search for: nessisarily

Is there a configuration file in asterisk used for modifying Daylight savings time or is this strictly being dictated by linux? ________________________________ Mark Galley * Systems Administrator acgroup <http://www.bflo.com/> Aurora Consulting Group, Inc. * 7625 Seneca Street * East Aurora, NY 14052 Phone 716.655.9000 X118 * Cell 716.238.3535 * Fax 716.655.4957 * www.BFLO.com

...aprocedural optimizations performed in gccas will make it problematic to call 'JIT::recompileAndRelinkFunction()' . For example, suppose I run run some module that looks like module a int foo () { ... bar() ... } int bar () { ... } through all of those optimizations. Will the result nessisarily have a bar() function? If inlining is enabled, replacing bar might have no effect if it's inlined in foo. If inlining is not enabled, are there other gotcha's like this? If there are complications like this, how much of a performance gain do the interprocedural opts give? Also, compileAnd...

Does any one have any recommendations on an off-the-shelve PC for an Asterisk Server? This is for a proof of concept, so it needs to be inexpensive. I have tried 2 different PC's and had problems with the sound cards. I am thinking of PC's I can buy from local dealers like Best Buy, Office Depot. SO a cheap HP, Compaq or eMachine would work fine for me. --Steve

...assuming that the >> interaprocedural optimizations performed in gccas will make it >> problematic to call 'JIT::recompileAndRelinkFunction()' . For example, >> suppose I run run some module that looks like ... >> through all of those optimizations. Will the result nessisarily have a >> bar() function? > > You are correct, it may get inlined. > >> If inlining is enabled, replacing bar might have no effect if it's >> inlined in foo. > > True. Yes, this is an important point. We build LLVM to be as modular as possible, which means tha...

...ural optimizations performed in gccas will make it >>> problematic to call 'JIT::recompileAndRelinkFunction()' . For >>> example, >>> suppose I run run some module that looks like > > ... > >>> through all of those optimizations. Will the result nessisarily have >>> a >>> bar() function? >> >> You are correct, it may get inlined. >> >>> If inlining is enabled, replacing bar might have no effect if it's >>> inlined in foo. >> >> True. > > Yes, this is an important point. >...

...ll 'JIT::recompileAndRelinkFunction()' . For example, > suppose I run run some module that looks like > > module a > > int foo () { > ... > bar() > ... > } > > int bar () { > ... > } > > through all of those optimizations. Will the result nessisarily have a > bar() function? You are correct, it may get inlined. > If inlining is enabled, replacing bar might have no effect if it's > inlined in foo. True. > If inlining is not enabled, are there other gotcha's like this? There are optimizations that will remove dead code...

Hi, Alexander! On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:59:06PM -0400, Alexander Friedman wrote: > I am in the preliminary stages of adding a JIT compiler to a sizable > Scheme system (PLT Scheme). Cool! > The original plan was to use GNU Lightning, but 1) it seems to be > dead, and 2) LLVM has already done a huge amount of stuff that I would > have had to write (poorly) from scratch. Maybe

Hi List, I am in the preliminary stages of adding a JIT compiler to a sizable Scheme system (PLT Scheme). The original plan was to use GNU Lightning, but 1) it seems to be dead, and 2) LLVM has already done a huge amount of stuff that I would have had to write (poorly) from scratch. At the moment, LLVM seems to be the ideal choice for implementing the Scheme JIT, but there are problems that need