search for: nessisarili

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "nessisarili".

Did you mean: nessisarily
2006 Apr 03
5
Stupid newbie question
Is there a configuration file in asterisk used for modifying Daylight savings time or is this strictly being dictated by linux? ________________________________ Mark Galley * Systems Administrator acgroup <http://www.bflo.com/> Aurora Consulting Group, Inc. * 7625 Seneca Street * East Aurora, NY 14052 Phone 716.655.9000 X118 * Cell 716.238.3535 * Fax 716.655.4957 * www.BFLO.com
2005 May 05
2
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
On May 5, Misha Brukman wrote: > Maybe we can use you for a testimonial... :) Certainly. > > Tail Call Elimination: > > > > I've read over the "Random llvm notes", and see that you guys have > > though about this already. > > > > However, the note dates from last year, so I am wondering if there is > > an implementation in the works.
2005 May 16
3
Need off-the-shelve PC for Asterisk Server
Does any one have any recommendations on an off-the-shelve PC for an Asterisk Server? This is for a proof of concept, so it needs to be inexpensive. I have tried 2 different PC's and had problems with the sound cards. I am thinking of PC's I can buy from local dealers like Best Buy, Office Depot. SO a cheap HP, Compaq or eMachine would work fine for me. --Steve
2005 May 05
2
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Misha Brukman wrote: > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:46:58AM -0400, Alexander Friedman wrote: >> On May 5, Misha Brukman wrote: >>> To the best of my knowledge, this has not been done and no one has >>> announced their intent to work on it, so if you are interested, >>> you'd be more than welcome to do so. >> >> My C++ knowledge
2005 May 10
0
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
LLVM list, I bumped into Alex Friedman in the hall today and by coincidence he mentioned that they were switching to LLVM for their PLT Scheme JIT project. I had evaluated LLVM a few weeks ago for my own purposes, but decided that it was too C/C++ centered and that critical features such as tail call optimization and other stack manipulation features were likely stagnant. So naturally I asked
2005 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:46:58AM -0400, Alexander Friedman wrote: > On May 5, Misha Brukman wrote: > > To the best of my knowledge, this has not been done and no one has > > announced their intent to work on it, so if you are interested, > > you'd be more than welcome to do so. > > My C++ knowledge is completely non-existant, but so far I've had a >
2005 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
Hi, Alexander! On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:59:06PM -0400, Alexander Friedman wrote: > I am in the preliminary stages of adding a JIT compiler to a sizable > Scheme system (PLT Scheme). Cool! > The original plan was to use GNU Lightning, but 1) it seems to be > dead, and 2) LLVM has already done a huge amount of stuff that I would > have had to write (poorly) from scratch. Maybe
2005 May 05
4
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
Hi List, I am in the preliminary stages of adding a JIT compiler to a sizable Scheme system (PLT Scheme). The original plan was to use GNU Lightning, but 1) it seems to be dead, and 2) LLVM has already done a huge amount of stuff that I would have had to write (poorly) from scratch. At the moment, LLVM seems to be the ideal choice for implementing the Scheme JIT, but there are problems that need