search for: netids

Hello! I''ve put some questions on this list some weeks ago and I''ve got good answers. Thank you! Now I''ve finished my (beautyful) script and I ran it on my router... About my script: It routes packages based on their destination on the Internet. I have about 1650 preffered destination networks listed in some file. The script read this file and marks every package for

Testing out tipc for cluster development, and running into an immediate snag. tipcutils was found in EPEL but despite having a "compatible" kernel, it doesn't seem to actually work. It's a completely updated system, Intel i5 with 16 GB of RAM, nothing remarkable. Any ideas? [root at backup2 ~]# tipc-config -netid=1234 -a=1.1.1 -be=eth:eth0 TIPC module not installed

I have samba 3.0.8, as a member of 2000AD and 2003AD. I would like to get groups and the members in each group. The purpose is to maintain a set of Filtering profiles on squidGuard that are based on AD groups. I will have a script that reads a config file with the groupnames to fetch from Active Directory and a Precedence order to set them in. One of the groups will be designated "a NO

Hai, ? im running samba 4.2.2 sernet on debian. ? when i run : samba-tool gpo aclcheck -UAdministrator ? im getting : ERROR: Invalid GPO ACL O:DAG:DAD:PAI(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED) and it tells me it should be O:DAG:DAD:P?

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Benjamin Smith <lists at benjamindsmith.com> wrote: > Testing out tipc for cluster development, and running into an immediate snag. > tipcutils was found in EPEL but despite having a "compatible" kernel, it > doesn't seem to actually work. > > It's a completely updated system, Intel i5 with 16 GB of RAM, nothing >

Not a CentOS specific question, but I'll try anyway. :) I've decided I need a proper IP Management solution. In a perfect world I'd like something like QIP or NetID, but I have a feeling that's too much so ask, so I'll go for DHCP/DNS management. :) There's alot of different opensource products out there, but I'd rather get recommendations than spend days

On 04/01/16 01:43, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > Hi, > > A while ago I successfully set permissions on a section of my LDAP / AD > tree, using either ADUC or ADSIEDIT (I forget which). These permissions > allowed my own user to access this section of the tree; I removed > permissions for 'Domain Admins' etc. to ensure that others would not be > able to view or change the

>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: woensdag 17 juni 2015 10:54 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] samba tool and sysvol/gpo checks >error/bugged? ( but it all works ok) > >On 17/06/15 08:15, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> Hai, >>

To get the automount schema to work with the git checkout of samba 4 I had to modify the automount schema files and separate the attributes from the classes. I also discovered that it's required to have the ntSecurityDescriptor , instanceType, and objectCategory attributes. Without these it will crash whenever you try to browse... I did alot of stopping samba, tarring of /usr/local/samba and

...chine is a dedicated Samba server, which serves about 200-300 users. > However, neither the file systems nor the user accounts are in this > Samba server. The file systems are in several other NFS servers, and > user accounts are in another NIS server. However, user accounts are > their netids (like zs24) which are authenticated again Yale central > AD. This is the only reason why the Samba server must join AD, i.e. to > authenticate user. It sounds like you are sharing NFS shares via Samba, for various reasons this is not a good idea. Your other problem is that NIS, for all inten...

Hi, A while ago I successfully set permissions on a section of my LDAP / AD tree, using either ADUC or ADSIEDIT (I forget which). These permissions allowed my own user to access this section of the tree; I removed permissions for 'Domain Admins' etc. to ensure that others would not be able to view or change the data - this has worked great for many months. I have just tried to add a new