search for: nemet

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > I’ve committed the fix in r263058. Haicheng, Eric/Benjamin, can you guys > please give it a test with your codebase. (You need to enable the pass with > -mllvm -enable-loop-load-elim.) The miscompilation I was seeing is gone now, too. Thanks! > O...

> On Mar 7, 2016, at 9:43 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > > Hi Haicheng, > > Sorry about the breakage. I reverted it in r262839. > > I will try to reproduce it locally. Please don’t blow away your directories yet in case I need further help. OK, I managed to reproduce this locally. Should be ab...

On 02/27/2017 01:47 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com > <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote: > > >> On Feb 27, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov >> <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: >> >> >> On 02/27/2017 11:47 AM, Adam Nemet wrote: >&...

...ng dmarc checks at least as one input of "potentially-spam", if not to outright reject the messages. And it makes sense to do so: that the entire internet can historically write emails that purport to be from me isn't actually a good feature.) On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > OK, for now I filed the ticket with a sample email that did reach me. > Please still let me know if you can dig up a bounced email. > > > On Jul 10, 2015, at 8:49 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > > Do you have a bounced e...

Thank you, Adam. It passes all the benchmarks I have. Haicheng From: anemet at apple.com [mailto:anemet at apple.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 7:17 PM To: Haicheng Wu; Eric Christopher; Benjamin Kramer Cc: llvm-dev Subject: Re: Regression in SPEC2006/gcc caused by LoopLoadElimination I’ve committed the fix in r263058. Haicheng, Eric/Benjamin, can you guys plea...

...t; On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:05 AM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com <mailto:klimek at google.com>> wrote: > aaaaaand you're on the bounce list again. I'm going to delete you again, but I'd be curious what the problem is... > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:50 PM Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote: >> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:19 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:16 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com <mai...

> On Feb 27, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > > On 02/27/2017 11:47 AM, Adam Nemet wrote: >> >>> On Feb 27, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org <mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple....

> On Mar 16, 2017, at 4:04 PM, Adam Nemet via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On Mar 16, 2017, at 3:25 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 03/16/2017 04:13 PM, Adam Nemet wrote: >>> >>>> O...

...hope they'll answer quickly On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:05 AM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > aaaaaand you're on the bounce list again. I'm going to delete you again, > but I'd be curious what the problem is... > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:50 PM Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > >> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:19 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:16 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: >> >> You were in sendgrid's bounce list (there must ha...

> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:19 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:16 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com <mailto:klimek at google.com>> wrote: >> >> You were in sendgrid's bounce list (there must have been at least one bounce from your email to the ap...

> On Mar 15, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > > On 03/15/2017 04:05 PM, Adam Nemet wrote: >> >>> On Mar 15, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 03/15/2017 01:47 PM, Adam Nemet wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mar 15, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Mehdi Ami...

...ntime check. > > Can you provide more details, what you meant by above comment. I would have expected canCheckPtrAtRT/hasComputableBounds to give up when the pointer was not a SCEVAddRecExpr. How do we get passed that point? Adam > > Regards, > Ashutosh > > From: Adam Nemet [mailto:anemet at apple.com] > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 10:30 AM > To: Nema, Ashutosh > Cc: Hal Finkel; Philip Reames; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RFC: Loop versioning for LICM > > > On Mar 19, 2015, at 9:46 PM, Nema, Ashutosh <Ashutosh.Nema at a...

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 4:01 PM Adam Nemet via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I will run it on Cyclone/AArch64 next week. > FYI, we're still waiting on these Adam... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/2017...

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 25, 2014, at 7:05 PM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > >> Hi Jun, >> >> On Jun 25, 2014, at 8:14 AM,...

On 03/16/2017 04:13 PM, Adam Nemet wrote: > >> On Mar 15, 2017, at 2:51 PM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com >> <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Mar 15, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov >>> <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: &...

...x20 processes spawned: processed input files 53.4612071514 secs mapped remarks 0.0622367858887 secs file rendering 8.30268716812 sec index rendering 2.08150291443 sec total time 63.9999139309 secs -Brian From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Adam Nemet via llvm-dev Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:15 AM To: Cain, Brian <bcain at quicinc.com> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; Bob Haarman <inglorion at google.com> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Rewriting opt-viewer in C++ Hi Brian, Great, thanks for doing this! C...

> On Feb 27, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote: > >> On Feb 27, 2017, at 7:27 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: >> >> >> On 02/27/2017 06:29 AM, Nema, Ashutosh wrote: >>> Thanks for looking...

...nt with libYAML + a patch like this one. FWIW prior to this I also tried PyPy (w/original opt-viewer.py+pure python PyYAML) and got a very modest improvement. I haven’t tried revisiting it after parallelization. -Brian From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Adam Nemet via llvm-dev Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 10:14 PM To: Bob Haarman <inglorion at google.com> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Rewriting opt-viewer in C++ Well, we’re talking about completely different inputs. Can you please try the libYAML version...

Hi Adam > On Jul 30, 2014, at 10:28 PM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > > Hi Pete, > > Just to clarify, are you proposing two things here? First, 0b… literals to have type bits<n> and second to allow bits<n> initializer to contain other bits<m> elements which would initialize the next m elements. &g...

...in speed actually makes the tool more useful in that it can now feasibly be used on larger projects. I'll clean up the code a bit (it's very much proof of concept now) and put it up for review once that's done. > > Bob > > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote: > Again I am still undecided which way this should go but I was also wondering about the speed difference if we used the C-based parser in PyYAML (http://pyyaml.org/wiki/LibYAML <http://pyyaml.org/wiki/LibYAML>). > &...