile after showing Ctrl+C option? Suggestions are welcome on how to reply to this "feature". -- Luis Lavena Multimedia systems - Leaders are made, they are

Hi, I have configured samba PDC and BDC servers with ldap backend (debian). All users home directories and shares are on Samba member server (opensolaris). everything works fine except fact that on windows i can't see permissions on folders. On files permissions are displayed correctly. if I tick permissions on folders in windows space they disapper after clicking "apply" but

Please forgive any mis-post, and do feel free to point me to a more appropriate list if this isn't properly R-dev. I have a package on R-forge that shows correct linux and other *nix builds, but no windows build. The log for the patched version shows the error below, which appears to be due to a lack of /src files, a problem that does not halt the *nix builds. The package contains no

> From: Chuck Kollars <ckollars9 <at> yahoo.com> > Subject: Samba & ACLs? > Date: 2006-08-19 02:46:45 GMT > How exactly do Samba 3.x and ACLs interrelate? ... > I started out naively assuming that the *nix > uidNumber/gidNumber Samba mapped the end user to > would behave exactly the same whether they were a > Samba user or were logged on locally. ...