Displaying 20 results from an estimated 35 matches for "nexgo".
2018 Dec 05
4
Where's the optimiser gone? (part 5.a): missed tail calls, and more...
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:58 PM Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2018, at 15:11, Stefan Kanthak <stefan.kanthak at nexgo.de> wrote:
> No, I understand his intent. I just doesn't align with my intent,
> including the hoops he/LLVM wants me to jump through.
>
> He's not saying they're your bugs, he's just saying they need
> to be reported in the correct place.
>
>
> Go ahead,...
2020 Aug 23
2
Apropos "shouting": PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING FILES TO THE BUG REPORT
...tps://llvm.org/docs/Contributing.html
LLVM also have code of conduct : https://llvm.org/docs/CodeOfConduct.html
On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 at 23:28, David Blaikie via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 10:54 AM Stefan Kanthak <stefan.kanthak at nexgo.de>
> wrote:
>
>> "David Blaikie" <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Context is everything.
>>
>> I'm willing to accept your humble apologies.
>>
>
> Sarcasm and snark are not appreciated. Your repeated interest in
> a...
2020 Aug 23
2
Apropos "shouting": PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING FILES TO THE BUG REPORT
...c msg: C:\Windows\Temp\crash-74a40f.sh
>> clang: note: diagnostic msg:
>>
>> ********************
>>
>> --- crash-74a40f.c ---
>> # 1 "<built-in>"
>> # 1 "crash.c"
>> // Copyright (C) 2020 Stefan Kanthak <stefan.kanthak at nexgo.de>
>>
>> long dummy;
>>
>> __attribute__((naked))
>> long function(void)
>> {
>> __asm__(".data\n"
>> "dummy:\n"
>> ".quad\t0\n"
>> ".text\n"
>>...
2020 Aug 23
3
Apropos "shouting": PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING FILES TO THE BUG REPORT
...diagnostic msg: C:\Windows\Temp\crash-74a40f.c
clang: note: diagnostic msg: C:\Windows\Temp\crash-74a40f.sh
clang: note: diagnostic msg:
********************
--- crash-74a40f.c ---
# 1 "<built-in>"
# 1 "crash.c"
// Copyright (C) 2020 Stefan Kanthak <stefan.kanthak at nexgo.de>
long dummy;
__attribute__((naked))
long function(void)
{
__asm__(".data\n"
"dummy:\n"
".quad\t0\n"
".text\n"
".intel_syntax noprefix\n"
"\tmov\trax, dummy\n"
&qu...
2020 Aug 30
5
BUG: complete misunterstanding of the MS-ABI
Objects compiled for the MS-ABI don't conform to it!
Data types beyond 64 bit MUST BE returned by the callee via the
hidden first argument allocated by the caller, NOT in XMM0!
Demo/proof: from this source
--- llvm-bug.c ---
#ifndef __clang__
typedef struct {
unsigned __int64 low;
unsigned __int64 high;
} __uint128_t;
#else
__attribute__((ms_abi))
#endif
__uint128_t
2018 Dec 03
4
Where's the optimiser gone? (part 5.a): missed tail calls, and more...
"Tim Northover" <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 at 17:37, Stefan Kanthak via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> Compile the following functions with "-O3 -target amd64"
>
> You've been advised before, but you really need to start reporting
> these as bugs[*] if you actually care about
2018 Nov 28
2
Rather poor code optimisation of current clang/LLVM targeting Intel x86 (both -64 and -32)
...I'm one of the
moderators there & any email sent there that doesn't come from the bug
database will get automatically or manually rejected with the
suggestion/request that the bug database is used instead.
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 4:37 PM Stefan Kanthak <stefan.kanthak at nexgo.de>
> wrote:
>
>> "Sanjay Patel" <spatel at rotateright.com> wrote:
>>
>> > IIUC, you want to use x86-specific bit-hacks (sbb masking) in cases like
>> > this:
>> > unsigned int foo(unsigned int crc) {
>> > if (crc & 0x...
2015 Jan 10
0
UDP/138 answers sending from false IP on multinetwork-server
...kages UDP/138 can't reach for the client.
Hint: In another network in other buildings I have a simliary
installation. In that nmbd sends to 127.0.0.1 and in tcpdump is seen the
rigth sender-IP for each adapter.
What can I do?
with regards
Andreas Matthus
--
Andreas Matthus <matthus at nexgo.de>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4847 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20150110/9aa369b5/attachment.bin>
2001 Jul 31
1
cant make folders?
running redhat 7.1 with wine 20010313 it seems to work okay but it just
refuses to make folders. Im trying to install counter-strike but when i
set the install directory and the program asks if i want to create it i
click ok but nothing happens. if i make the directory myself everything
goes fine, the files are copied and everything. all the permissions seem
to be set correctly.. any help?
2001 Nov 09
1
Explorer with wine
Hi,
I don't really know if it is the reason but when i tried tu run my
explorer.exe with wine (without success) It removed all i had in
'Program Files' directory and added a folder 'Uninstall Information ...'.
Does anyone know about it ... anyway it would be a warning.
--
Omar
2002 Jan 29
1
Wine and damage of original MS Windows
...xplorer, for instance,
if you don't have a proper backup, as it renames/cripples several
directories sometimes. Not even other MS apps such as e.g. Messenger are safe,
as they launch Explorer somehow. This particular corruption (!$!$!$!$.pfr)
can at least partially be fixed by using
http://home.nexgo.de/andi.mohr/download/decorrupt_explorer"
----
Do you have any idea how to protect original Windows without backup?
Or is the backup the only solution in this time?
Thanks for hints,
Petr
2002 Feb 16
1
Newbie Trying To Get Ghost Recon To Install
Hello,
I'm new to using WINE (and to these lists), so I apologize if this has
been asked and answered already: Has anyone been able to get Ghost Recon
to at least install? The autorun program came up just fine, but when I
click the button to install, it promptly quits. I tried running the
setup.exe program directly, and it gets as far as trying to setup and
install shield wizard, and then
2018 Nov 26
2
BUGS in code generated for target i386-win32
"Tim Northover" <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 12:37, Stefan Kanthak via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> LLVM/clang generates wrong code for the following program
>> (see <https://godbolt.org/z/UZrrkG>):
>
> It looks like all of these issues come down to mismatched
2004 Aug 06
2
[Bug] PCM file not recognized
Hi,
I am using Speex to compress speech samples used for dictation. I am
thrilled by the compression ratios Speex achieves with almost no loss in
quality.
However, I have come across a few files which Speex (I use the Windows
variant) refuses to compress. I have put a sample file at
http://leggewie.biz/test.wav. The error message I receive is
"Unsupported WAVE file fmt chunk, not
2019 Aug 20
1
Slow XCHG in arch/i386/libgcc/__ashrdi3.S and arch/i386/libgcc/__lshrdi3.S
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> wrote August 20, 2019 12:51 AM:
> On 8/14/19 9:42 PM, Stefan Kanthak wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> both
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/klibc/klibc.git/plain/usr/klibc/arch/i386/libgcc/__ashldi3.S
>> and
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/klibc/klibc.git/plain/usr/klibc/arch/i386/libgcc/__lshrdi3.S
2018 Nov 27
2
Rather poor code optimisation of current clang/LLVM targeting Intel x86 (both -64 and -32)
"Sanjay Patel" <spatel at rotateright.com> wrote:
> IIUC, you want to use x86-specific bit-hacks (sbb masking) in cases like
> this:
> unsigned int foo(unsigned int crc) {
> if (crc & 0x80000000)
> crc <<= 1, crc ^= 0xEDB88320;
> else
> crc <<= 1;
> return crc;
> }
To document this for x86 too: rewrite the function
2018 Nov 25
2
BUGS n code generated for target i386 compiling __bswapdi3, and for target x86-64 compiling __bswapsi2()
...5 pushl %ebp
1f71: 89 e5 movl %esp, %ebp
1f73: 8b 55 08 movl 8(%ebp), %edx
1f76: 8b 45 0c movl 12(%ebp), %eax
1f79: 0f c8 bswapl %eax
1f7b: 0f ca bswapl %edx
1f7d: 5d popl %ebp
1f7e: c3 retl
~Craig
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:39 AM Stefan Kanthak <stefan.kanthak at nexgo.de>
wrote:
> "Craig Topper" <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > bswapdi2 for i386 is correct
>
> OUCH!
>
> > Bits 31:0 of the source are loaded into edx. Bits 63:32 are loaded into
> > eax. Those are each bswapped.
>
> This exchanges t...
2018 Nov 25
3
BUGS n code generated for target i386 compiling __bswapdi3, and for target x86-64 compiling __bswapsi2()
bswapdi2 for i386 is correct
Bits 31:0 of the source are loaded into edx. Bits 63:32 are loaded into
eax. Those are each bswapped. The ABI for the return is edx contains bits
[63:32] and eax contains [31:0]. This is opposite of how the register were
loaded.
~Craig
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:36 AM Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com>
wrote:
> bswapsi2 on the x86-64 isn't using
2018 Dec 03
3
The builtins library of compiler-rt is a performance HOG^WKILLER
"Craig Topper" <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote:
> None of the "si" division routines will be used by x86.
That was my expectation too.
> They exist for targets that don't support the operations natively.
> X86 supports them natively so will never use the library functions.
So they SHOULD not be built (or at least not shipped) with the
builtins library
2013 Mar 18
0
[linux-linus test] 17325: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
...>
Philippe Rétornaz <philippe.retornaz@epfl.ch>
Phillip Lougher <phillip@squashfs.org.uk>
Phillip Susi <psusi@ubuntu.com>
Pierangelo Terzulli <pierigno@gmail.com>
Piergiorgio Beruto <piergiorgio.beruto@gmail.com>
Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>
Pierre Carrier <pierre@spotify.com>
Pierre Sauter <pierre.sauter@gmail.com>
Pierre Tardy <pierre.tardy@intel.com>
Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pelloux@gmail.com>
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Pierre-Loup A. Griffais <p...