search for: netsecad

...of the ISP's is loaded on 100% while the other is utilised on 1 - 5% I've read about Julians patches but they stop at 2.6.14. Is anybody aware of similar patches for higher patchlevels. 2.6.14 is not suitable for my setup Thanks for reading :) -- С уважение, Владимир Витков http://www.netsecad.com http://www.supportbg.com _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hi all :) there is somekind of strange Routing problem that im getting with Linux-2.6.16 and iproute 2.6.16 , when i use command like : ip route add default nexthop via 1.1.1.1 dev eth0 nexthop via 1.1.1.2 dev eth1 all packets goes on 1.1.1.2 ( always last interface ) , whats is the problem ? this situation also tested with equalize flag , on two physical interface and etc ... -- Lady Luck

Hi, there is a way to graph host''s traffic from my lan ? I''ve a linux router (2.4.x kernel), and a lan: linux router : 192.168.1.254 host 1: 192.168.1.1 host 2: 192.168.1.2 host 3: 192.168.1.3 I''m looking for a way to graph traffic ( in / out ) from each 3 hosts, and store total traffic on a mysql table, in order to make statistics later. I think I can do with Mrtg,

...a fwmark 0x5190 table isp_rules1 question: Is this correct because it is causing more problems than before it was employed? Is the sequence ok i.e. mark the needed traffic, then add a rule somewhere to direct it over one of the isps. thanks in advance -- С уважение, Владимир Витков http://www.netsecad.com http://www.supportbg.com _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

I am trying to build a trafic control rule set for a huge NATed network, and I have it working for single known addresses but I need to scale it to 16M potential client addresses. I''m using iptables for NAT. Incoming traffic is simple because I can match destination address, outgoing traffic I use iptables IPMARK then tc match mark and it works perfectly if I build rules for each client