search for: newnightlytest

...> > OK, that should be easy to add. > > > >> Just be sure not to change what it sends to the website. That needs > >> to > >> stay the same. > > > > Sure. I think wrapping an if statement around the HTTP send should be > > easy; the code of NewNightlyTester.pl isn't very complicated. > > > > Cool. Actually it's trivial. There was an undocumented $TESTING variable that already did exactly what -noreport was supposed to do. Patch is attached. Option is now named -nosubmit, in line with -submit-server and -submit-script. > P....

...e reporting test suite results either. Here's the meat of my nightly script, run from cron: export BUILDDIR=$HOME/llvm-test export WEBDIR=$HOME/llvm-test-results export LLVMGCCDIR=$HOME/llvm-gcc/install cd -- "$HOME" mkdir -p -- "$WEBDIR" cd llvm utils/NewNightlyTest.pl -release -parallel -noexternals -noremoveresults -nickname martini where $HOME/llvm is an LLVM checkout that I keep up to date manually. I also have llvm-gcc installed on the same system in /usr/local/bin/. Could anyone who has the nightly tester set up properly please comment on what my pr...

...I have been making some changes to the nightly tester that will hopefully make debugging problems and performance issues easier. The big change is nightly test results will now be kept in a central location (http://llvm.org/nightlytest/index.php). I have committed a new file to utils/ called 'NewNightlyTest.pl'. It *should* behave almost exactly like the previous NightlyTest.pl except that instead of spitting out a web page it will submit the results to llvm.org by an HTTP POST request. I would like to start transitioning testers to the new testing scheme. This will hopefully be a painless proces...

I've made some modifications to the NewNightlyTest.pl script and I'm noticing many testers do not seem to update this script (judging from the data being submitted to our database). Please update the script manually, or modify you cron (or whatever you have controlling your tester) to automatically update the testing script before running t...

All, I've updated the NewNightlyTest.pl script again to fix a bug. If you're running this script, please make a note of the following: * There was a bug that only allowed the script to work with SVN if the -verbose option was also given (yeah, go figure). That's been fixed now. * The script now de...

...ption is probably a good idea too. > > OK, that should be easy to add. > >> Just be sure not to change what it sends to the website. That needs >> to >> stay the same. > > Sure. I think wrapping an if statement around the HTTP send should be > easy; the code of NewNightlyTester.pl isn't very complicated. > Cool. > On a tangent: > What's the best way to submit patches: Bugzilla? Something else? > Send to llvm-commits or llvm-dev (as long as its not too big). -Tanya P.S. I'm not sure if someone has gotten a chance to look at your dejagnu bug...

hello every body. Here with I have attached the patch which compile the llvm-gcc using nightly tester script. This patch add the following capabilities to the NewNightlyTester.pl script. 1. Checkout the llvm-gcc4.2 source from the SVN. 2. Compile the checkout llvm-gcc4.2 source tree. 3. Gather the configure/make out put informations. 4. Add the (3) informations to the %hash_of_data hash to be posted to the server, of course for further processing. Please review the p...

Hi all, when looking at NewNightlyTester.pl, I see it has several distinct phases: 1. Get a current tree 2. ./configure 3. Build 4. Run a selection of tests 7. Send test results to web site 8. Clean up Wouldn't it make sense to allow each phase to be activated individually? Or possibly a subset of phases, something along the lines...

On Mar 8, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > Hi all, > > when looking at NewNightlyTester.pl, I see it has several distinct > phases: > > 1. Get a current tree > 2. ./configure > 3. Build > 4. Run a selection of tests > 7. Send test results to web site > 8. Clean up > > Wouldn't it make sense to allow each phase to be activated > individually? &g...

Hard to tell what's wrong. Perhaps /usr/local/bin is not part of path for a cron job? You should add NewNightlyTest.pl -noremove -release options. That leaves the build directory around for you examine it afterwards. Just manually delete the build directory before running NewNightlyTest.pl. Evan On Jul 20, 2008, at 6:00 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > I've noticed that my nightly tester doesn't seem...

...arate regression test.) > A -noreport option is probably a good idea too. OK, that should be easy to add. > Just be sure not to change what it sends to the website. That needs to > stay the same. Sure. I think wrapping an if statement around the HTTP send should be easy; the code of NewNightlyTester.pl isn't very complicated. On a tangent: What's the best way to submit patches: Bugzilla? Something else? Regards, Jo

On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Reid Spencer wrote: > This is a reminder that the script will change so that tonight's nightly > test will use the hybrid svn/cvs version. This requires the Date::Parse > perl module. If you haven't installed it yet, please do so before the > next run of your nightly test. Hi Reid, We didn't have a chance to talk about this much when this came up, but

On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 14:07 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Reid Spencer wrote: > > This is a reminder that the script will change so that tonight's nightly > > test will use the hybrid svn/cvs version. This requires the Date::Parse > > perl module. If you haven't installed it yet, please do so before the > > next run of your nightly test. >

On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Reid Spencer wrote: >> this is another dependency people have to satisfy to be able to run the >> nightly tester. Is there any way to avoid this? > > Only two things I can think of: > > 1. Forgo having "what changed" information in the nightly test > 2. Ask Anton to write the date parsing without using Date::Parse and do > the parsing

Hello, Chris. > I agree. Is the date in a fixed format? wouldn't a simple regex do the > trick? It seems it doesn't have fixed format. At least it: 1. Outputs local time. 2. Date string contains national symbols We should parse date by hands and filter revisions, which took place during prev. day. So, in general we need 2 routines: 1. Parse date into some internal format. 2.

Adam, > Do you have some examples of the string to parse? Surely (I don't know, what's the output with different locales): Moved for versioning. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r33 | jlaskey | 2006-08-01 00:59:18 +0400 (Втр, 01 Авг 2006) | 1 line Moved for versioning. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r32

...directly. Thanks! -Rajika On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri <rajikacc at gmail.com> wrote: > hello every body. > > Here with I have attached the patch which compile the llvm-gcc using > nightly tester script. This patch add the following capabilities to the > NewNightlyTester.pl script. > > 1. Checkout the llvm-gcc4.2 source from the SVN. > 2. Compile the checkout llvm-gcc4.2 source tree. > 3. Gather the configure/make out put informations. > 4. Add the (3) informations to the %hash_of_data hash to be posted to the > server, of course for further pro...

On Mar 11, 2008, at 8:14 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > Am Samstag, den 08.03.2008, 14:02 -0800 schrieb Tanya Lattner: >> - ability to check out llvm-gcc or update llvm-gcc and build it >> before >> running tests. > > This seems to be a bit more complicated than I thought. There are > variations in the build process depending on whether it's a Darwin >

...we need to test the email notification scripts, but don't make commits you want to keep there. CVS is still the official repository until the cut over on Friday. * If you run a nightly tester, please add "-usesvn" to the command line that runs the NewNightlyTest.pl script. This will cause NewNightlyTest.pl to check out from Subversion instead of CVS. If you have your own copy of NewNightlyTest.pl, get a new version. In the next couple of days we will be converting other services like ViewVC to use Subversion instead of CVS. By Frid...

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:02:18PM -0800, Julien Lerouge wrote: > For 2), I think the NewNightlyTest.pl script would require some small > changes, to invoke the jcheck target instead of check, pass the desired > -j flag, and also parse the log. I'll take a look. In any case, the > changes would only apply to the DejaGNU tests (llvm-test already works > fine with -jX). Here is an u...