Hi,
This code path is only executed when there is a return-path header.
Given the fact that this fails consistently, can you provide an example
of a message successfully delivered using an older version of Dovecot;
i.e., as it is stored in the mailbox? There should be a return-path
header there.
Alternatively, you could temporarily wrap dovecot-lda in a shell script
that copies the message to some file you can read after.
I just need one example to confirm my suspicions.
Regards,
Stephan.
Op 12-4-2018 om 11:54 schreef Leo Gaspard:> (sorry for the absence of In-Reply-To, I could neither find it on the ML
> interface nor figure out a way to customize it in Thunderbird, and am
> not subscribed)
>
> Just wanted to chime in to say I've hit the same issue with the upgrade
> from 2.3.0.1 to 2.3.1. My setup is an opensmtpd sending mail to rspamd,
> that then delivers to dovecot LDA.
>
> In the logs, I see (slightly reformated and censored):
>
> Panic: file message-address.c: line 147 (parse_angle_addr): assertion
> failed: (*ctx->parser.data == '<')
> Error: Raw backtrace:
> /nix/store/[?]-dovecot-2.3.1/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+[?]) [?]
> -> /nix/store/[?]-dovecot-2.3.1/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+[?]) [?]
> -> /nix/store/[?]-dovecot-2.3.1/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(i_fatal+0)
[?]
> -> /nix/store/[?]-dovecot-2.3.1/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+[?]) [?]
> -> /nix/store/[?]-dovecot-2.3.1/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+[?]) [?]
> ->
>
/nix/store/[?]-dovecot-2.3.1/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(message_address_parse_path+[?])
> [?]
> ->
>
/nix/store/[?]-dovecot-2.3.1/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-lda.so.0(mail_deliver_get_return_address+[?])
> [?]
> -> /etc/dovecot/modules/lib90_sieve_plugin.so(+[?]) [?]
> ->
>
/nix/store/[?]-dovecot-2.3.1/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-lda.so.0(mail_deliver+[?])
> [0x7f04e2d08e20]
> -> /nix/store/[?]-dovecot-2.3.1/libexec/dovecot/deliver(main+[?]) [?]
> -> /nix/store/[?]-glibc-2.26-131/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+[?])
[?]
> -> /nix/store/[?]-dovecot-2.3.1/libexec/dovecot/deliver(_start+[?])
[?]
>
> For some reason there are not many symbols, but hope that helps!
