Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1079 matches for "needlessly".
2009 Oct 08
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6788] New: rsync does not abort early but needlessly transfers data if destination is write protected
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6788
Summary: rsync does not abort early but needlessly transfers data
if destination is write protected
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.5
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned...
2023 Apr 06
2
[Bug 3559] New: Mini memory leak and needless(?) const/static qualifier.
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3559
Bug ID: 3559
Summary: Mini memory leak and needless(?) const/static
qualifier.
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 8.5p1
Hardware: Other
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: ssh
2013 May 13
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Minor fix to StackColoring to avoid needlessly clearing mem operands.
..., Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the email I sent last week.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:04 PM
> Subject: [PATCH] Minor fix to StackColoring to avoid needlessly clearing mem operands.
> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
>
>
> The following code snippet taken from StackColoring::remapInstructions clears a mem operand if it can't guarantee whether the memoperand's underlying value aliases with the merged al...
2009 May 30
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6422] New: rsync needlessly aborts when getcwd() fails
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6422
Summary: rsync needlessly aborts when getcwd() fails
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.6
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: vapier@gento...
2013 May 13
0
[LLVMdev] Fwd: [PATCH] Minor fix to StackColoring to avoid needlessly clearing mem operands.
This is the email I sent last week.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:04 PM
Subject: [PATCH] Minor fix to StackColoring to avoid needlessly clearing
mem operands.
To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
The following code snippet taken from StackColoring::remapInstructions
clears a mem operand if it can't guarantee whether the memoperand's
underlying value aliases with the merged allocas:
// Update th...
2003 Jul 01
0
Please avoid needless multipart
Hi all,
I would like to ask that if you post to this list, please avoid
signatures, vcards, and other unnecessary attachments. In order to keep
this list virtually spam free, despite the fact that it gets sent spam
literally every day, I moderate anything that comes in with text/html or
multipart/*. However, it means I have to moderate these things
manually, so, to make my life easier,
2001 Jun 08
0
SSH / X11 auth: needless complexity -> security problems?
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Markus Friedl posted the following to Bugtraq:
> this feature [placing the X11 cookie file in /tmp] was inherited
> from ossh and the reason was:
> 1) if $HOME is on NFS, then the cookie travels unencrypted
> over the network, this defeats the purpose of X11-fwding
> 2) $HOME/.Xauthority gets polluted with temorary cookies.
> however,
2007 Feb 21
1
avoiding a needless function evaluation in optimize() (PR#9523)
Full_Name: Jelle Goeman
Version: 2.4.0
OS: windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (145.88.209.33)
Hi,
I like to use optimize() to optimize functions whose evaluation is costly in
terms of computation time. The Brent algorithm which is implemented in optimize
was designed to optimize a function with as few function evaluations as
possible. Therefore it bothers me that optimize() always evaluates
2013 May 13
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Minor fix to StackColoring to avoid needlessly clearing mem operands.
Hi Akira, did anything happen with this patch?
Ciao, Duncan.
On 09/05/13 04:04, Akira Hatanaka wrote:
> The following code snippet taken from StackColoring::remapInstructions clears a
> mem operand if it can't guarantee whether the memoperand's underlying value
> aliases with the merged allocas:
>
> // Update the MachineMemOperand to use the new alloca.
> 522
2016 Oct 20
8
photos on iPhone 6
A bit of a perennial I'm afraid. My wife has filled up her iPhone 6
with photos, and wants them moved onto my computer. I'm running CentOS
7 patched about 30 minutes ago. Needless to say the computer can't see
the data on the iPhone, though it does recognise the phone as an iPhone.
Any suggestions (well any that don't involve a steam roller, sledge
hammer or GBH to the whole of
2013 May 13
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Minor fix to StackColoring to avoid needlessly clearing mem operands.
Hi Duncan,
No, it hasn't been reviewed yet.
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Akira, did anything happen with this patch?
>
> Ciao, Duncan.
>
>
> On 09/05/13 04:04, Akira Hatanaka wrote:
>
>> The following code snippet taken from StackColoring::**remapInstructions
>> clears a
>> mem operand if it
2014 Feb 03
5
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Removing FCA constants from the IR
Currently, you're allowed to form a constant of aggregate type using any
number of other constants you like. This makes scanning the instructions of
the IR needlessly complex when looking for references to constants.
There is no need to support this degree of complexity in the IR. We could
require that for anything but 'zeroinitializer' you cannot write a constant
of aggregate (structure or array) type. You have to build it using
insertvalue.
Thoughts?...
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 3/10] I386 mcheck p4 grotesque and needless warning fix.patch
No, just no. You do not use goto to skip a code block. You do not
return an obvious variable from a singly-inlined function and give
the function a return value. You don't put unexplained comments
about kmalloc in code which doesn't do dynamic allocation. And
you don't leave stray warnings around for no good reason.
Also, when possible, it is better to use block scoped variables
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 3/10] I386 mcheck p4 grotesque and needless warning fix.patch
No, just no. You do not use goto to skip a code block. You do not
return an obvious variable from a singly-inlined function and give
the function a return value. You don't put unexplained comments
about kmalloc in code which doesn't do dynamic allocation. And
you don't leave stray warnings around for no good reason.
Also, when possible, it is better to use block scoped variables
2013 May 09
5
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Minor fix to StackColoring to avoid needlessly clearing mem operands.
The following code snippet taken from StackColoring::remapInstructions
clears a mem operand if it can't guarantee whether the memoperand's
underlying value aliases with the merged allocas:
// Update the MachineMemOperand to use the new alloca.
522 for (MachineInstr::mmo_iterator MM = I->memoperands_begin(),
....
// Climb up and find the original alloca.
532 V =
2012 Jan 03
6
turning off udev for eth0
I have set up a kvm host and configured a standard clone
prototype for generating new guests. One persistent (pun
intended) annoyance when cloning is the behaviour of udev
with respect to the virtual network interface.
The prototype is configured with just eth0 having a
dedicated IP addr. When the prototype is cloned udev
creates rules for both eth0 and eth1 in the clone.
Because eth1 does not
2012 Jan 03
6
turning off udev for eth0
I have set up a kvm host and configured a standard clone
prototype for generating new guests. One persistent (pun
intended) annoyance when cloning is the behaviour of udev
with respect to the virtual network interface.
The prototype is configured with just eth0 having a
dedicated IP addr. When the prototype is cloned udev
creates rules for both eth0 and eth1 in the clone.
Because eth1 does not
2003 Apr 17
3
accessing current factor in tapply
G'Day,
I want to access in a function called from tapply the current factor. In
my example below, all I want to do is to write the current factor on each
histogram. Needless to say my example does not work. I would be grateful
for pointers in the right direction.
Many thanks
Bernie McConnell
Sea Mammal Reserach Unit
cc <- 1:10
ff <- rep(c("a","b"),5)
pp<-
2006 Oct 18
3
[LLVMdev] Nightly Test Machine Identification
...upgraded my Linux kernel from 2.6.17 to 2.6.18. I suggested to Jim
that changes in the minor revision number of the operating system should
not count as a new machine. He said he'd look into it when he has time.
Its not a huge issue, I just didn't want to be incrementing the machine
numbers needlessly and needed to know what it was based on.
Reid.
2012 Nov 30
1
[LLVMdev] Getting Started
On 29 Nov 2012, at 17:46, Eli Bendersky wrote:
> I think this is a good idea, although personally I'd prefer the script
> to be written in Python to allow more portability (i.e. using it on
> Windows as well).
If you are doing a build using the UNIX-like way of checking everything out and building it, then you will already have a shell installed via mingw or cygwin on Windows. If