search for: necessarilli

On Feb 7, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Michele Scandale <michele.scandale at gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks for the details. Please add them to a bug report. > > I will do this. Thanks. >> InstCombine is certainly interfering with our ability to analyze the loop. I think the problem is that ScalarEvolution cannot reason about signed division. This is a general problem independent of

On 02/08/2013 06:56 AM, Andrew Trick wrote: > There's been talk of adding metata do the branch that terminates the loop latch block. What llvm calls the "latch" is just a unique backward branch to the loop header and not necessarilly even a loop exit. > > I'm not sure how you would interpret that metadata, since the branch exit may be rewritten (just like the loop

> Thanks for the details. Please add them to a bug report. I will do this. > InstCombine is certainly interfering with our ability to analyze the loop. I think the problem is that ScalarEvolution cannot reason about signed division. This is a general problem independent of your target. At the moment I'm not sure if we can teach ScalarEvolution to reason about this, or if we can defer

Sep, 22nd,2005 Dear Authors, Thanks for reading this email. I'm a graduate student from China (PRC) and learning the R at present. Now I have some questions to ask you as I have met some strange problems during installing and running the R environment, which can not be found in the "R FAQ" document (or just I can not find them). It might be useful that I gived you the information

The following patch swaps the command line handling of kinit. It seems apparent that, if one were to call kinit like so: kinit root=/foo/bar They would be attempting to override the /proc/cmdline. As it stands, kinit parses the /proc/cmdline *first*, meaning the above does not work. Just for a simple use case: User A has an encrypted root device, root=/dev/hda3 Some init scripts detect this,

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrew Trick" <atrick at apple.com> > To: "Michele Scandale" <michele.scandale at gmail.com> > Cc: "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 11:56:42 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Rotated loop identification > > > On Feb 7, 2013, at 10:53 AM,

I am trying to come up with a workable solution in managing numerous Mac workstations allowing a high degree of flexibility with regards to certs. My puppet environment is setup to application installation on machines that have been ''imaged'' with a base OS and the puppet and facter apps. So, when a Mac is ''imaged'' and subsequently re-booted, puppet is run at