search for: neeli

Hi Chad - We have a functional Fortran compiler, with the PGI front-end bridged directly to LLVM, all of our Fortran runtime libraries integrated, and the Clang driver adapted for use with the Fortran compiler. We're working with a few users at DOE who are trying to compile big applications with a binary version of the compiler. Work is ongoing to migrate the source code into an LLVM-style

> On May 26, 2016, at 1:57 PM, Neely, Rob via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Chad, et al, > > In addition to Doug’s excellent technical update, I’ll note that we are > starting to have some discussions on the DOE side with PGI about > establishing a more formal review team made up of some key LLVM > stakeholders to help smooth the way for a broader

This process is certainly only open to a select group, so pragmatically it's closed. I can understand that it will certainly not be an easy process once it's public due to the amount of code and complexity. Maybe someone can comment on a specific issue - When we ported our Fortran front-end to target llvm, we found that Fortran ENTRY doesn't map very well to llvm ir. Can anyone who

No closed doors intended here. Just a recognition that for something like an initial review to be useful, we probably have to be a bit careful in how many people we can reasonably involve before it could get unwieldy, and trying to be respectful of people’s time if we can nail down 90% of issues with a smaller group before going broader. I think we’d be fine with opening up the WebEx presentations

Chad, et al, In addition to Doug’s excellent technical update, I’ll note that we are starting to have some discussions on the DOE side with PGI about establishing a more formal review team made up of some key LLVM stakeholders to help smooth the way for a broader public rollout of the Flang code base and eventual integration. We’ll probably rely on Hal and others here to help us figure out who

Hi Chad, I can tell you that progress is being made on PGI's side; I'll let Doug/Rob provide more detailed updates. -Hal ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chad Rosier" <mcrosier at codeaurora.org> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "flang-dev" <flang-dev at googlegroups.com>, "douglas miles (PGI)"

Hi Hal, I haven't been following this closely, but has there been any updates recently. Regards, Chad -----Original Message----- From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Chris Lattner via llvm-dev Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 12:46 AM To: Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> Cc: LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; flang-dev <flang-dev at

I just downloaded and installed R 2.3.0 on my Mac G5 running OS X 10.4.6. I also updated with R.app revision 3114 as recommended. Now, when I attemp to use package rgl I get the error > library(rgl) Error: package 'rgl' is not installed for 'arch=ppc' > I have tried reinstalling from CRAN using both binary and source. The source install fails, The binary install yields

All excellent news! Thanks for the update, Doug! -----Original Message----- From: douglas miles (PGI) [mailto:douglas.miles at pgroup.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 2:58 PM To: Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>; mcrosier at codeaurora.org Cc: flang-dev <flang-dev at googlegroups.com>; Rob Neely <neely4 at llnl.gov>; Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>; llvm-dev at

Has anyone gotten Packet8 setup as a sip trunk for Asterisk? Would they be so kind as to share their config or point me to a website that shows how it can be done? I would be much obliged. Grady -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060621/311435fd/attachment.htm

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alex Bradbury" <asb at asbradbury.org> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "LLVM Dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "flang-dev" <flang-dev at googlegroups.com>, "Rob Neely" <neely4 at llnl.gov>, > "douglas miles (PGI)" <douglas.miles at

Hi everyone, I have some very good news for everyone interested a production-quality Fortran frontend for LLVM: The U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration and its three national labs have reached an agreement with NVIDIA's PGI division to adapt and open-source PGI's Fortran frontend, and associated Fortran runtime library, for contribution to the LLVM

We have a number of scripts that use rsync to automate administration of a number our servers. We are adding servers that are not directly network accessible to our main admin box. That is, we have to go through an intermediate machine to reach these new machines. I've seen how you can string ssh commands together to copy commands through an intermediate machine. Does anyone know of a

Hello, The mysql40-client port currently reports a security problem when I try to install it: neely:/usr/ports/databases/mysql40-client$ make ===> mysql-client-4.0.18_1 has known vulnerabilities: >> MySQL insecure temporary file creation (mysqlbug). Reference: <http://people.freebsd.org/~eik/portaudit/2e129846-8fbb-11d8-8b29-0020ed76ef5a.html> >> Please update your ports

> On Nov 13, 2015, at 2:22 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I have some very good news for everyone interested a production-quality Fortran frontend for LLVM: > > The U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration and its three national labs have reached an agreement with NVIDIA's PGI

Hi, I am trying to get my Samba installation to use PAM under Ubuntu. I have created the /etc/pam.d/samba, but as far as I can tell samba is not using the directives in there. I have ssh and netatalk using PAM successfully against a Kerberos ticket issuer, so I know my PAM installation is working for some services. I am sure I have something wrong in my smb.conf as I am a bit of a newbie with

Hello everyone! How are you? Hope you''re well :) Here''s my setup at home: Internet -> (eth1) Comp1 (shorewall, DHCP, dns server, Internet sharing) (eth0) -> Linksys (wireless) ~~~~~~~~~~~~ (wlan0) Comp2 (eth0) -> IP Phone My computer1 is well confiugred, everything was working right and well. I decided to move the IP Phone to the COmputer 2. I was able to make this

Hello! A machine I manage remotely for a friend comes under a distributed ssh break-in attack every once in a while. Annoyed (and alarmed) by the messages like: Aug 12 10:21:17 symbion sshd[4333]: Invalid user mythtv from 85.234.158.180 Aug 12 10:21:18 symbion sshd[4335]: Invalid user mythtv from 85.234.158.180 Aug 12 10:21:20 symbion sshd[4337]: Invalid user mythtv from 85.234.158.180 Aug 12

Hello! A machine I manage remotely for a friend comes under a distributed ssh break-in attack every once in a while. Annoyed (and alarmed) by the messages like: Aug 12 10:21:17 symbion sshd[4333]: Invalid user mythtv from 85.234.158.180 Aug 12 10:21:18 symbion sshd[4335]: Invalid user mythtv from 85.234.158.180 Aug 12 10:21:20 symbion sshd[4337]: Invalid user mythtv from 85.234.158.180 Aug 12

by the way, how come the list got another "mail delivery system" email whenever i sent a post?...weird... On 8/30/06, Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@mx3-83.sinamail.sina.com.cn> wrote: > This is the Postfix program at host mx3-83.sinamail.sina.com.cn. > > I''m sorry to have to inform you that your message could not > be delivered to one or more recipients.