search for: nenadic

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 43 matches for "nenadic".

2020 Jun 03
2
asterisk 16.9 function HINT with option n does not return anything
Hello ! Is there something wrong with the function HINT(<extension number>,n) ? Note the param n - it is supposed to get (as far as I understand the documentation) CALLERID(name) of the extension (via extension's hint). Example configuration: pjsip.conf: [10] type=endopoint . . callerid = Test extension <10> . . extensions.conf: [exts] exten => 10,hint,PJSIP/10 exten =>
2005 May 15
1
Re: SpanDSP TXFax and multipage faxes problems (aditional info)
Thanks for the information Lee ! Still, something is still strange to me, since this two Panasonic Fax machines are receiving at least 20 multi-paged faxes a day (they are in same office as both Asterisk boxes, and me :) ). Beside that, POTS lines in those two faxes are from same PSTN switch as line in X100P in one of Asterisk boxes, and the ISDN PRI lines in other Asterisk box is from same PSTN
2005 Sep 14
6
T.38 ATA
Hello all ! Can anyone recommend me ATA device that REALLY has T.38 built in. So far I have heard of Telco Systems Access201, which seems to be impossible to bye in Europe (all resselers are droped Telco systems ATAs for some reason (tried in Germany and in UK so far)), and I have heard that SIPURA SPA-2100 should have T.38 built in into newer firmware, but I wasn't able to confirm that
2019 Sep 19
1
Re: [PATCH nbdkit 0/2] Add new retry filter.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 01:47:45PM +0200, Nenad Peric wrote: > A theoretical way to test this against any other protocol is to have a > firewall rule which can be triggered locally which just drops the traffic > and then re-enables the traffic in a while (short or long, can be > decided/tweaked). We generally want our tests to run without root and without doing weird stuff to the
2018 Sep 24
2
Re: OpenStack output - server_id
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 6:30 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:00:21AM +0200, Fabien Dupont wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi Fabien, sorry I didn't respond to this earlier as I was doing some > work. If you CC me on emails then you can usually get a quicker > response. > > > I've read the virt-v2v OpenStack output code
2018 Sep 25
0
Re: OpenStack output - server_id
On my current instance, the meta_data.json is the following: { "availability_zone": "nova", "devices": [], "hostname": "ims-host-1", "keys": [ { "data": "ssh-rsa
2005 Jul 18
6
Panasonic KX-TD500
Anyone have any luck with connecting Asterisk to the Panasonic KX-TD500. I have Asterisk connected via crossover to the TE110P. We are able to make internal calls into the Asterisk Box but the PBX vendor (I know nothing about the KX-TD500) tells us it is not possible route DID over the trunk. I find this hard to believe. Anyone have any luck with this? Thanks! -------------- next part
2019 Sep 19
1
Re: Thoughts on nbdkit automatic reconnection
I have an update on the networking issue: - After the deep dive into the logs of the firewall by customer's security team, it turns out that even though there were some disconnections, the time-stamps do not match. This means that we got the disconnected by something else (ESXi or conversion host perhaps) - As we mentioned in the chat briefly, there could be general keep-alive issues on both
2005 Jan 28
2
Problem with chan_sccp and cisco 7960
Hi ! On Cisco 7960 (with or without 7914 add-on module) when I press speakerphone button (or select line with line button - which automatically put second line on speakerphone) after about 15-20 seconds of dialtone Asterisk stable dies (seg fault). Tested versions of Asterisk are 1.0.2, 1.0.3 or 1.0.5, chan_sccp is newest form CVS of chann-sccp.sourceforge.net ). Firmware of 7960 is
2019 Sep 19
0
Re: [PATCH nbdkit 0/2] Add new retry filter.
A theoretical way to test this against any other protocol is to have a firewall rule which can be triggered locally which just drops the traffic and then re-enables the traffic in a while (short or long, can be decided/tweaked). This way, there is no need to think about which protocol is used, when we kill the connectivity. The only consideration could probably be that the dropped connections
2005 Mar 28
0
Re: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 8, Issue 229
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Nenad Radosavljevic wrote: >> Only way I have managed to get Zap channel to reject a call on TE110P >> without answering it, is to dial number that is not handled in dialplan >> (I >> have a ISDN PRI with 100 number DID service, and about 30 of them are >> handled by dialplan). So far I didn't manage to reject call that are >>
2005 Jun 20
0
Re: app_valetparking.c for * STABLE
This one has compiled cleanly ! Thank you very much. Nenad > Oops, I sent the wrong one. Here's one I modified to work with 1.0.X > Try again > >> Nope ! This is the one that tries to include PRE 1.0.X header file >> <parking.h>. >> >> It cannot compile on * 1.0.X (I have tried also to include >> <features.h> instead of <parking.h>
2005 Aug 16
1
DISA over Zap (TE110P) issues on * STABLE 1.0.9
Hi ! Did anyone had issues/managed to solve issues with DISA over Zap channels on * 1.0.X (STABLE) ? I have a situatuion where DTMFs that should be recognized in DISA work over SIP channels and do not work over ZAP channels (Zap channels are on TE110P) I have in default context: exten=> 299,1,DISA(no-password|default) and I have SIP extension 200 in [default] and I have Zap trunk which
2005 May 16
1
Re: SpanDSP TXFax and multipage faxes problems (aditional info)
OK I see the ponit (although I never said that second page is interrupted - I said that in some combinations of resolutions and TIFF options receiving fax "spits" another blank sheet of paper beside the clearly received first page). I have read someware (some faxing tutuorial) that there is some kind of control code (6 EOLs I belive) that should be in TIFFs between pages and that
2005 May 15
1
Re: SpanDSP TXFax and multipage faxes problems (aditional info)
Hi everyone ! I have some aditional info on problem with TXFax and sending multi-page TIFFs. I have made 6 different multi-page TIFFs (Group3 1D with fillbits EOL aligned - 3 pages one TIFF in lowres and one in hires, Group3 2D -3 pages againg in both resolutions , and Group 4 - 3pages in both resolutions), and then tried to send them to Panasonic KX-F1100, Panasonic KX-F500 and SpanDSP
2011 Jan 12
1
Centos 5.5 KVM GRUB / Virtio issue
I have a virtual machine that had been running fine using a RAW disk image (IDE). I am in the process of converting this virtual machine to use a single LVM and virtio. (For LVM backup snapshots and easy resizing purposes (no LVM within the guest)) I create the LVM and copied all the files from the existing RAW image to an ext3 under the LVM. However, I cannot get it to boot. It has to do
2019 Sep 19
6
[PATCH nbdkit 0/2] Add new retry filter.
This is a retry filter implementation as outlined here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-September/msg00167.html It is only lightly tested. One way to test it is to try an SSH copy (see the commit message for patch 2/2), and in the middle of the copy kill the per-connection sshd on the remote machine. You will see that the copy recovers after a few seconds. Add the nbdkit -v
2005 Jun 21
5
app_changrab.c released on pbxfreeware.org
I released app_changrab.c lastnight really late... It includes a way to hijack a channel and originate calls from the CLI. /b --- Keep Your Friends Close, But Your Enemies Even Closer...
2005 May 13
1
Re: SpanDSP TXFax and multipage faxes problems
Hi ! Does anyone managed to send multipage faxes (in single TIFF file) with app_txfax from spandsp package (i'm using 0.0.2pre18, libtiff 3.7.1)? If so, I'm interested in format of TIFF file that has been sent sent succesfully (tiffinfo <fax-filename>). I'm having problems with app_txfax, sending first page successfuly 99 % of the time, but never managed to send second or
2005 Aug 16
10
quad t1 / 1U rack server combos
It is amazing to me at this point that there is not an official Digium list of supported servers (including 1u models!). Clearly the number 1 issue with the Digium PRI cards is the server that they are used in. The new cards even go as far as listing server that DO NOT work on the Digium site! The wiki references are old and do not have any testing parameters. C'mon guys! Certify a