Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "nessisarili".
Did you mean:
nessisarily
2006 Apr 03
5
Stupid newbie question
Is there a configuration file in asterisk used for modifying Daylight savings time or is this strictly being dictated by linux?
________________________________
Mark Galley * Systems Administrator acgroup
<http://www.bflo.com/>
Aurora Consulting Group, Inc. * 7625 Seneca Street * East Aurora, NY 14052
Phone 716.655.9000 X118 * Cell 716.238.3535 * Fax 716.655.4957 * www.BFLO.com
2005 May 05
2
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
On May 5, Misha Brukman wrote:
> Maybe we can use you for a testimonial... :)
Certainly.
> > Tail Call Elimination:
> >
> > I've read over the "Random llvm notes", and see that you guys have
> > though about this already.
> >
> > However, the note dates from last year, so I am wondering if there is
> > an implementation in the works.
2005 May 16
3
Need off-the-shelve PC for Asterisk Server
Does any one have any recommendations on an off-the-shelve PC for an
Asterisk Server? This is for a proof of concept, so it needs to be
inexpensive. I have tried 2 different PC's and had problems with the sound
cards. I am thinking of PC's I can buy from local dealers like Best Buy,
Office Depot. SO a cheap HP, Compaq or eMachine would work fine for me.
--Steve
2005 May 05
2
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Misha Brukman wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:46:58AM -0400, Alexander Friedman wrote:
>> On May 5, Misha Brukman wrote:
>>> To the best of my knowledge, this has not been done and no one has
>>> announced their intent to work on it, so if you are interested,
>>> you'd be more than welcome to do so.
>>
>> My C++ knowledge
2005 May 10
0
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
LLVM list,
I bumped into Alex Friedman in the hall today and by coincidence
he mentioned that they were switching to LLVM for their PLT Scheme
JIT project. I had evaluated LLVM a few weeks ago for my own purposes,
but decided that it was too C/C++ centered and that critical features
such as tail call optimization and other stack manipulation features
were likely stagnant. So naturally I asked
2005 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:46:58AM -0400, Alexander Friedman wrote:
> On May 5, Misha Brukman wrote:
> > To the best of my knowledge, this has not been done and no one has
> > announced their intent to work on it, so if you are interested,
> > you'd be more than welcome to do so.
>
> My C++ knowledge is completely non-existant, but so far I've had a
>
2005 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
Hi, Alexander!
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:59:06PM -0400, Alexander Friedman wrote:
> I am in the preliminary stages of adding a JIT compiler to a sizable
> Scheme system (PLT Scheme).
Cool!
> The original plan was to use GNU Lightning, but 1) it seems to be
> dead, and 2) LLVM has already done a huge amount of stuff that I would
> have had to write (poorly) from scratch.
Maybe
2005 May 05
4
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
Hi List,
I am in the preliminary stages of adding a JIT compiler to a sizable
Scheme system (PLT Scheme). The original plan was to use GNU
Lightning, but 1) it seems to be dead, and 2) LLVM has already done a
huge amount of stuff that I would have had to write (poorly) from
scratch.
At the moment, LLVM seems to be the ideal choice for implementing the
Scheme JIT, but there are problems that need