search for: nexgo

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 35 matches for "nexgo".

2018 Dec 05
4
Where's the optimiser gone? (part 5.a): missed tail calls, and more...
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:58 PM Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Dec 4, 2018, at 15:11, Stefan Kanthak <stefan.kanthak at nexgo.de> wrote: > No, I understand his intent. I just doesn't align with my intent, > including the hoops he/LLVM wants me to jump through. > > He's not saying they're your bugs, he's just saying they need > to be reported in the correct place. > > > Go ahead,...
2020 Aug 23
2
Apropos "shouting": PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING FILES TO THE BUG REPORT
...tps://llvm.org/docs/Contributing.html LLVM also have code of conduct : https://llvm.org/docs/CodeOfConduct.html On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 at 23:28, David Blaikie via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 10:54 AM Stefan Kanthak <stefan.kanthak at nexgo.de> > wrote: > >> "David Blaikie" <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Context is everything. >> >> I'm willing to accept your humble apologies. >> > > Sarcasm and snark are not appreciated. Your repeated interest in > a...
2020 Aug 23
2
Apropos "shouting": PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING FILES TO THE BUG REPORT
...c msg: C:\Windows\Temp\crash-74a40f.sh >> clang: note: diagnostic msg: >> >> ******************** >> >> --- crash-74a40f.c --- >> # 1 "<built-in>" >> # 1 "crash.c" >> // Copyright (C) 2020 Stefan Kanthak <stefan.kanthak at nexgo.de> >> >> long dummy; >> >> __attribute__((naked)) >> long function(void) >> { >> __asm__(".data\n" >> "dummy:\n" >> ".quad\t0\n" >> ".text\n" >>...
2020 Aug 23
3
Apropos "shouting": PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING FILES TO THE BUG REPORT
...diagnostic msg: C:\Windows\Temp\crash-74a40f.c clang: note: diagnostic msg: C:\Windows\Temp\crash-74a40f.sh clang: note: diagnostic msg: ******************** --- crash-74a40f.c --- # 1 "<built-in>" # 1 "crash.c" // Copyright (C) 2020 Stefan Kanthak <stefan.kanthak at nexgo.de> long dummy; __attribute__((naked)) long function(void) { __asm__(".data\n" "dummy:\n" ".quad\t0\n" ".text\n" ".intel_syntax noprefix\n" "\tmov\trax, dummy\n" &qu...
2020 Aug 30
5
BUG: complete misunterstanding of the MS-ABI
Objects compiled for the MS-ABI don't conform to it! Data types beyond 64 bit MUST BE returned by the callee via the hidden first argument allocated by the caller, NOT in XMM0! Demo/proof: from this source --- llvm-bug.c --- #ifndef __clang__ typedef struct { unsigned __int64 low; unsigned __int64 high; } __uint128_t; #else __attribute__((ms_abi)) #endif __uint128_t
2018 Dec 03
4
Where's the optimiser gone? (part 5.a): missed tail calls, and more...
"Tim Northover" <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 at 17:37, Stefan Kanthak via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Compile the following functions with "-O3 -target amd64" > > You've been advised before, but you really need to start reporting > these as bugs[*] if you actually care about
2018 Nov 28
2
Rather poor code optimisation of current clang/LLVM targeting Intel x86 (both -64 and -32)
...I'm one of the moderators there & any email sent there that doesn't come from the bug database will get automatically or manually rejected with the suggestion/request that the bug database is used instead. > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 4:37 PM Stefan Kanthak <stefan.kanthak at nexgo.de> > wrote: > >> "Sanjay Patel" <spatel at rotateright.com> wrote: >> >> > IIUC, you want to use x86-specific bit-hacks (sbb masking) in cases like >> > this: >> > unsigned int foo(unsigned int crc) { >> > if (crc & 0x...
2015 Jan 10
0
UDP/138 answers sending from false IP on multinetwork-server
...kages UDP/138 can't reach for the client. Hint: In another network in other buildings I have a simliary installation. In that nmbd sends to 127.0.0.1 and in tcpdump is seen the rigth sender-IP for each adapter. What can I do? with regards Andreas Matthus -- Andreas Matthus <matthus at nexgo.de> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 4847 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20150110/9aa369b5/attachment.bin>
2001 Jul 31
1
cant make folders?
running redhat 7.1 with wine 20010313 it seems to work okay but it just refuses to make folders. Im trying to install counter-strike but when i set the install directory and the program asks if i want to create it i click ok but nothing happens. if i make the directory myself everything goes fine, the files are copied and everything. all the permissions seem to be set correctly.. any help?
2001 Nov 09
1
Explorer with wine
Hi, I don't really know if it is the reason but when i tried tu run my explorer.exe with wine (without success) It removed all i had in 'Program Files' directory and added a folder 'Uninstall Information ...'. Does anyone know about it ... anyway it would be a warning. -- Omar
2002 Jan 29
1
Wine and damage of original MS Windows
...xplorer, for instance, if you don't have a proper backup, as it renames/cripples several directories sometimes. Not even other MS apps such as e.g. Messenger are safe, as they launch Explorer somehow. This particular corruption (!$!$!$!$.pfr) can at least partially be fixed by using http://home.nexgo.de/andi.mohr/download/decorrupt_explorer" ---- Do you have any idea how to protect original Windows without backup? Or is the backup the only solution in this time? Thanks for hints, Petr
2002 Feb 16
1
Newbie Trying To Get Ghost Recon To Install
Hello, I'm new to using WINE (and to these lists), so I apologize if this has been asked and answered already: Has anyone been able to get Ghost Recon to at least install? The autorun program came up just fine, but when I click the button to install, it promptly quits. I tried running the setup.exe program directly, and it gets as far as trying to setup and install shield wizard, and then
2018 Nov 26
2
BUGS in code generated for target i386-win32
"Tim Northover" <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 12:37, Stefan Kanthak via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> LLVM/clang generates wrong code for the following program >> (see <https://godbolt.org/z/UZrrkG>): > > It looks like all of these issues come down to mismatched
2004 Aug 06
2
[Bug] PCM file not recognized
Hi, I am using Speex to compress speech samples used for dictation. I am thrilled by the compression ratios Speex achieves with almost no loss in quality. However, I have come across a few files which Speex (I use the Windows variant) refuses to compress. I have put a sample file at http://leggewie.biz/test.wav. The error message I receive is "Unsupported WAVE file fmt chunk, not
2019 Aug 20
1
Slow XCHG in arch/i386/libgcc/__ashrdi3.S and arch/i386/libgcc/__lshrdi3.S
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> wrote August 20, 2019 12:51 AM: > On 8/14/19 9:42 PM, Stefan Kanthak wrote: >> Hi, >> >> both >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/klibc/klibc.git/plain/usr/klibc/arch/i386/libgcc/__ashldi3.S >> and >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/klibc/klibc.git/plain/usr/klibc/arch/i386/libgcc/__lshrdi3.S
2018 Nov 27
2
Rather poor code optimisation of current clang/LLVM targeting Intel x86 (both -64 and -32)
"Sanjay Patel" <spatel at rotateright.com> wrote: > IIUC, you want to use x86-specific bit-hacks (sbb masking) in cases like > this: > unsigned int foo(unsigned int crc) { > if (crc & 0x80000000) > crc <<= 1, crc ^= 0xEDB88320; > else > crc <<= 1; > return crc; > } To document this for x86 too: rewrite the function
2018 Nov 25
2
BUGS n code generated for target i386 compiling __bswapdi3, and for target x86-64 compiling __bswapsi2()
...5 pushl %ebp 1f71: 89 e5 movl %esp, %ebp 1f73: 8b 55 08 movl 8(%ebp), %edx 1f76: 8b 45 0c movl 12(%ebp), %eax 1f79: 0f c8 bswapl %eax 1f7b: 0f ca bswapl %edx 1f7d: 5d popl %ebp 1f7e: c3 retl ~Craig On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:39 AM Stefan Kanthak <stefan.kanthak at nexgo.de> wrote: > "Craig Topper" <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > > > bswapdi2 for i386 is correct > > OUCH! > > > Bits 31:0 of the source are loaded into edx. Bits 63:32 are loaded into > > eax. Those are each bswapped. > > This exchanges t...
2018 Nov 25
3
BUGS n code generated for target i386 compiling __bswapdi3, and for target x86-64 compiling __bswapsi2()
bswapdi2 for i386 is correct Bits 31:0 of the source are loaded into edx. Bits 63:32 are loaded into eax. Those are each bswapped. The ABI for the return is edx contains bits [63:32] and eax contains [31:0]. This is opposite of how the register were loaded. ~Craig On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:36 AM Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > bswapsi2 on the x86-64 isn't using
2018 Dec 03
3
The builtins library of compiler-rt is a performance HOG^WKILLER
"Craig Topper" <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > None of the "si" division routines will be used by x86. That was my expectation too. > They exist for targets that don't support the operations natively. > X86 supports them natively so will never use the library functions. So they SHOULD not be built (or at least not shipped) with the builtins library
2013 Mar 18
0
[linux-linus test] 17325: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
...> Philippe Rétornaz <philippe.retornaz@epfl.ch> Phillip Lougher <phillip@squashfs.org.uk> Phillip Susi <psusi@ubuntu.com> Pierangelo Terzulli <pierigno@gmail.com> Piergiorgio Beruto <piergiorgio.beruto@gmail.com> Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de> Pierre Carrier <pierre@spotify.com> Pierre Sauter <pierre.sauter@gmail.com> Pierre Tardy <pierre.tardy@intel.com> Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pelloux@gmail.com> Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Pierre-Loup A. Griffais <p...