Rashid Nassar <rnassar@acpub.duke.edu> writes:
> I have one more nitpick, if I may:
>
> summary(aov.obj) prints significance *'s but doesn't print the
legend
> at the bottom explaining their meaning (it is not parallel with
> summary(lm.obj)
>
>
> Question: Is this kind of nitpicking feedback useful (if so I'd be
> glad to continue to keep notes and send them as I'm using/playing with
> R, and please there is no need for you to answer or give workarounds,
> since none of this really prevents getting results)? Or does it just
> get in the way of more important stuff (in which case I'll quite the
> nitpicking and only report if I get a real problem)?
In general, it is useful. It's especially the smaller things that we
tend to overlook. The best place to send them is the R-devel list,
though - if you send them to a single person they may get lost. E.g.
significance stars are really Martin Maechlers pet. (I'll Cc: this
particular note to R-devel).
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To:
r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
