thr3ads.net - Virtualization - [PATCH -qemu] nvme: support Google vendor extension [Nov 2015]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Paolo Bonzini

2015-Nov-19 10:37 UTC

[PATCH -qemu] nvme: support Google vendor extension

On 18/11/2015 06:47, Ming Lin wrote:> @@ -726,7 +798,11 @@ static void nvme_process_db(NvmeCtrl *n, hwaddr addr,
int val)
>          }
>  
>          start_sqs = nvme_cq_full(cq) ? 1 : 0;
> -        cq->head = new_head;
> +        /* When the mapped pointer memory area is setup, we don't rely
on
> +         * the MMIO written values to update the head pointer. */
> +        if (!cq->db_addr) {
> +            cq->head = new_head;
> +        }
You are still checking

        if (new_head >= cq->size) {
            return;
        }

above.  I think this is incorrect when the extension is present, and
furthermore it's the only case where val is being used.

If you're not using val, you could use ioeventfd for the MMIO.  An
ioeventfd cuts the MMIO cost by at least 55% and up to 70%. Here are
quick and dirty measurements from kvm-unit-tests's vmexit.flat
benchmark, on two very different machines:

			Haswell-EP		Ivy Bridge i7
  MMIO memory write	5100 -> 2250 (55%)	7000 -> 3000 (58%)
  I/O port write	3800 -> 1150 (70%)	4100 -> 1800 (57%)

You would need to allocate two eventfds for each qid, one for the sq and
one for the cq.  Also, processing the queues is now bounced to the QEMU
iothread, so you can probably get rid of sq->timer and cq->timer.

Paolo

Ming Lin

2015-Nov-20 08:11 UTC

head link

[PATCH -qemu] nvme: support Google vendor extension

On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:37 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:> 
> On 18/11/2015 06:47, Ming Lin wrote:
> > @@ -726,7 +798,11 @@ static void nvme_process_db(NvmeCtrl *n, hwaddr
addr, int val)
> >          }
> >  
> >          start_sqs = nvme_cq_full(cq) ? 1 : 0;
> > -        cq->head = new_head;
> > +        /* When the mapped pointer memory area is setup, we don't
rely on
> > +         * the MMIO written values to update the head pointer. */
> > +        if (!cq->db_addr) {
> > +            cq->head = new_head;
> > +        }
> 
> You are still checking
> 
>         if (new_head >= cq->size) {
>             return;
>         }
> 
> above.  I think this is incorrect when the extension is present, and
> furthermore it's the only case where val is being used.
> 
> If you're not using val, you could use ioeventfd for the MMIO.  An
> ioeventfd cuts the MMIO cost by at least 55% and up to 70%. Here are
> quick and dirty measurements from kvm-unit-tests's vmexit.flat
> benchmark, on two very different machines:
> 
> 			Haswell-EP		Ivy Bridge i7
>   MMIO memory write	5100 -> 2250 (55%)	7000 -> 3000 (58%)
>   I/O port write	3800 -> 1150 (70%)	4100 -> 1800 (57%)
> 
> You would need to allocate two eventfds for each qid, one for the sq and
> one for the cq.  Also, processing the queues is now bounced to the QEMU
> iothread, so you can probably get rid of sq->timer and cq->timer.
Here is a quick try.
Too late now, I'll test it morning.

Do you see obvious problem?

diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c
index 3e1c38d..d28690d 100644
--- a/hw/block/nvme.c
+++ b/hw/block/nvme.c
@@ -543,6 +543,44 @@ static uint16_t nvme_set_feature(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeCmd *cmd,
NvmeRequest *req)
     return NVME_SUCCESS;
 }
 
+static void nvme_cq_notifier(EventNotifier *e)
+{
+    NvmeCQueue *cq +        container_of(e, NvmeCQueue, notifier);
+
+    nvme_post_cqes(cq);
+}
+
+static void nvme_init_cq_eventfd(NvmeCQueue *cq)
+{
+    NvmeCtrl *n = cq->ctrl;
+    uint16_t offset = (cq->cqid*2+1) * NVME_CAP_DSTRD(n->bar.cap);
+
+    event_notifier_init(&cq->notifier, 0);
+    event_notifier_set_handler(&cq->notifier, nvme_cq_notifier);
+    memory_region_add_eventfd(&n->iomem,
+        0x1000 + offset, 4, true, cq->cqid*2+1, &cq->notifier);
+}
+
+static void nvme_sq_notifier(EventNotifier *e)
+{
+    NvmeSQueue *sq +        container_of(e, NvmeSQueue, notifier);
+
+    nvme_process_sq(sq);
+}
+
+static void nvme_init_sq_eventfd(NvmeSQueue *sq)
+{
+    NvmeCtrl *n = sq->ctrl;
+    uint16_t offset = sq->sqid * 2 * NVME_CAP_DSTRD(n->bar.cap);
+
+    event_notifier_init(&sq->notifier, 0);
+    event_notifier_set_handler(&sq->notifier, nvme_sq_notifier);
+    memory_region_add_eventfd(&n->iomem,
+        0x1000 + offset, 4, true, sq->sqid * 2, &sq->notifier);
+}
+
 static uint16_t nvme_set_db_memory(NvmeCtrl *n, const NvmeCmd *cmd)
 {
     uint64_t db_addr = le64_to_cpu(cmd->prp1);
@@ -565,6 +603,7 @@ static uint16_t nvme_set_db_memory(NvmeCtrl *n, const
NvmeCmd *cmd)
             /* Submission queue tail pointer location, 2 * QID * stride. */
             sq->db_addr = db_addr + 2 * i * 4;
             sq->eventidx_addr = eventidx_addr + 2 * i * 4;
+            nvme_init_sq_eventfd(sq);
         }
 
         if (cq != NULL) {
@@ -572,6 +611,7 @@ static uint16_t nvme_set_db_memory(NvmeCtrl *n, const
NvmeCmd *cmd)
              */
             cq->db_addr = db_addr + (2 * i + 1) * 4;
             cq->eventidx_addr = eventidx_addr + (2 * i + 1) * 4;
+            nvme_init_cq_eventfd(cq);
         }
     }
     return NVME_SUCCESS;
@@ -793,7 +833,7 @@ static void nvme_process_db(NvmeCtrl *n, hwaddr addr, int
val)
         }
 
         cq = n->cq[qid];
-        if (new_head >= cq->size) {
+        if (!cq->db_addr && new_head >= cq->size) {
             return;
         }
 
diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.h b/hw/block/nvme.h
index 82aeab4..608f202 100644
--- a/hw/block/nvme.h
+++ b/hw/block/nvme.h
@@ -667,6 +667,7 @@ typedef struct NvmeSQueue {
      * do not go over this value will not result in MMIO writes (but will
      * still write the tail pointer to the "db_addr" location above).
*/
     uint64_t    eventidx_addr;
+    EventNotifier notifier;
 } NvmeSQueue;
 
 typedef struct NvmeCQueue {
@@ -689,6 +690,7 @@ typedef struct NvmeCQueue {
      * do not go over this value will not result in MMIO writes (but will
      * still write the head pointer to the "db_addr" location above).
*/
     uint64_t    eventidx_addr;
+    EventNotifier notifier;
 } NvmeCQueue;
 
 typedef struct NvmeNamespace {
> 
> Paolo

Paolo Bonzini

2015-Nov-20 08:58 UTC

head link

[PATCH -qemu] nvme: support Google vendor extension

On 20/11/2015 09:11, Ming Lin wrote:> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:37 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> On 18/11/2015 06:47, Ming Lin wrote:
>>> @@ -726,7 +798,11 @@ static void nvme_process_db(NvmeCtrl *n,
hwaddr addr, int val)
>>>          }
>>>  
>>>          start_sqs = nvme_cq_full(cq) ? 1 : 0;
>>> -        cq->head = new_head;
>>> +        /* When the mapped pointer memory area is setup, we
don't rely on
>>> +         * the MMIO written values to update the head pointer. */
>>> +        if (!cq->db_addr) {
>>> +            cq->head = new_head;
>>> +        }
>>
>> You are still checking
>>
>>         if (new_head >= cq->size) {
>>             return;
>>         }
>>
>> above.  I think this is incorrect when the extension is present, and
>> furthermore it's the only case where val is being used.
>>
>> If you're not using val, you could use ioeventfd for the MMIO.  An
>> ioeventfd cuts the MMIO cost by at least 55% and up to 70%. Here are
>> quick and dirty measurements from kvm-unit-tests's vmexit.flat
>> benchmark, on two very different machines:
>>
>> 			Haswell-EP		Ivy Bridge i7
>>   MMIO memory write	5100 -> 2250 (55%)	7000 -> 3000 (58%)
>>   I/O port write	3800 -> 1150 (70%)	4100 -> 1800 (57%)
>>
>> You would need to allocate two eventfds for each qid, one for the sq
and
>> one for the cq.  Also, processing the queues is now bounced to the QEMU
>> iothread, so you can probably get rid of sq->timer and cq->timer.
> 
> Here is a quick try.
> Too late now, I'll test it morning.
> 
> Do you see obvious problem?
> 
> diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c
> index 3e1c38d..d28690d 100644
> --- a/hw/block/nvme.c
> +++ b/hw/block/nvme.c
> @@ -543,6 +543,44 @@ static uint16_t nvme_set_feature(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeCmd
*cmd, NvmeRequest *req)
>      return NVME_SUCCESS;
>  }
>  
> +static void nvme_cq_notifier(EventNotifier *e)
> +{
> +    NvmeCQueue *cq > +        container_of(e, NvmeCQueue, notifier);
> +
> +    nvme_post_cqes(cq);
> +}
> +
> +static void nvme_init_cq_eventfd(NvmeCQueue *cq)
> +{
> +    NvmeCtrl *n = cq->ctrl;
> +    uint16_t offset = (cq->cqid*2+1) * NVME_CAP_DSTRD(n->bar.cap);
> +
> +    event_notifier_init(&cq->notifier, 0);
> +    event_notifier_set_handler(&cq->notifier, nvme_cq_notifier);
> +    memory_region_add_eventfd(&n->iomem,
> +        0x1000 + offset, 4, true, cq->cqid*2+1, &cq->notifier);
should be 0x1000 + offset, 4, false, 0, &cq->notifier
> +}
> +
> +static void nvme_sq_notifier(EventNotifier *e)
> +{
> +    NvmeSQueue *sq > +        container_of(e, NvmeSQueue, notifier);
> +
> +    nvme_process_sq(sq);
> +}
> +
> +static void nvme_init_sq_eventfd(NvmeSQueue *sq)
> +{
> +    NvmeCtrl *n = sq->ctrl;
> +    uint16_t offset = sq->sqid * 2 * NVME_CAP_DSTRD(n->bar.cap);
> +
> +    event_notifier_init(&sq->notifier, 0);
> +    event_notifier_set_handler(&sq->notifier, nvme_sq_notifier);
> +    memory_region_add_eventfd(&n->iomem,
> +        0x1000 + offset, 4, true, sq->sqid * 2, &sq->notifier);
likewise should be 0x1000 + offset, 4, false, 0, &sq->notifier

Otherwise looks good!

Paolo
> +}
> +
>  static uint16_t nvme_set_db_memory(NvmeCtrl *n, const NvmeCmd *cmd)
>  {
>      uint64_t db_addr = le64_to_cpu(cmd->prp1);
> @@ -565,6 +603,7 @@ static uint16_t nvme_set_db_memory(NvmeCtrl *n, const
NvmeCmd *cmd)
>              /* Submission queue tail pointer location, 2 * QID * stride.
*/
>              sq->db_addr = db_addr + 2 * i * 4;
>              sq->eventidx_addr = eventidx_addr + 2 * i * 4;
> +            nvme_init_sq_eventfd(sq);
>          }
>  
>          if (cq != NULL) {
> @@ -572,6 +611,7 @@ static uint16_t nvme_set_db_memory(NvmeCtrl *n, const
NvmeCmd *cmd)
>               */
>              cq->db_addr = db_addr + (2 * i + 1) * 4;
>              cq->eventidx_addr = eventidx_addr + (2 * i + 1) * 4;
> +            nvme_init_cq_eventfd(cq);
>          }
>      }
>      return NVME_SUCCESS;
> @@ -793,7 +833,7 @@ static void nvme_process_db(NvmeCtrl *n, hwaddr addr,
int val)
>          }
>  
>          cq = n->cq[qid];
> -        if (new_head >= cq->size) {
> +        if (!cq->db_addr && new_head >= cq->size) {
>              return;
>          }
>  
> diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.h b/hw/block/nvme.h
> index 82aeab4..608f202 100644
> --- a/hw/block/nvme.h
> +++ b/hw/block/nvme.h
> @@ -667,6 +667,7 @@ typedef struct NvmeSQueue {
>       * do not go over this value will not result in MMIO writes (but will
>       * still write the tail pointer to the "db_addr" location
above). */
>      uint64_t    eventidx_addr;
> +    EventNotifier notifier;
>  } NvmeSQueue;
>  
>  typedef struct NvmeCQueue {
> @@ -689,6 +690,7 @@ typedef struct NvmeCQueue {
>       * do not go over this value will not result in MMIO writes (but will
>       * still write the head pointer to the "db_addr" location
above). */
>      uint64_t    eventidx_addr;
> +    EventNotifier notifier;
>  } NvmeCQueue;
>  
>  typedef struct NvmeNamespace {
> 
>>
>> Paolo

Apparently Analagous Threads

Search for more possibly parallel threads

Virtualization - Nov 2015 - [PATCH -qemu] nvme: support Google vendor extension

[PATCH -qemu] nvme: support Google vendor extension

[PATCH -qemu] nvme: support Google vendor extension

[PATCH -qemu] nvme: support Google vendor extension

Apparently Analagous Threads