search for: new_

I''m trying to create a form/view that displays a mix of records that exist in the database and records that the user is working on but that don''t yet exist in the database. I want to leverage all of rails'' nice form helpers, especially the params hash that it generates for the records when the form is submitted. So - I am creating ''dummy'' records with

...llo, I think I have come across an inconsistency between gcc and clang/llvm with respect to returning small structs. Given the following code: > struct s { > int a; > int b; > }; > > struct s3 { > int a; > int b; > int c; > }; > > struct s new_s(int v){ > struct s res; > res.a = v; > res.b = -v; > return res; > } > > struct s3 new_s3(int v){ > struct s3 res; > res.a = v; > res.b = -v; > res.c = v<<2; > return res; > } For the function new_s() both the curren...

...gment **************** def add_linea_link(name, form) link_to_function name do |page| nueva_linea = @factura.lineas.build linea = render(:partial => ''linea'', :locals => { :pf => form, :linea => nueva_linea}) page << %{ var new_linea_id = "new_" + new Date().getTime(); $(''lineas'').insert({ bottom: "#{ escape_javascript linea }".replace(/new_\\d+/g, new_linea_id) }); } end end ********** _form.erb.html from facturas fragment ********** <table id="...

...-ro > > Then it doesn't response input for almost 1 minute. > Without this patch, kernel loads quickly. Interesting. I guess there's time to debug it, since QEMU 2.6 is still a few months away. In the meanwhile we can apply your patch as is, apart from disabling the "if (new_head >= cq->size)" and the similar one for "if (new_ tail >= sq->size". But, I have a possible culprit. In your nvme_cq_notifier you are not doing the equivalent of: start_sqs = nvme_cq_full(cq) ? 1 : 0; cq->head = new_head; if (start_sqs) {...

Where is the code that maps the kernel of a DomU into memory? i.e, when you do a xm create <config file> what code is called to actually map the kernel into memory? Is it a python script or is it re-directed to Dom0 to do? Thanks. -Brian --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.

Where is the code that maps the kernel of a DomU into memory? i.e, when you do a xm create <config file> what code is called to actually map the kernel into memory? Is it a python script or is it re-directed to Dom0 to do? Thanks. -Brian --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.

...;'m processing new records in the create method and updating records in the update method. I''d like to have one method to handle both create and update (an attempt to dry up my code). I''m using my own naming convention in params for new records, the model name with "new_" appended. I''m thinking how I might be able to right this all-in-one method (both create and update method). My hunch is that a proper naming scheme for the params keys would make it easier. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...tp://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/HowToReuseEditViewsForNewViews There''s this comment there saying you only need the tag "<%= auto_form %>" when using the code below. Can somebody tell me if that will work when extending it with model_name (some how)? I have several new_* methods (e.g. new_contact, new_company, new_project, etc), and I''m not going to bother with this challenge when you big guys out there tell me it''s a no go to develop this. def auto_form action = case controller.action_name when "new" then "create"...

If I have a resource called ''assets'' then I get for free a bunch of helpers, like assets_path new_asset_path and so forth, right? I would like to be able to create a call to one of these on the fly when I only find out the name of the resource at run time. For example I would like to do this: resource_name = "assets" resource_path(resource_name, method => :new) Anyone know the R...

...nzini wrote: >> >> On 18/11/2015 06:47, Ming Lin wrote: >>> @@ -726,7 +798,11 @@ static void nvme_process_db(NvmeCtrl *n, hwaddr addr, int val) >>> } >>> >>> start_sqs = nvme_cq_full(cq) ? 1 : 0; >>> - cq->head = new_head; >>> + /* When the mapped pointer memory area is setup, we don't rely on >>> + * the MMIO written values to update the head pointer. */ >>> + if (!cq->db_addr) { >>> + cq->head = new_head; >>> + } &gt...

...nzini wrote: >> >> On 18/11/2015 06:47, Ming Lin wrote: >>> @@ -726,7 +798,11 @@ static void nvme_process_db(NvmeCtrl *n, hwaddr addr, int val) >>> } >>> >>> start_sqs = nvme_cq_full(cq) ? 1 : 0; >>> - cq->head = new_head; >>> + /* When the mapped pointer memory area is setup, we don't rely on >>> + * the MMIO written values to update the head pointer. */ >>> + if (!cq->db_addr) { >>> + cq->head = new_head; >>> + } &gt...

All, I''m finally doing my first real form in Rails - the model object that I''m entering information for has 8 validations so far. If I type in good values for all the fields but one, I get the pretty validation, and the nice field highlighting, but all of the fields are cleared, forcing me to retype all of that info. That is a big drag. Is there a standard way to get the

...nores the "Bus" field, because > - it can change during a reconnect. */ > - return 1; > + > + return 2; > } > > -/* constructor: return a new matcher that matches the exact HIDDevice_t > - * d. Return NULL with errno set on error. */ > -HIDDeviceMatcher_t *new_exact_matcher(HIDDevice_t *d) > +/* constructor: create an exact matcher that matches the device. > + * On success, return 0 and store the matcher in *matcher. On > + * error, return -1 with errno set > + */ > +int HIDNewExactMatcher(HIDDeviceMatcher_t **matcher, HIDDevice_t *hd) >...

...return -EINVAL; else { rq->biotail->bi_next = bio; rq->biotail = bio; rq->__data_len += bio->bi_size; } return 0; } diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c index 160035f..61538b3 100644 --- a/block/blk-merge.c +++ b/block/blk-merge.c @@ -64,19 +64,21 @@ new_segment: fbio->bi_seg_front_size = seg_size; if (seg_size > bbio->bi_seg_back_size) bbio->bi_seg_back_size = seg_size; return nr_phys_segs; } void blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq) { - rq->nr_phys_segments = __blk_recalc_rq_segments(rq->q, rq->bio); + s...

...return -EINVAL; else { rq->biotail->bi_next = bio; rq->biotail = bio; rq->__data_len += bio->bi_size; } return 0; } diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c index 160035f..61538b3 100644 --- a/block/blk-merge.c +++ b/block/blk-merge.c @@ -64,19 +64,21 @@ new_segment: fbio->bi_seg_front_size = seg_size; if (seg_size > bbio->bi_seg_back_size) bbio->bi_seg_back_size = seg_size; return nr_phys_segs; } void blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq) { - rq->nr_phys_segments = __blk_recalc_rq_segments(rq->q, rq->bio); + s...

This is, hopefully, a full fix for handling of li-records. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717583 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987463 Rich.