search for: anemet

Thank you, Adam. It passes all the benchmarks I have. Haicheng From: anemet at apple.com [mailto:anemet at apple.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 7:17 PM To: Haicheng Wu; Eric Christopher; Benjamin Kramer Cc: llvm-dev Subject: Re: Regression in SPEC2006/gcc caused by LoopLoadElimination I’ve committed the fix in r263058. Haicheng, Eric/Benjamin, can you guys plea...

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > I’ve committed the fix in r263058. Haicheng, Eric/Benjamin, can you guys > please give it a test with your codebase. (You need to enable the pass with > -mllvm -enable-loop-load-elim.) The miscompilation I was seeing is gone now, too. Thanks! > On Mar 7, 20...

> On Mar 7, 2016, at 9:43 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > > Hi Haicheng, > > Sorry about the breakage. I reverted it in r262839. > > I will try to reproduce it locally. Please don’t blow away your directories yet in case I need further help. OK, I managed to reproduce this locally. Should be able to make...

...opt –O3 –gvn test.ll –o test.opt.ll $ opt –O3 –newgvn test.ll –o test.opt.ll “test.ll” is attached, it got already vectorized by the approach running vectorizer twice by annotate the remainder loop with metadata to limit the vectorization factor for epilog vector loop. Regards, Ashutosh From: anemet at apple.com [mailto:anemet at apple.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 1:33 AM To: Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org>; Nema, Ashutosh <Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com>; Zaks, Ayal <ayal.zaks at intel.com>; Renato Golin <renato.golin at...

...Jul 9, 2015 at 10:05 AM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com <mailto:klimek at google.com>> wrote: > aaaaaand you're on the bounce list again. I'm going to delete you again, but I'd be curious what the problem is... > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:50 PM Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote: >> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:19 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:16 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com <mailto:klimek...

On 02/27/2017 01:47 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com > <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote: > > >> On Feb 27, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov >> <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: >> >> >> On 02/27/2017 11:47 AM, Adam Nemet wrote: >>> &gt...

...llvm.org/file/data/fxg5vx3capyj257rrn5j/PHID-FILE-x6thnbf6ub55ep5yhalu/LayoutDescription.png Approach-1 looks feasible, please comment if any objections. Regards, Ashutosh From: Nema, Ashutosh Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 10:42 AM To: 'Daniel Berlin' <dberlin at dberlin.org> Cc: anemet at apple.com; Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>; Zaks, Ayal <ayal.zaks at intel.com>; Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>; mkuper at google.com; Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: RE: [llvm-dev] [Proposal][RFC] Ep...

...'ll answer quickly On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:05 AM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > aaaaaand you're on the bounce list again. I'm going to delete you again, > but I'd be curious what the problem is... > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:50 PM Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > >> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:19 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:16 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: >> >> You were in sendgrid's bounce list (there must have been at...

...Approach-1 looks feasible, please comment if any objections. >> Regards, >> Ashutosh >> *From:*Nema, Ashutosh >> *Sent:*Wednesday, March 1, 2017 10:42 AM >> *To:*'Daniel Berlin' <dberlin at dberlin.org <mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org>> >> *Cc:*anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>; Hal Finkel >> <hfinkel at anl.gov <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>>; Zaks, Ayal >> <ayal.zaks at intel.com <mailto:ayal.zaks at intel.com>>; Renato Golin >> <renato.golin at linaro.org >> <mailto:r...

...please comment if any objections. > > Regards, > > Ashutosh > > *From:*Nema, Ashutosh > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 1, 2017 10:42 AM > *To:* 'Daniel Berlin' <dberlin at dberlin.org > <mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org>> > *Cc:* anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>; Hal Finkel > <hfinkel at anl.gov <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>>; Zaks, Ayal > <ayal.zaks at intel.com <mailto:ayal.zaks at intel.com>>; Renato Golin > <renato.golin at linaro.org <mailto:renato.golin a...

...hecks at least as one input of "potentially-spam", if not to outright reject the messages. And it makes sense to do so: that the entire internet can historically write emails that purport to be from me isn't actually a good feature.) On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > OK, for now I filed the ticket with a sample email that did reach me. > Please still let me know if you can dig up a bounced email. > > > On Jul 10, 2015, at 8:49 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > > Do you have a bounced email, we ca...

...lorion at google.com>> wrote: That's compared to the implementation with the Python parser. So if the libYAML parser is 6x the speed of that, the C++ version would be about 10x the speed of the implementation with libYAML, instead of 60x. On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com<mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote: On Nov 15, 2016, at 10:33 AM, Bob Haarman <inglorion at google.com<mailto:inglorion at google.com>> wrote: Thanks for your comments, everyone! I'll try to answer the questions people have asked. First, let me say that I lik...

...gt; > Can you provide more details, what you meant by above comment. I would have expected canCheckPtrAtRT/hasComputableBounds to give up when the pointer was not a SCEVAddRecExpr. How do we get passed that point? Adam > > Regards, > Ashutosh > > From: Adam Nemet [mailto:anemet at apple.com] > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 10:30 AM > To: Nema, Ashutosh > Cc: Hal Finkel; Philip Reames; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RFC: Loop versioning for LICM > > > On Mar 19, 2015, at 9:46 PM, Nema, Ashutosh <Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com <mail...

..., >> >> Ashutosh >> >> *From:*Nema, Ashutosh >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 1, 2017 10:42 AM >> *To:* 'Daniel Berlin' <dberlin at dberlin.org >> <mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org>> >> *Cc:* anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>; Hal Finkel >> <hfinkel at anl.gov <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>>; Zaks, Ayal >> <ayal.zaks at intel.com <mailto:ayal.zaks at intel.com>>; Renato >> Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org &...

...actually makes the tool more useful in that it can now feasibly be used on larger projects. I'll clean up the code a bit (it's very much proof of concept now) and put it up for review once that's done. > > Bob > > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote: > Again I am still undecided which way this should go but I was also wondering about the speed difference if we used the C-based parser in PyYAML (http://pyyaml.org/wiki/LibYAML <http://pyyaml.org/wiki/LibYAML>). > >> On...

> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:19 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:16 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com <mailto:klimek at google.com>> wrote: >> >> You were in sendgrid's bounce list (there must have been at least one bounce from your email to the apple servers...

...op control. So, (future) FORTRAN usage doesn’t seem to be a good example for promoting support for case A (= FP primary induction variable). From: Chandler Carruth [mailto:chandlerc at google.com] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 7:03 PM To: Demikhovsky, Elena <elena.demikhovsky at intel.com>; anemet at apple.com; Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> Cc: Saito, Hideki <hideki.saito at intel.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Working on FP SCEV Analysis On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 7:03 AM Demikhov...

...> > On 02/27/2017 11:47 AM, Adam Nemet wrote: >> >>> On Feb 27, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org <mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Feb 27, 2017, at 7:27 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 02/27/2017 06:29 AM, Nema, Ashutosh wrote: &g...

> On Mar 19, 2015, at 9:46 PM, Nema, Ashutosh <Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com> wrote: > > Thanks Adam for your reply. > > From: Adam Nemet [mailto:anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>] > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 3:23 AM > To: Nema, Ashutosh > Cc: Hal Finkel; Philip Reames; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RFC: Loop versioning for LICM > > Hi Ashutosh, &gt...

> On Jun 11, 2015, at 12:48 AM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote: >> >>> On Jun 10, 2015, at 11:44 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Base is treated as unsigned so 0xff…ff + 1 would be 0x100…00 >>> >>> This is...