Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "nemenyi".
Did you mean:
demeny
2006 Nov 07
0
Nemenyi test for two way layout data.
I am trying to do a Nonparametric Nemenyi test for multiple comparison in a two way layout data because I need to know the exact distribution. I don?t know if this test is in the R software. I just found a Nemenyi test for a one way design. But in Hollander book the Nemenyi test is in page 253 for to way layout data.
Thank you for your he...
2010 Sep 16
1
Nemenyi test as a post-hoc test to Kruskal Wallis
Dear all,
I've discovered the possibility to do the Nemenyi-Damico-Wolfe-Dunn test in the library(coin); oneway_test()
With the given example I am unfortunately not able to reproduce the test. What does trafo and contrMat mean?
I have a dataframe with 176 elements in 7 classes. It may be a problem, that my model isn't balanced? In Class1 I happen to hav...
2005 May 02
2
Nonparametric Tukey-type multiple comparisons "Nemenyi" test
I am trying to do a Nonparametric Tukey-type multiple comparison
post-hoc test to determine which groups are significantly different. I
have read the dialogue on this topic from the R-help, and am still not
clear why no statistical packages include this test as an option? Is it
not an appropriate test to conduct on non-normally distributed data? Is
the only option to calculate it by hand
2012 Jan 09
2
Unexpected results using the oneway_test in the coin package
Dear fellow R users,
Keywords: Kruskal-Wallis, Post-Hoc, pair-wise comparisons, Nemenyi-Damico-Wolfe-Dunn test, coin package, oneway_test
I am using the "oneway_test" function in the R package "coin" and I am obtaining results which I cannot believe are accurate. I do not wish to waste anyone's time and so if the following problem is rather trivial, I apologiz...
2012 Mar 26
0
Different result with "kruskal.test" and post-hoc analysis with Nemenyi-Damico-Wolfe-Dunn test implemented in the help page for oneway_test in the coin package that uses multcomp
Dear Researchers,
Sorry for this email but I am not a statistician, and for this I have this
problem to understand. Thanks in Advance for help and suggestions.
Gianni
I have 21 classes (00, 01, 02, 04, ....,020) with different length. I did a
kruskal wall test in R with the following code
kruskal.test(m.class.l, m.class.length.lf)
Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test
data: m.class.l and
2007 Oct 26
1
Post-hoc test for Kruskal-Wallis
Hi there,
I've got a small question :
is there any post-hoc test for Kruskal rank sum test integrated in R ?
I know that the Nemenyi test is one of the post-hoc that can be used,
but there's no (to by knowledge) R function for it.
What should I do ?
Thanks,
Etienne
2008 Mar 06
1
kruskal wallis post hoc test in R
Hello,
I need nemenyi-test or any other post-hoc test for kruskal-wallis, but I
just can't find out how to implement this in R.
My data set is nitrite concentrations in four different groups which I
intend to compare. The kruskal-wallis-test showed significance, but I
still don't know between which groups these...
2009 Mar 30
0
Kruskal-Wallis-test: Posthoc-test?
...e posthoc-test in order to find out which sample
means actually are statistically different.
1. We think that the Behrens-Fisher-test and multiple steel test are not
applicable, because they assume normality distribution as far as we know. Is
that right?
2. Statistical literature suggested to do a Nemenyi-test as posthoc-test.
But this test in general requires balanced sample sizes; so we need a
special type of this test. Is it possible to do such a test in R?
3. We could also test all the samples against each other with a
nonparamatric Mann-Whitney-U-test and correct for the multiple comparisons
(m...
2009 Sep 21
1
Post-Hoc tests for Friedman Test?
Hi there all,
This is my first post to the list and I'll first say a few things:
- R is great!
- The archives of this list have helped me solve all of my
problems/questions so far
- I only know enough statistics "to be dangerous"
I'm looking for a way to do post-hoc tests for the Friedman test. I
have a dataset from a within-subjects design with 5 conditions where
some of
2011 Nov 21
2
count ties after rank?
Hello!
I need to use Kruskal-Wallis test and post-hoc test (Dunn's test) for my data. But when I searched around, I only found this function: kruskal.test. But nothing for Dunn's test.
So I started to write one myself. But I do not know how to count ties in the data frame. I can use for loops but it seems long and unnecessary since the rank function actually knows the ties. So
2009 Jun 19
2
Post-Hoc Test for Kruskal-Wallis Rank Sum Test
Hi list,
I would like to know if there is a way in R to execute a post-hoc test
(factor levels comparison, like Tukey for ANOVA) of a non-parametric
analysis of variance (kruskal.test() function object). I was looking for
something like the Dunn Test. I’ve searched the internet but nothing seemed
to define a way to it.
Do You have any suggestion? Other equivalent test maybe!
Thanks in
2008 Mar 10
2
question for aov and kruskal
Hi R users!
I have the following problem: how appropriate is my aov model under the violation of anova assumptions?
Example:
a<-c(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3,3)
b<-c(101,1010,200,300,400, 202, 121, 234, 55,555,66,76,88,34,239, 30, 40, 50,50,60)
z<-data.frame(a, b)
fligner.test(z$b, factor(z$a))
aov(z$b~factor(z$a))->ll
TukeyHSD(ll)
Now from the aov i found that my model
2008 Dec 08
2
Permutation exact test to compare related series
I all,
is there a way with R to perform an exact permutation test to replace the
wilcoxon test to compare paired series and/or to perform pairwise multiple
comparisons for related series after a Friedman test ?
Thanks
Gilles
2001 Feb 27
4
Post hoc tests
This is only partly an R question, but this seems a good place to ask.
Like many, if not most, statistics programs, R has no post hoc tests
for Kruskal Wallis or Friedman, and as far as I can make out they are
not available in any of the R packages. I would be grateful if someone
could point me in the right direction if I am wrong.
As I said this is not uncommon. Parametric Anova procedures
2009 Oct 14
3
post-hoc test with kruskal.test()
Dear R users,
I would like to know if there is a way in R to execute a post-hoc test
(factor levels comparison, like Tukey for ANOVA) of a non-parametric
analysis of variance with kruskal.test() function. I am comparing three
different groups. The preliminary analysis using the kruskal-wallis-test
show significance, but I still don''t know the relationship and the
significance level
2009 Apr 01
0
回复: R-help Digest, Vol 73, Issue 32
...e posthoc-test in order to find out which sample
means actually are statistically different.
1. We think that the Behrens-Fisher-test and multiple steel test are not
applicable, because they assume normality distribution as far as we know. Is
that right?
2. Statistical literature suggested to do a Nemenyi-test as posthoc-test.
But this test in general requires balanced sample sizes; so we need a
special type of this test. Is it possible to do such a test in R?
3. We could also test all the samples against each other with a
nonparamatric Mann-Whitney-U-test and correct for the multiple comparisons
(m...