search for: nitpicks

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 385 matches for "nitpicks".

Did you mean: nitpick
2007 Feb 05
2
Nitpicking: rc21 startup banner says rc19
> [jhg at helios RPMS]$ rpm -q dovecot > dovecot-1.0-1_42.rc21.fc5.at but: > dovecot: Feb 05 10:49:21 Info: Dovecot v1.0.rc19 starting up
2007 Nov 13
1
nitpicking :)
The http://merbivore.com/get_merb.html#trunk page mentions the 0.4.0 version, but 0.4.1 is out. Is this a part of the site which will be constantly updated as part of the release cycle? The roadmap on merb.devjavu.com has outstanding tickets for 0.4.0 and 0.4.1, yet both versions are out. Were those issues fixed, or should they be bumped forward? Yeah, this is really anal crap, I know. I would
2000 Jul 10
0
Minor nitpick on openssh: man pages
On a plain vanilla Solaris 8 install, the man page source WILL NOT generate readable manpages. It just ends up as one big paragraph. I've been using the cat pages as a workaround, but it would be nice if the man pages would format with nroff -man --jeh Asst. Systems Administrator Research Computing Systems UW Electrical Engineering
2007 Mar 18
1
Encoding and Compression --- where is the nitpick?
Greetings, I'm playing aroung with the library and try to encode some PCM samples out of a WAVE file. I recognized that my own encoding is bigger than the encoding with the command line tool and I can't figure out why it is so. I tried some API functions to get a better result but I missed. minimal test code: http://stinfwww.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/~mai02cal/test.c example wav:
2005 Jul 16
1
Re: CentOS Digest, Vol 6, Issue 16
> This is also answer to everybody else who was nitpicking... > > I believe that OP ment a GUI front end when he said "no package > manager". If he's running CentOS, then he has rpm installed, and most > of his system (if not everything) was installed by rpm. I fail to > understand why so many people are trying to be smart, instead of being > helpfull.
2005 Mar 08
5
removing message: [Previously saved workspace restored]
Dear All, I saved by mistake the environment I was working in after typing q(), and now I get the annoying message: [Previously saved workspace restored] I have already deleted all the objects in the environment, saving it as an empty environment, so it's just a matter of nitpicking I suppose. The message does not appear if I start R from any other place in the directory tree. I am
2014 Dec 15
3
Fwd: [CentOS Wiki] Update of "HowTos/Custom Kernel" by AkemiYagi
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: <noreply at centos.org> > Date: Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:31 PM > Subject: [CentOS Wiki] Update of "HowTos/Custom Kernel" by AkemiYagi > To: noreply at centos.org > > Dear Wiki user, > > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "CentOS Wiki" for change notification. > > The
2019 Jun 11
3
[nbdkit PATCH 0/2] Few rust plugin fixups/nitpicks
There are few more things that could be cleaned up related to the coding style and other things, like explicitly specifying the abi style after "extern" (i.e. `extern "C" fn` instead of `extern fn`), but since those are configurable in rustfmt config, I'm not sure whether the config needs to be added or complying with the defaults should be the priority. But this was just
2009 Jan 08
2
[LLVMdev] insertAfter method Patch
John Criswell wrote: > Small nitpick: in Instruction.cpp, the comment for insertAfter says > insertBefore and not insertAfter. > :) > > -- John T. > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > Thanks for spotting
2002 Jun 10
2
RPM version/release
Minor nitpick maybe, but normally the release part of an RPM name is used only for RPM specific changes, e.g. if the RPM maintainer made changes to the packaging or patches applied. (name-ver-rel-arch.rpm) So, shorewall-1.3-0.noarch.rpm would normally be shorewall-1.3.0-0.noarch.rpm ..and the second attempt of getting the RPM packaging right would be shorewall-1.3.0-1.noarch.rpm ..next
2008 Jun 10
2
[PATCH] Do not calculate linear rip in emulation failure report
If we're not gonna do anything (case in which failure is already reported), we do not need to even bother with calculating the linear rip. This is a nitpick, but I saw it while doing some testing, so here's the patch. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta at redhat.com> --- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git
2008 Jun 10
2
[PATCH] Do not calculate linear rip in emulation failure report
If we're not gonna do anything (case in which failure is already reported), we do not need to even bother with calculating the linear rip. This is a nitpick, but I saw it while doing some testing, so here's the patch. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta at redhat.com> --- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git
1998 Jul 30
0
R-beta: feedback R-0.62.2
Rashid Nassar <rnassar@acpub.duke.edu> writes: > I have one more nitpick, if I may: > > summary(aov.obj) prints significance *'s but doesn't print the legend > at the bottom explaining their meaning (it is not parallel with > summary(lm.obj) > > > Question: Is this kind of nitpicking feedback useful (if so I'd be > glad to continue to keep notes and
2010 Apr 07
1
Small memory leak in CELT
Hi Jean-Marc, I hate to nitpick, but perhaps "logN" should be freed somewhere in celt_mode_destroy. Cheers, John Ridges
2006 Mar 06
5
Mongrel 0.3.9 -- GemPlugin Based
Hello everyone, Mongrel now has plugins that are based entirely on RubyGems. This feature was so slick that I decided to bust it out into a separate project called GemPlugin (more on that later). What the new plugin system does is makes it so that people can distribute Mongrel plugins as just plain gems, and mongrel will load them on the fly if people install them. There''s no
2013 Jul 23
0
[LLVMdev] -Os
On Jul 23, 2013, at 5:22 AM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > On 07/23/2013 05:19 AM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >> >> 23.07.2013, 16:05, "reed kotler" <rkotler at mips.com>: >>> When I use -Os with a clang that implicitly calls llc, I get much >>> different code than when call clang first with -Os and then call llc. >> clang
2008 May 05
2
axis and tick widths decoupled (especially in rugs!)
Hi! (a complete newby, but will not give up easily!) I was wondering if there is any way to decouple the axis and tick mark widths? As I understand they are both controlled by the lwd setting, and cannot be controlled independently? For example I might want to create major and minor ticks, which I now know how to do by superimposing two axes with different at settings, but what if I also wanted
2016 Sep 16
2
[PATCH 2/3] drm/nouveau/led: guard against a division by 0
Reviewed-by: Karol Herbst <karolherbst at gmail.com> 2016-09-16 9:34 GMT+02:00 Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr>: > Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> > --- > drm/nouveau/nouveau_led.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_led.c b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_led.c > index
2017 Mar 05
2
Missing security tab samba 4.1.13
On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 16:04:10 +0100 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > as you currently don't have a working as desired setup i would start > from scratch because you can't distinct between probably upgrade > related problems and others in your current state The OP does have a working setup, it just isn't working as he expected, probably because
2013 Jul 23
3
[LLVMdev] -Os
On 07/23/2013 05:19 AM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > 23.07.2013, 16:05, "reed kotler" <rkotler at mips.com>: >> When I use -Os with a clang that implicitly calls llc, I get much >> different code than when call clang first with -Os and then call llc. > clang does NOT call llc internally. I understand. It's invoking that functionality is what I meant to say